"Ee saala meme namdu” - RCB’s win breaks the internet along with the curse
Bengaluru: Eighteen years. That is how long Royal Challengers Bangalore fans waited. While most were patient, few were outspoken. RCB fans' commitment remained strong and kept the hope alive.
And on June 3, the glorious night when the final ball was bowled and RCB lifted their maiden IPL trophy, it wasn’t just the stadium that erupted. The entire internet went into meltdown mode, and somewhere deep inside Memeistan, a million tabs were opened.
For years, RCB memes had been the butt of every IPL joke. From the legendary “Ee Saala Cup Namde” being recycled with cruel creativity each season, to Kohli’s expressive frustration being turned into GIFs that said everything and nothing, RCB fandom was as much a test of humour as it was of loyalty.
Tables turned this year. Karma clapped. And the meme mill, like a Bangalorean after two filter coffees, went into overdrive.
The song, “Aisa pehli baar hua hai 17, 18 saloun mai” from a Salman Khan’s movie ‘Har dil ju pyar karega’ sounded like it was created for this very moment.
Since last night the internet is flooded with memes and comments. One such comment was, “What do we do now? We can’t joke about RCB anymore.” For a generation raised on RCB jokes, this sudden victory felt like someone swapped their daily heartbreak with a plot twist.
More than a decade long slogan of “Ee Saala Cup Namde” was not expressed in complete faith and hope.Now the slogan is rebranded to “Ee Saala Cup Namdu.”
A carousel on instagram shows prominent political figures with some witty meme, proving once again the uncanny ability of the internet users to mix sports,sarcasm and politics.
One such carousel shows a familiar face known for avoiding the real questions from real media with the caption, “Ab tu Bangalore bhi IPL jeet gayi… aap press conference kab karenge?”
(Even Bangalore has won the IPL now… when will you hold a press conference?)
Another one features the image of a well-known opposition leader with the caption, “Ab tu Bangalore bhi IPL jeet gayi… aap election kab jeetoge?”
(Even Bangalore has finally won the IPL…when will you win an election?)
While Instagram reels and Twitter threads are flooded with tributes to King Kohli, the meme factory is focused on RCB’s loyal fan following.
But beyond the memes and jokes, this win did something extraordinary. It united every cricket fan who deep down, wanted RCB to win at least once. It was the story of persistence, belief and memes that aged gracefully.
The internet, which once laughed at RCB, laughed with them now, turning the punch line into applause.
So, let the hangover continue for another 365. And as for the memes? They’re still rolling in, only this time, they don’t sting. They sparkle.
After all, when the wait for a trophy is more than a decade, the only thing more glorious than the win itself, is watching the world meme it with love.
View this post on Instagram
View this post on Instagram
View this post on Instagram
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Single higher education regulator bill tabled in LS; Oppn flags ‘centralisation,' JPC likely
New Delhi: A bill to set up a 13-member body to regulate institutions of higher education was introduced in the Lok Sabha on Monday.
Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan introduced the Viksit Bharat Shiksha Adhishthan Bill, which seeks to establish an overarching higher education commission along with three councils for regulation, accreditation, and ensuring academic standards for universities and higher education institutions in India.
Meanwhile, the move drew strong opposition, with members warning that it could weaken institutional autonomy and result in excessive centralisation of higher education in India.
The Viksit Bharat Shiksha Adhishthan Bill, 2025, earlier known as the Higher Education Council of India (HECI) Bill, has been introduced in line with the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020.
The proposed legislation seeks to merge three existing regulatory bodies, the University Grants Commission (UGC), the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), and the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE), into a single unified body called the Viksit Bharat Shiksha Adhishthan.
At present, the UGC regulates non-technical higher education institutions, the AICTE oversees technical education, and the NCTE governs teacher education in India.
Under the proposed framework, the new commission will function through three separate councils responsible for regulation, accreditation, and the maintenance of academic standards across universities and higher education institutions in the country.
According to the Bill, the present challenges faced by higher educational institutions due to the multiplicity of regulators having non-harmonised regulatory approval protocols will be done away with.
The higher education commission, which will be headed by a chairperson appointed by the President of India, will cover all central universities and colleges under it, institutes of national importance functioning under the administrative purview of the Ministry of Education, including IITs, NITs, IISc, IISERs, IIMs, and IIITs.
At present, IITs and IIMs are not regulated by the University Grants Commission (UGC).
Government to refer bill to JPC; Oppn slams it
The government has expressed its willingness to refer it to a joint committee after several members of the Lok Sabha expressed strong opposition to the Bill, stating that they were not given time to study its provisions.
Responding to the opposition, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said the government intends to refer the Bill to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) for detailed examination.
Congress Lok Sabha MP Manish Tewari warned that the Bill could result in “excessive centralisation” of higher education. He argued that the proposed law violates the constitutional division of legislative powers between the Union and the states.
According to him, the Bill goes beyond setting academic standards and intrudes into areas such as administration, affiliation, and the establishment and closure of university campuses. These matters, he said, fall under Entry 25 of the Concurrent List and Entry 32 of the State List, which cover the incorporation and regulation of state universities.
Tewari further stated that the Bill suffers from “excessive delegation of legislative power” to the proposed commission. He pointed out that crucial aspects such as accreditation frameworks, degree-granting powers, penalties, institutional autonomy, and even the supersession of institutions are left to be decided through rules, regulations, and executive directions. He argued that this amounts to a violation of established constitutional principles governing delegated legislation.
Under the Bill, the regulatory council will have the power to impose heavy penalties on higher education institutions for violating provisions of the Act or related rules. Penalties range from ₹10 lakh to ₹75 lakh for repeated violations, while establishing an institution without approval from the commission or the state government could attract a fine of up to ₹2 crore.
Concerns were also raised by members from southern states over the Hindi nomenclature of the Bill. N.K. Premachandran, an MP from the Revolutionary Socialist Party representing Kollam in Kerala, said even the name of the Bill was difficult to pronounce.
He pointed out that under Article 348 of the Constitution, the text of any Bill introduced in Parliament must be in English unless Parliament decides otherwise.
DMK MP T.M. Selvaganapathy also criticised the government for naming laws and schemes only in Hindi. He said the Constitution clearly mandates that the nomenclature of a Bill should be in English so that citizens across the country can understand its intent.
Congress MP S. Jothimani from Tamil Nadu’s Karur constituency described the Bill as another attempt to impose Hindi and termed it “an attack on federalism.”
_vb_22.jpeg)
