Tejasvi Surya announces Rs 10 Lakh support for families of Pahalgam attack victims from Karnataka
Bengaluru, Apr 28: BJP Yuva Morcha National President and Member of Parliament Tejasvi Surya announced that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) will provide financial assistance of Rs 10 lakh each to the families of Bharat Bhushan and Manjunath, who lost their lives in the recent terrorist attack at Pahalgam in Jammu and Kashmir.
Speaking at a press conference held at the BJP office on Monday, Surya criticised the Congress-led state government for its alleged indifference towards the victims' families. He said that if the state government had shown any sense of humanity, it would have offered at least Rs 1 crore to the bereaved families.
Highlighting the importance of long-term support, Surya pointed out that if the BJP’s financial assistance was deposited in a fixed deposit, the interest generated could support the education and livelihood of the victims' families. He also recalled that the Chief Minister had earlier granted Rs 15 lakh to families affected by an elephant stampede in a neighbouring state and questioned why a higher compensation was not considered for victims of terrorism from Karnataka.
Accusing the Congress party of appeasement politics, Surya said, "We cannot expect more from a party that has sold itself for the Muslim vote." He further urged Hindu society to stand by the victims' families during this difficult time.
Surya also informed that a candlelight march had been organised in Bengaluru South to condemn the terrorist attack. During the event, he had appealed for donations to support the families, suggesting that one rupee more should be collected than the state government’s compensation. He shared that people had already contributed around Rs 20 lakh towards this cause.
On the matter of education, Surya said that RV University had responded positively to his request for assistance. The university has agreed to bear the entire educational expenses of Abhijaya, the son of the late Manjunath, for his B.Com and postgraduate studies. "A formal letter from RV University has been addressed to Pallavi Manjunath, and I will personally deliver it to her," he added.
In solidarity with the victims of the Pahalgam terror attack, the Hindu society of Bengaluru South today has come forward to support the families of Late Shri Manjunath Rao and Late Shri Bharat Bhushan, on my appeal :
— Tejasvi Surya (@Tejasvi_Surya) April 28, 2025
1. ₹10,00,001/- each is being given to both families. ₹1… pic.twitter.com/zyhjdNOi41
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
High courts upheld only 8 per cent of death sentences; SC confirms none in recent years: Report
New Delhi (PTI): Highlighting that a high acquittal rate of death row convicts by the Supreme Court and high courts demonstrates a pattern of "erroneous or unjustified convictions", a study of 10 years of death penalty data has revealed that the top court did not confirm any death sentences in recent years.
The study by Square Circle Clinic, a criminal laws advocacy group with the NALSAR University of Law in Hyderabad, found that an overwhelming majority of death sentences imposed by trial courts did not withstand scrutiny at higher judicial levels. Acquittals far outnumbered confirmations at both the high courts and Supreme Court levels.
According to the report, the trial courts across India awarded 1,310 death sentences in 822 cases between 2016 and 2025. High courts considered 842 of these sentences in confirmation proceedings but upheld only 70 or 8.31 per cent.
In contrast, 258 death sentences (30.64 per cent) resulted in acquittals. The study noted that the acquittal rate at the high court level was nearly four times the confirmation rate.
Data showed that of the 70 death sentences confirmed by high courts, the Supreme Court decided 38 and did not uphold a single one. The apex court has confirmed no death sentences between 2023 and 2025.
"Wrongful or erroneous or unjustified convictions, then, are not random or freak accidents in the Indian criminal justice system. The data indicates they are a persistent and serious systemic concern," the report said.
Over the last decade, high courts adjudicated 1,085 death sentences in 647 cases, confirming only 106 (9.77 per cent). During this period, 326 persons in 191 cases, were acquitted.
The report attributed low confirmation rates to the appellate judiciary’s concerns regarding failures in due process. "This coincides with increased Supreme Court scrutiny of safeguards at the sentencing stage," the report said.
Of the 153 death sentences decided by the apex court over the last decade, the accused were acquitted in 38 cases. In 2025 alone, high courts overturned death sentences into acquittals in 22 out of 85 cases (over 25 per cent). The same year, Supreme Court acquitted accused persons in more than half of the death penalty cases it decided (10 out of 19), the report said.
The study highlighted that 364 persons who were ultimately acquitted "should not even have been convicted and unjustifiably suffered the trauma of death row". It added that such failures extend beyond adjudication and reflect serious lapses in investigation and prosecution.
The question of remedies for wrongful convictions remains pending before the Supreme Court. In September 2025, three persons acquitted by the apex court filed writ petitions seeking compensation from the state and argued that their wrongful convictions violated their fundamental right to life and liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution.
"In 2022, the Supreme Court crystallised a sentencing process in Manoj v. State of Madhya Pradesh , and mandated all courts to follow those guidelines before imposing or confirming a death sentence," the report read.
In 2025, the apex court held in Vasanta Sampat Dupare v. Union of India that death penalty sentencing hearings form part of the right to a fair trial and stressed that capital punishment can be imposed only after a constitutionally compliant sentencing process.
"However, even at the high courts whether the process mandated under Manoj is being complied with is in doubt,” the report said.
