Mob vandalises Bahadur Shah Zafar’s portrait at Ghaziabad railway station claiming it is Aurangzeb’s
Ghaziabad: Members of a Hindutva group blackened with spray paint a portrait of Bahadur Shah Zafar, who was the last Mughal emperor, on Friday at Ghaziabad railway station, mistaking it to be of Aurangzeb.
Brandishing saffron flags and chanting ‘Aurangzeb Murdabad' or down with Aurangzeb slogans, members of the Hindu Raksha Dal stormed platform four and sprayed black paint over the 16-feet-tall mural of Bahadur Shah Zafar, as reported by The Times of India on Saturday.
The incident disrupted regular station activities and caused inconvenience to several passengers waiting for their trains.
“Before we could realise what was happening, they climbed atop each other and started smearing the portrait with colour. We tried to convince them, but they thought they were right,” an unidentified station official was quoted as saying by TOI.
The official added that the members also wrote “HRD” on the mural and shouted “Hindu Raksha Dal Zindabad”.
The mural of Bahadur Shah Zafar was painted by the non-profit organisation by CS Disha Foundation in 2016. The NGO had also decorated other platforms with portraits of Tatya Tope, Mangal Pandey and Rani Laxmi Bai, among other historical figures.
“The painting in question is certainly not of Aurangzeb, but of Bahadur Shah Zafar. Historically, Aurangzeb is not even distantly related to the First War of Independence, but Bahadur Shah Zafar definitely is,” TOI quoted Udita Tyagi of CS Disha Foundation, who supervised the art project, as saying.
Aurangzeb has become the subject of controversy in recent weeks after Hindutva groups, including the Vishva Hindu Parishad and Bajrang Dal, called for the removal of his tomb from Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, formerly Aurangabad, in Maharashtra.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
High courts upheld only 8 per cent of death sentences; SC confirms none in recent years: Report
New Delhi (PTI): Highlighting that a high acquittal rate of death row convicts by the Supreme Court and high courts demonstrates a pattern of "erroneous or unjustified convictions", a study of 10 years of death penalty data has revealed that the top court did not confirm any death sentences in recent years.
The study by Square Circle Clinic, a criminal laws advocacy group with the NALSAR University of Law in Hyderabad, found that an overwhelming majority of death sentences imposed by trial courts did not withstand scrutiny at higher judicial levels. Acquittals far outnumbered confirmations at both the high courts and Supreme Court levels.
According to the report, the trial courts across India awarded 1,310 death sentences in 822 cases between 2016 and 2025. High courts considered 842 of these sentences in confirmation proceedings but upheld only 70 or 8.31 per cent.
In contrast, 258 death sentences (30.64 per cent) resulted in acquittals. The study noted that the acquittal rate at the high court level was nearly four times the confirmation rate.
Data showed that of the 70 death sentences confirmed by high courts, the Supreme Court decided 38 and did not uphold a single one. The apex court has confirmed no death sentences between 2023 and 2025.
"Wrongful or erroneous or unjustified convictions, then, are not random or freak accidents in the Indian criminal justice system. The data indicates they are a persistent and serious systemic concern," the report said.
Over the last decade, high courts adjudicated 1,085 death sentences in 647 cases, confirming only 106 (9.77 per cent). During this period, 326 persons in 191 cases, were acquitted.
The report attributed low confirmation rates to the appellate judiciary’s concerns regarding failures in due process. "This coincides with increased Supreme Court scrutiny of safeguards at the sentencing stage," the report said.
Of the 153 death sentences decided by the apex court over the last decade, the accused were acquitted in 38 cases. In 2025 alone, high courts overturned death sentences into acquittals in 22 out of 85 cases (over 25 per cent). The same year, Supreme Court acquitted accused persons in more than half of the death penalty cases it decided (10 out of 19), the report said.
The study highlighted that 364 persons who were ultimately acquitted "should not even have been convicted and unjustifiably suffered the trauma of death row". It added that such failures extend beyond adjudication and reflect serious lapses in investigation and prosecution.
The question of remedies for wrongful convictions remains pending before the Supreme Court. In September 2025, three persons acquitted by the apex court filed writ petitions seeking compensation from the state and argued that their wrongful convictions violated their fundamental right to life and liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution.
"In 2022, the Supreme Court crystallised a sentencing process in Manoj v. State of Madhya Pradesh , and mandated all courts to follow those guidelines before imposing or confirming a death sentence," the report read.
In 2025, the apex court held in Vasanta Sampat Dupare v. Union of India that death penalty sentencing hearings form part of the right to a fair trial and stressed that capital punishment can be imposed only after a constitutionally compliant sentencing process.
"However, even at the high courts whether the process mandated under Manoj is being complied with is in doubt,” the report said.
