Bengaluru, April 27: Fulfilling the dream of digital India, candidates are taking the online route to distribute cash to voters, and setting Jan-Dhan accounts jingling. “Half now, half after you vote." That's the promise of the candidates who have been neatly hoodwinking poll officials by making the transfer to voters through the online route, reports The Times Of India.

Trusted lieutenants of candidates collect voters' bank account details and mobile numbers. Later, they call and take a pledge from them to vote for a particular candidate in lieu of Rs 2,000. The first instalment of Rs 1,000 is transferred to the account immediately, and the second is promised after May 12, provided, of course, the candidate wins. Sources in the know said that the candidate does not transfer the money from his personal account but from the accounts of their trusted workers or businessman, giving no room for any suspicion. "Since the fund transfer is in thousands, the income-tax department doesn't spot it,'' said a businessman from Basavanagudi.

The direct benefit transfer or DBT scheme introduced by the Centre for various subsidized welfare schemes seems to have found a new purpose. “The direct cash transfer scheme will not only buy votes but also ensure voter loyalty,” said a trusted aide of a BJP candidate in Bengaluru.

A waiter at a popular bar and restaurant in R T Nagar was surprised when his bank account was suddenly credited with Rs 1,000, but soon he realized that his parents had shared his account and phone details with supporters of a Congress candidate.

There is a ‘family DBT scheme’ too. Chand Pasha (name changed), a resident of Yelahanka, received Rs 5,000, reportedly from a candidate, for his family of five voters. 


The candidate does not transfer the money from his personal account but from the accounts of their trusted workers or businessman, giving no room for any suspicion. “Since the transfer is in thousands, the IT department doesn’t spot it,’’ said a businessman from Basavangudi.

Though the Election Commission is keeping a tab on bank accounts, such transfers are taking place blatantly, thanks to digital gateway payment mobile apps. “It’s hard to prove that the money was deposited to buy votes,” a poll observer appointed by the EC to monitor such cases said.

What has added currency to this ‘direct cash transfer scheme’ is that almost everyone, rural areas included, holds a bank account, thanks to the Jan-Dhan scheme of the Centre.

EC officials claim that they are keeping a strict watch on every transaction taking place with the help of banks, but they still cannot be foolproof. “We too have been receiving such complaints and have increased vigil, though are yet to figure out how to keep track of mobile app payments,” said chief electoral officer Sanjiv Kumar.

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



Prayagraj, Jan 24 (PTI): The Allahabad High Court on Wednesday dismissed a writ petition seeking direction to the state authorities to permit the mounting of loudspeakers on a Masjid.

The court observed that the religious places were for offering prayers, therefore the use of loudspeakers was not a matter of right.

Dismissing the writ petition filed by Pilibhit-resident Mukhtiyar Ahmad, a two judge-bench, comprising Justice Ashwani Kumar Mishra and Justice Donadi Ramesh, observed, "Religious places are for offering prayers to the divinity and use of loudspeakers cannot be claimed as a matter of right, particularly when often such use of loudspeakers create nuisance for the residents".

At the outset, the state counsel objected to the maintainability of the writ on the grounds that the petitioner was neither a mutawalli, nor did the mosque belong to him.

The court also noted that the petitioner did not have locus to file the writ petition.

The term 'locus' is a legal concept that refers to the right of a person or entity to participate in a legal proceeding or bring a lawsuit.