Comedian Raju Srivatsav gets trolled as his video of ranting against ‘Tandav’ web series goes viral
Twitterati digs his videos where he is making fun of Hindu gods
New Delhi: Popular Comedian and actor Raju Srivatsav on Tuesday was trolled on social media platforms after a video wherein he is ranting about the ‘Tandav’ web series controversy went viral. Twitter users dug his old videos wherein he is seen making fun of Hindu gods, and called him a hypocrite.
In the video released by Raju Srivatsav, he is seen slamming the cast and crew of ‘Tandav’ including Saif Ali Khan for “strategically hatching a conspiracy against Hindu religion” and making fun of Hindu god.
He also dared the makers and producers of web series’ to make controversial content on other religions adding that they are scared that their heads will be chopped off. He also specifically targeted actor Saif Ali Khan adding that he has repeatedly done acts of making fun of Hindu religion and gods.
“It is high time that the Hindus in this country wake up. People are now demanding the scene to be deleted from the ‘Tandav’ web series. That is not enough, we should give them strict punishment. We should get a law in place that will restrict everybody to not try and do things like this” Raju is seen saying in the video.
Twitter users were quick to take note of the video and dug into the past and brought to the fore multiple videos of Raju Srivatsav wherein he himself is seen making fun of Hindu gods and religion.
In a video shared by Md Asif Khan, captioned “Virat Hindu vs Comedian, Raju Srivatsav in a movie is seen making fun of Lord Krishna. Users also shared other videos of the comedian wherein as a part of his standup comedy Raju had made fun of Hindu gods.
Virat Hindu Vs Comedian pic.twitter.com/PzNNEZ8DFv
— Md Asif Khan (@imMAK02) January 19, 2021
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
K’taka HC declines stay on menstrual leave order, says issue of public importance
Bengaluru: The State Government has strongly defended its decision to grant one day of paid menstrual leave every month to women employees, telling the Karnataka High Court that the notification was issued in the larger interest of women and is legally sound. The Court, treating the matter as one of significant public importance, refused to stay the implementation of the order and adjourned the hearing to January 20.
The Labour Department’s November 20, 2025 notification was challenged by the Bangalore Hotels Association, Avirat Defence System, Facile Aerospace Technologies Ltd and Samos Technologies Ltd. Justice Jyoti Mulimani heard the petitions on Wednesday.
At the start of the hearing, the bench asked whether the State had filed its objections. Advocate General K. Shashikiran Shetty informed the Court that objections had been submitted and that copies would be provided to the petitioners.
Defending the notification, the Advocate General said the government had introduced a progressive measure aimed at women’s welfare, one that no other state in India had implemented so far. He told the Court that 72 objections were received and considered before finalising the notification. He argued that the government was empowered to frame such policy under Article 42 of the Constitution and noted that the Supreme Court and the Law Commission had earlier made recommendations in this direction.
ALSO READ: MP Brijesh Chowta urges centre to grant point of call status to Mangaluru airport
When the Court asked whether the notification applied to all sectors, the Advocate General replied in the affirmative. The bench observed that the matter required detailed hearing because of its wider public impact and decided to take it up in January. The Court added that petitioners may file their responses to the State’s objections before the next hearing.
Petitioners’ counsel B.K. Prashanth requested that the State be restrained from enforcing the order until the case is decided. The Advocate General responded that the government had already begun implementing the notification across all sectors.
Justice Mulimani noted that nothing would change between now and the next hearing and emphasised that the Court would consider all arguments thoroughly before issuing any direction. The bench then adjourned the matter to January 20 and asked petitioners to file any additional applications with copies to the State’s counsel.
