Auto-rickshaw with multiple registration numbers operating for Ola and Rapido sparks safety concerns
Bengaluru: A man took to Twitter to share a photo of an auto-rickshaw that operates for both Ola and Rapido, highlighting an issue with safety. The vehicle was operating with three different registration numbers, including one for the ride-hailing apps and its original registration number. This situation has caused concern among users who worry about how authorities would track these vehicles in case of crimes. Ola responded to the tweet, asking for more information.
The incident has sparked a debate among netizens about the legality of the situation, with some suggesting the driver is moonlighting. This follows a similar incident last month, where a man shared a photo of an Uber auto-rickshaw driver who was also a YouTube influencer.
Suprit posted on Twitter about an incident in E-city, referring to it as another "Peak Bangalore" moment. He shared a photo of an auto-rickshaw that works for both Ola and Rapido, which had three different registration numbers. The vehicle displayed a temporary number plate for the ride-hailing apps and its original registration number was displayed on the number plate
Another #PeakBangalore moment in E-city. How many registrations is too many registrations? @peakbengaluru pic.twitter.com/SaW9hMKBQV
— suprit j (@jadhav_suprit96) April 5, 2023
.
Another woman posted “I always wondered about such different vehicles arriving with different registration numbers when booked through ola. I dread for my safety when this happens! How will @ola_supports or #bangalore traffic police track such vehicles in case of crimes,”
I always wondered on such different vehicle arriving with different registration number when booked through ola.
— Deepa (@DeftyDeepa) April 7, 2023
I dread for my safety when this happens! How will @ola_supports or #banglore traffic police track such vehicles in case of crimes 🤷
In response to a Twitter user's safety concerns regarding an auto-rickshaw with multiple registration numbers operating for Ola and Rapido, the ride-hailing company's support team responded. Ola Support asked the user to provide the CRN (Cab Ride Number) of the ride in question, along with their registered email ID, via direct message (DM). The company's team would then investigate the matter further.
Request you to share the CRN of the ride mentioned along with your registered Email ID via DM so that our team can look into this. https://t.co/6DHSELSc7K
— Ola Support (@ola_supports) April 7, 2023
In the meantime, another netizen raising his concern said, “Is this legal? I expect ola / rapido / uber would use the actual (RTO provided) registration number of the vehicle,” another user commented. “Dude’s moonlighting,” joked another. “Looks like he rented the auto and he has registered OLA/Rapido using previous rentals,” another netizen said.
Is this legal?
— Krishna (@KrisPrajapati) April 5, 2023
I expect ola / rapido / uber would use the actual (RTO provided) registration number of the vehicle.
In a Twitter post last month, a netizen Sushant Koshy shared a unique encounter he had with an Uber auto-rickshaw driver in Bengaluru. The driver, named Janardhan, had put up a banner inside his vehicle advertising his YouTube channel, Gold Janardhan Investor, where he makes videos about personal finance. Koshy shared a photo of the banner, calling it his "peak Bengaluru" moment.
My Uber auto driver today is a YouTube influencer, specialising in personal finance. @peakbengaluru https://t.co/FZJWWzMFhB pic.twitter.com/crM8Im9JOK
— Sushant Koshy (@sushantkoshy) March 3, 2023
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Prasidh, Kuldeep limit South Africa to 270 after De Kock's hundred
Visakhapatnam (PTI): India fought back gallantly through Prasidh Krishna and Kuldeep Yadav after Quinton de Kock struck his 23rd hundred, keeping South Africa to a manageable 270 in the third and series-deciding final ODI, here Saturday.
India won the toss after judging the spin of the coin incorrectly 20 times in a row. They had little hesitation in inserting the Proteas into bat, a clear indication of dew factor dominating the thought.
After Arshdeep Singh sent back Ryan Rickelton early, De Kock (106, 89b, 8x4, 6x4) struck his seventh century against India and put on 113 runs off 124 balls with skipper Temba Bavuma (48, 67b) as the visitors moved to a healthy position.
De Kock was severe on Prasidh (4/66), who erred on length continuously in his first spell (2-0-27-0). The left-hander biffed the pacer for 6, 6, 4 in his second over to milk 18 runs.
The 32-year-old quickly pounced on anything that was short, and pacers Prasidh and Harshit offered him plenty of feed on his pet areas.
Bavuma was more sedate, and made runs through those typical dabs and jabs, occasionally unfurling a drive of elan.
De Kock moved to fifty in 42 balls, and never let the tempo down reaching his hundred in 79 balls.
India found temporary relief when Ravindra Jadeja induced a false slash from Bavuma to get caught by Virat Kohli at point.
The tourists got another move on through a 54-run partnership between De Kock and Matthew Breetzkle for the third wicket, and at 168 for two in 28 overs they were in a good position to press on.
But Breetzke's punishment of part-time spinner Tilak Varma forced a rethink in the Indian camp, as skipper KL Rahul brought back Prasidh for a second spell.
What a masterstroke it turned out to be! The Karnataka man broke the back of South Africa’s top and middle order in an exceptional second spell (4-0-11-3).
Breetzke was the first man to go, trapped plumb in front with a straight one and four balls later Aiden Markram uppishly chipped a fuller delivery to Kohli at short covers.
Prasidh soon castled De Kock, whose ugly cross-batted swipe failed to connect a full length delivery from the pacer.
All of a sudden, SA found themselves at a shaky 199 for five, losing three wickets in the space of three overs.
Once Prasidh was done away with the top and middle-order, left-arm wrist spinner Kuldeep (4/41) took over and mopped up the tail as SA fell short of even a par total on this track.
