Mysuru (PTI): Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on Tuesday said he is "not worried or tense" as claimed by opposition leaders in the wake of Governor's sanction for his prosecution in the Mysuru Urban Development Authority (MUDA) site allotment issue, as he has not committed any wrong.
Rather, he said, opposition leaders are worried about their "lies against him not turning true."
"They (opposition) have lied and they are worried about it not proving it as true. I have never lied and have not committed any wrong, so I'm not worried," Siddaramaiah told reporters here in response to a question about him appearing to be relaxed, while the opposition was claiming that he was tense and worried.
The Karnataka High Court on Monday extended till September nine the interim stay on trial court proceedings against the Chief Minister Siddaramaiah in the MUDA case.
The Court adjourned for a week the hearing on Siddaramaiah's petition challenging the legality of Governor Thaawarchand's sanction for his prosecution in the case.
The Governor on August 16 accorded sanction under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 218 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for the commission of the alleged offences as mentioned in the petitions of Pradeep Kumar S P, T J Abraham and Snehamayi Krishna.
On August 19, Siddaramaiah moved the High Court challenging the legality of the Governor's order.
Responding to senior Congress MLA and Administrative Reforms Commission Chairperson R V Deshpande's comments on Sunday expressing his wish to become the Chief Minister, Siddaramaiah said: "Who makes the CM? It is the legislators and the high command, they will decide...."
The Chief Minister on Tuesday visited the Chamundeshwari temple on the Chamundi hill and offered prayers to the goddess there.
He also chaired a meeting of the Chamundeshwari Kshetra Development Authority for the first time after the stay on the implementation of the act passed by the legislature in connection with its formation was vacated by the court.
He noted that the government has formed the Authority. A member of the erstwhile Mysuru royal family Pramoda Devi Wadiyar had obtained a stay on it from the court, which has now been vacated.
When pointed out that the Mysuru royal scion and BJP MP Yaduveer Krishnadatta Chamaraja Wadiyar has written a letter to the government terming the meeting illegal, Siddaramaiah asked: "should we go by the court order or the letter of the MP? We are going by the court."
Asked as to what action will the government take based on retired Karnataka High Court Justice John Michael Cunha headed inquiry commission report regarding alleged irregularities in Covid-19 management when the BJP was in power, the Chief Minister said the report will be placed before the Cabinet at its meeting on Thursday and a decision will be taken.
"We don't know what is there in the report," he said.
Taking a dig at BJP and former Minister K Sudhakar, who was in-charge of the Health Department when the saffron party was in power, for terming the report as "politically motivated," he said: "...does he (Sudhakar) know what is there in the report? I myself don't know, does he know? It is because he had committed a wrong, he is worried....How does he know a false report has been accepted?"
How can someone comment on the report, when it has not yet been made public, he further asked. "It shows his (Sudhakar) guilty consciousness. He knows he has committed wrong. So without seeing a report such comments are being made."
On the suspension of Karnataka Administrative Service Officer G T Dinesh Kumar for alleged irregularities during his tenure as the commissioner of MUDA, Siddaramaiah said it has been done by the Urban Development Department.
When asked as to why action has been taken against one officer, when two were facing allegations, he said: "whoever has committed any wrong, action will be taken against them based on the report of the inquiry commission that has been appointed. Let's see what comes from the inquiry commission report."
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday upheld the inclusion of the words ‘socialist’ and ‘secular’ in the Preamble of the Constitution, confirming their retrospective application from November 26, 1949. The court ruled that the power to amend the Constitution under Article 368 extends to the Preamble, which is an integral part of the document.
A Bench led by Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna stated, “The power under Article 368 cannot be curtailed. It will equally apply to the Preamble.” The 42nd Constitutional Amendment, which introduced these terms in 1976 during the Emergency, was challenged on grounds of its retrospective application and the lack of states’ ratification.
The petitioners, including BJP leader Subramanian Swamy, argued that the amendment forced a particular economic theory on the nation and violated the original intent of the Constitution. Advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay contended that the Preamble reflects the will of the people at the time of adoption in 1949 and is therefore unalterable.
The court dismissed these objections, affirming that both socialism and secularism are part of the Constitution's Basic Structure. The Bench clarified that socialism refers to a welfare state ensuring equality of opportunity without negating private sector participation or individualism. It emphasised that secularism is embedded in the Constitution, particularly in the principles of equality and fraternity.
Chief Justice Khanna remarked, “Secularism has always been a core feature of the Constitution.” He added that the amendment did not impose socialism as dogma but aligned with the welfare goals enshrined in various constitutional provisions.