Playground restored to children, thanks to Rajanna
Rampant encroaching of public property by religious institutions, corporate houses, private entities and other powers has been a major issue in all fast growing cities. Bengaluru is no exception. One particular case of encroachment of public land in erstwhile Bharatinagar constituency (currently, Sarvagnanagar) was resolved only last year.
The land in question measures Four acres, 3 guntas on CTS No.1378 which houses the Indian Gyamkhana Club. The Club has been sitting on this land since its establishment in 1932 during the erstwhile British Raj period. This land of Four acres, 3 guntas were leased to the Club in 1932 by the then City Municipality for a period of 5 years. Subsequently the lease was renewed by the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) in the years 1937, 1954, 1969, 1978, 1994 and 2008.
In 1994, the BBMP attempted to reduce the lease area to 1acre 8 guntas and restore the rest for civic and public purposes. However, the State Government, directed the BBMP to lease the entire land to the Club for 35 years for an annual fee of Rs. 2,800 per square feet. for every acre up to 2008.
In 2008, upon the termination of the lease, the Ho’ble Supreme Court held that 1 acre 8 guntas be leased to Indian Gymkhana at the rate of Rs.2,800/- per sq.ft. and the remaining land be used for Community Sports and Public Use.
However, in 2010, the government directed Indian Gymkhana to pay a lease amount of Rs.60,000/- for every acre of leased land of 4 acres 21 guntas and the lease to be renewed once in 3 years at 15% for a period of 35 years
It was then that Vidhana Sabha Member and x-MLA of Bharatinagar constituency, N Rajanna questioned the above order of the Government stating that it was against the 2008 guidelines of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and submitted a complaint in 2014 to Hon’ble Lokayukata to conduct an enquiry. Hon’ble Lokayukta sought the opinion of the Law Department of whether the Government had the authority to lease out public property to private entities.
It was found that the Government did not have the authority to lease away property of the Corporation for a lesser rent. Accordingly, a report was submitted by Upa Lokayukta to withdraw the Government order.
Rajanna further submitted in 2014 that the property leased to Indian Gymkhana is worth several crores and the land should be used for public use and for children’s ground.
In 2015, the Government order leased 1 acre 8 guntas to Indian Gymkhana at Rs.2,800/- per sq.ft. and for an yearly lease of Rs.1,46,36,160/-.
Questioning the Government Order of 2015 and the order of the Upa Lokayukta of 2014 and letter dated 2014, Indian Gymkhana filed in writ in WP No. 45070/2015 wherein the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka directed the Government to reconsider the matter. However, the learned AAG submitted that the matter will be heard by Additional Chief Secretary, Urban Development Department on 3/10/2016.
IN April 2017, Additional Chief Secretary, Urban Development Department proposed a resolution wherein it was held that the lease shall be fixed for the portion where the old club is situated and facilities situated with prior approval of BBMP and such areas needed for reasonable usage of the above structures. The balance area shall be used as playground for public and Club Association among others.
Indian Gymkhana filed a writ in WP No 21179/2017 questioning the above order which was dismissed by Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka on 31/8/2018
Finally in 2022 the Government vide GO order: NaAaEe 152 MNG 2014 stated that out of 4 acres 21 guntas, 3 acres 13 guntas will be used for children’s park and public use. 1 acre 8 guntas is to be leased to Indian Gymkhana Club. And stated that the Club will have to have pay the amount due since 2008 at Rs. 5,99,53,31,544.66 for unauthroised usage of 3 acres 13 guntas and Rs. 2,16,37,28,677.77 towards lease amount and interest for usage of 1 acre 8 guntas to BBMP. Further, the lease amount for 2020-21 shall be decided by BBMP and BBMP shall take possession of the balance land measuring 3 acres 13 guntas.
Since then, the BBMP took back 3 acres 13 guntas and is maintaining it as a playground for the public.
Girish Linganna
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
SC stays CBI probe into West Bengal govt officials' role in teacher recruitment scam
New Delhi, Apr 29: The Supreme Court on Monday stayed a Calcutta High Court order directing the CBI to probe the role of West Bengal government officials in a teacher recruitment scam. It, however, refused to stay for now the cancellation of the appointment of over 25,000 teachers and non-teaching staff.
The top court was hearing a plea by the West Bengal government against a high court order invalidating the appointment of 25,753 teachers and non-teaching staff made by the School Service Commission (SSC) in state-run and state-aided schools.
A bench of Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice Manoj Misra, however, refused to stay the high court order cancelling the appointments and said it will hear the matter on May 6.
Observing that taking away the jobs of about 25,000 persons is a serious matter, the top court asked if it is possible to segregate the valid and invalid appointments on the basis of the material available and who the beneficiaries of the fraud are.
"We will stay the direction which says the CBI (Central Bureau of Investigation) will undertake further investigation against officials in the state government," the bench said.
Calcutta High Court had said the CBI would undertake further investigations with regard to the persons in the state government involved in approving the creation of supernumerary posts to accommodate illegal appointments.
If necessary, the CBI will undertake custodial interrogation of such persons involved, it had said.
Challenging the order, the state government, in its appeal filed before the top court, said the high court cancelled the appointments "arbitrarily".
"The high court failed to appreciate the ramification of cancelling the entire selection process, leading to straightaway termination of teaching and non-teaching staff from service with immediate effect, without giving sufficient time to the petitioner state to deal with such an exigency, rendering the education system at a standstill," the plea said.
Calcutta High Court last week declared the selection process as "null and void" and directed the CBI to probe the appointment process. It also asked the central agency to submit a report within three months.
"All appointments granted in the selection processes involved being violative of articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, are declared null and void and cancelled," the high court said in its April 22 order.
The high court said those appointed outside the officially available 24,640 vacancies, appointed after the expiry of the official date of recruitment, and those who submitted blank Optical Mark Recognition (OMR) sheets but obtained appointment to return all remunerations and benefits received by them with 12 per cent interest per annum within four weeks.
Observing that it had given "anxious consideration to the passionate plea" that persons who obtained the appointments legally would be prejudiced if the entire selection process was cancelled, the bench said it hardly had any choice left.
The high court held that all appointments involved were violative of articles 14 (equality before law) and 16 (prohibiting discrimination in employment in any government office) of the Constitution.
"It is shocking that, at the level of the cabinet of the state government, a decision is taken to protect employment obtained fraudulently in a selection process conducted by SSC for state-funded schools, knowing fully well that, such appointments were obtained beyond the panel and after expiry of the panel, at the bare minimum," the high court had said.
It said unless "there is a deep connection between the persons perpetuating the fraud and the beneficiaries" with persons involved in the decision-making process, such action to create supernumerary posts to protect illegal appointments is "inconceivable".
The division bench had also rejected a prayer by some appellants, including the SSC, for a stay on the order and asked the commission to initiate a fresh appointment process within a fortnight from the date of the results of the ongoing Lok Sabha elections.
The bench, constituted by the high court chief justice on a direction of the Supreme Court, had heard 350 petitions and appeals relating to the selection of candidates for appointment by the SSC in the categories of teachers of classes 9, 10, 11 and 12 and group-C and D staffers through the SLST-2016.
In its 282-page judgment, the high court had said retaining appointees selected through "such a dubious process" would be contrary to public interest.
