Truckers call off strike after assurance from Karnataka govt
Bengaluru, Apr 17 (PTI): Truckers associated with the Federation of Karnataka State Lorry Owners and Agents Associations (FOKSLOAA) on Thursday called off their strike after state Transport Minister Ramalinga Reddy agreed to most of their demands.
The FOKSLOAA, with 129 truckers’ associations and six lakh members, commenced their protest on Monday night with a host of demands, including a reduction in diesel prices and toll-related problems faced by the truckers.
Transport Minister Reddy confirmed that the strike has been called off.
"I have told them that I would look into most of their demands, including the one related to check posts at the border areas," Reddy told PTI.
He said he has assured the FOKSLOAA delegation that a committee would be formed which will decide within three to four months about the role and responsibility of the check posts.
About the no-entry inside the Bengaluru city, the minister said he will speak to the Bengaluru Police Commissioner.
"I have told the truck drivers to complete their work between 7 AM and 8 AM," Reddy said.
He said he also agreed for the online fine payment for the truckers.
The minister said he has also assured them to set up more centres to renew their driving licence.
"Their demand for diesel price reduction and abolition of toll plaza was unrelated to us. I told them to first speak to the Centre before coming to us," Reddy said.
FOKSLOAA general secretary Somasundaram Balan said the strike has been called off. Except for diesel price reduction and toll related issues, all the demands have been fulfilled, he added.
According to Balan, the minister assured them that tariff charges of trucks will be given to the truckers within a month. A committee would be formed which will fix the rates.
Regarding the toll charges, the FOKSLOAA general secretary said the minister assured the delegation that it will be borne by the consigner or consignee and not the truckers.
FOKSLOAA president G R Shanmugappa told reporters after meeting with the minister that his federation had put forth five issues before the Karnataka government, which were genuine.
"We have raised the issue of border check posts of the Road Transport Office (RTO). These check posts have been removed in most of the states. So why is it still operating in Karnataka? Why is money collected there and why is RTO creating problem there? The minister assured us that within three months the state would take a call on scrapping them after studying the abolition of check posts in Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh," Shanmugappa said.
Regarding the diesel price, Shanmugappa said there were fixed transportation charges for the autorickshaws, hail riding taxis and buses, but no such mechanism existed for trucks for the past 25 years. "The minister has said within a month the rent will be fixed, which is a matter of joy for us," he added.
The representatives of the truckers’ body had twice held discussions with Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and Reddy on Tuesday, which remained inconclusive.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
High courts upheld only 8 per cent of death sentences; SC confirms none in recent years: Report
New Delhi (PTI): Highlighting that a high acquittal rate of death row convicts by the Supreme Court and high courts demonstrates a pattern of "erroneous or unjustified convictions", a study of 10 years of death penalty data has revealed that the top court did not confirm any death sentences in recent years.
The study by Square Circle Clinic, a criminal laws advocacy group with the NALSAR University of Law in Hyderabad, found that an overwhelming majority of death sentences imposed by trial courts did not withstand scrutiny at higher judicial levels. Acquittals far outnumbered confirmations at both the high courts and Supreme Court levels.
According to the report, the trial courts across India awarded 1,310 death sentences in 822 cases between 2016 and 2025. High courts considered 842 of these sentences in confirmation proceedings but upheld only 70 or 8.31 per cent.
In contrast, 258 death sentences (30.64 per cent) resulted in acquittals. The study noted that the acquittal rate at the high court level was nearly four times the confirmation rate.
Data showed that of the 70 death sentences confirmed by high courts, the Supreme Court decided 38 and did not uphold a single one. The apex court has confirmed no death sentences between 2023 and 2025.
"Wrongful or erroneous or unjustified convictions, then, are not random or freak accidents in the Indian criminal justice system. The data indicates they are a persistent and serious systemic concern," the report said.
Over the last decade, high courts adjudicated 1,085 death sentences in 647 cases, confirming only 106 (9.77 per cent). During this period, 326 persons in 191 cases, were acquitted.
The report attributed low confirmation rates to the appellate judiciary’s concerns regarding failures in due process. "This coincides with increased Supreme Court scrutiny of safeguards at the sentencing stage," the report said.
Of the 153 death sentences decided by the apex court over the last decade, the accused were acquitted in 38 cases. In 2025 alone, high courts overturned death sentences into acquittals in 22 out of 85 cases (over 25 per cent). The same year, Supreme Court acquitted accused persons in more than half of the death penalty cases it decided (10 out of 19), the report said.
The study highlighted that 364 persons who were ultimately acquitted "should not even have been convicted and unjustifiably suffered the trauma of death row". It added that such failures extend beyond adjudication and reflect serious lapses in investigation and prosecution.
The question of remedies for wrongful convictions remains pending before the Supreme Court. In September 2025, three persons acquitted by the apex court filed writ petitions seeking compensation from the state and argued that their wrongful convictions violated their fundamental right to life and liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution.
"In 2022, the Supreme Court crystallised a sentencing process in Manoj v. State of Madhya Pradesh , and mandated all courts to follow those guidelines before imposing or confirming a death sentence," the report read.
In 2025, the apex court held in Vasanta Sampat Dupare v. Union of India that death penalty sentencing hearings form part of the right to a fair trial and stressed that capital punishment can be imposed only after a constitutionally compliant sentencing process.
"However, even at the high courts whether the process mandated under Manoj is being complied with is in doubt,” the report said.
