Dharwad, May 27: Senior writer Dr HS Shivaprakash opined that in the present context, there is a need to reconstruct both pluralism and oneness in the country.
Speaking on “India of multi-religions” at a two-day 5th May Literary Fest organized by the Ladayi Publication of Gadag, Chittara Balaga of Dharwad and Kavi Publication at Papu Auditorium here on Sunday, he said that “We have forgotten equality and coexistence. Karl Marx had called for powerless society. Unfortunately, corporate forces have been ruling the people in the country. We are in a critical situation where we need to reconstruct both pluralism and oneness”, he added.
Religion was debatable issue since two thousand years. India did not have Hindu religion earlier. When Britishers came to India, Hindu religion was brought into practice like Christianity. Earlier, the concept Hindu was not being used in religious context, but it was being used in related to a particular region or area, he opined.
“There are many schools of thoughts and religions. I have not read Brahma sutra. I have read more on non-Vedic traditions like Sharana, Naatha, Shakhya Sufi and other schools of thoughts. None of these would impose oneness on us. All the Schools of thoughts like Bhakti, Sharana, Naatha, Shakhya Sufi emerged during medieval period had advocated oneness in pluralism or unity in diversity. In Jain tradition, they have a term called ‘Anekantavada’. Each religion would evolve based on their experiences”, he said.
The word ‘Lingayat’ is an indicator of Self, while ‘Veerashaiva’ is an indicator of Practice. Sharana community is an indicator and it was used in Vachanas four thousand times. But the word ‘Hindu’ was not used for a single time. So, there is no question of reviving the Hindu religion there. Vachanas were written in over 40 years by several Vachanakars, communities and people from different professions. Many communities have opened up to the literary field to such an extent that no country or literature in the world has witnessed this development. It was happened only in Karnataka. While collecting the Vachanas, some personal agenda has crept and they were collected as Allama-centric and Bassava-centric vachanas and women writers were neglected, he said.
The factors influenced the people most in this election was neither Hindutva nor secularism. But castes and sub-castes have played major role. More than castes, people and communities have tried to identify themselves as sub-castes, Shivaprakash said.
At the end of the session, a discussion was held. Noted writers Chandrashekar Patil, SG Siddaramaiah, Ramjan Darga, Kalegowda Nagawara and others participated in it.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Mumbai (PTI): Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Aaditya Thackeray on Saturday said that the passage of the women's quota bill would have ensured a "total defeat of democracy", alleging that the legislation, linked with a delimitation exercise, was a political tool designed to reduce the voice of states.
Thackeray, in a post on X, claimed that the Bill would have amended the Constitution for the political means of the ruling regime to increase seats, reduce the voice of many states and enable the gerrymandering of constituencies to ensure unfair victories.
"The very amendment that would have ensured the total defeat of democracy and the Constitution in India stands rejected by the unity of the Opposition MPs," he wrote.
The legislation should have been called "Delimitation to ensure unfair victory Bill", the former minister said, adding that there was a genuine need to enable 33 per cent reservation for women in the current number of seats.
"Now, it is up to the government to ensure that it is implemented in the 543 seats of the Lok Sabha for the 2029 elections and all elections across India, if that is the real intent of the government," he wrote.
A Constitution Amendment Bill to implement reservation for women in legislatures in 2029 and increase the number of Lok Sabha seats was defeated on Friday in the Lower House.
While 298 members voted in support of the Bill, 230 MPs voted against it. Out of 528 members who voted, the Bill required 352 votes for a two-thirds majority.
According to the Constitution Amendment Bill, Lok Sabha seats were to be increased to a maximum of 850 from the current 543 to "operationalise" the women's reservation law before the 2029 parliamentary polls, following a delimitation exercise based on the 2011 Census.
