Veteran Indian pacer Praveen Kumar announces retirement from all forms of cricket
Wants to become bowling coach
Mumbai, Oct 20: Praveen Kumar, one of the more fascinating characters to have played for India in the last decade or so, has decided to retire from all forms of the game after 13 years of competitive cricket. He will now only play company cricket for ONGC and desires to become a bowling coach.
“I have no regrets. Dil se khela, dil sey bowling daala (I played and bowled with my heart). There are good bowlers waiting in the wings back in UP and I don’t want their careers to be affected. Mein khelunga toh ek ka jagah jayega, (If I play, one spot would go); it’s important to think of other players’ future as well. My time is over and I have accepted it. I’m happy and thankful to god for giving me this chance,” Kumar told The Indian Express.
“I want to become a bowling coach. People know that I have this knowledge. I think it’s a area which I can work dil se, I can pass on this experience to the young ones,” he said.
The combination of pride, vulnerability, elements of a free-spirited mast maula, and though he strived to present an emotional toughness, a deeply emotional persona jostled in him. Quick to hurt, quick to forgive, and a homegrown philosophy developed in life in Meerut saw him emerge as one of colourful cricketers of his time. A fan of the writer on underworld, Hussain Zaidi, he has a penchant to quote Chanakya but at the same breath he would say, “mobile mey acha lagta hai yeh quotes, asli zindagi kuch aur hai yaar!”. He is the kind of a person who, as he did once in Australia, uprooted stumps at a training session to defend his friend Rohit Sharma, who was being heckled by unruly fans.
He knew he had the art to bend the ball as he willed it, he knew he was street smart enough to push himself against the best and at times would be left bemused when batsmen successfully took him on. On his best days, he could make the ball talk: he would deliver from close to the stumps and get the ball to curve back in late. He could bowl yorkers, slower ones and had the self-confidence to try bowling short at the likes of Ricky Ponting in Australia. There were many days to remember, some to forget as well.
The sad times came when he was left in wilderness due to an illness after the 2011 world cup. After a vulnerable period, he was back on track with help from Rohit, who convinced of his skills, got him an IPL contract with Mumbai Indians. “Dost hai, mera brother hai. Tamam zindagi nahi bhoolonga (He is my friend, brother. Won’t ever forget his help all my life).” he had once said.
Hailed as a “magician” by Manoj Prabhakar, the UP pacer made his India debut in 2007 and played his last game in 2012. He picked 27 wickets in six Tests, with a five-for at Lord’s. Despite being the main bowler for India on the that tour, he never played a Test again. The year after he couldn’t make to the 2011 World Cup due to an injury – that miss still gnaws him- he was hit by dengue and had to miss out cricket for a while.
But after IPL revival, he made his peace with the way his career went in the last two years. “I have decided to retire from cricket. The decision is not taken in haste, I gave a thought over it and I felt it was a right time to say goodbye to the sport which gave me so much. I want to thank my family, BCCI, UPCA, Rajeev (Shukla) sir for giving me the opportunity to fulfill my dreams,” Kumar says.
One of his highlights remain the 2012 England Test tour and he brushes aside his own performances there, preferring to talk about how it would have been different for India had Zaheer Khan stayed fit. “Had Zak bhai hadn’t been injured Tests matches ka rukh kuch aur he hota, I still feel about it. And I can’t forget the CB series which we won in Australia, probably it was the highest point in my career,” he recalls.
In the here and now, even as he would continue playing for ONGC, the long-term goal is to become a bowling coach. “People tell me that I have this ability to share whatever I know about bowling to others. I want to become a bowling coach.”
Courtesy: indianexpress.com
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
'Fraud on Constitution': SC rules against religious conversion for quota benefits
New Delhi (PTI): In a significant verdict, the Supreme Court has said religious conversions undertaken solely to avail reservation benefits without genuine belief amounted to a "fraud on the Constitution".
Justices Pankaj Mithal and R Mahadevan passed the verdict on November 26 in a case filed by one C Selvarani and upheld a Madras High Court decision of January 24 denying a scheduled caste certificate to a woman who converted to Christianity but later claimed to be a Hindu to secure employment benefits.
Justice Mahadevan, who wrote the 21-page verdict for the bench, further underscored that one converted to a different religion, when they were genuinely inspired by its principles, tenets and spiritual thoughts.
"However, if the purpose of conversion is largely to derive the benefits of reservation but not with any actual belief in the other religion, the same cannot be permitted, as the extension of benefits of reservation to people with such ulterior motives will only defeat the social ethos of the policy of reservation,” he noted.
The evidence presented before the bench was found to have clearly demonstrated that the appellant professed Christianity and actively practiced the faith by attending church regularly.
"Despite the same, she claims to be a Hindu and seeks for a SC community certificate for the purpose of employment," it noted.
"Such a dual claim made by her," said the bench "was untenable and she cannot continue to identify herself as a Hindu after baptism".
The top court, therefore, held the conferment of scheduled caste communal status to the woman, who was a Christian by faith, but claimed to be still embracing Hinduism only for the purpose of availing reservation in employment, "would go against the very object of reservation and would amount to fraud on the Constitution".
The top court underlined a religious conversion solely to access reservation benefits, without genuine belief in the adopted religion, undermined the fundamental social objectives of the quota policy and her actions were contrary to the spirit of reservation policies aimed at uplifting the marginalised communities.
Selvarani, born to a Hindu father and a Christian mother, was baptised as a Christian shortly after birth but later claimed to be a Hindu and sought an SC certificate to apply for an upper division clerk position in Puducherry in 2015.
While her father belonged to the Valluvan caste, categorised under scheduled castes, he had converted to Christianity, as confirmed by documentary evidence.
The verdict said the appellant continued to practice Christianity, as seen by the regular church attendance, making her claim of being a Hindu untenable.
The bench noted individuals converting to Christianity lose their caste identity and must provide compelling evidence of reconversion and acceptance by their original caste to claim SC benefits.
The judgement said there was no substantial evidence of the appellant's reconversion to Hinduism or acceptance by the Valluvan caste.
Her claims lacked public declarations, ceremonies, or credible documentation to substantiate her assertions, it pointed out.
"One converts to a different religion when genuinely inspired by its principles. Conversion purely for reservation benefits, devoid of belief, is impermissible," the bench held.
The apex court opined in any case, upon conversion to Christianity, one lost their caste and couldn't be identified by it.
"As the factum of reconversion is disputed, there must be more than a mere claim. The conversion had not happened by any ceremony or through 'Arya Samaj'. No public declaration was effected. There is nothing on record to show that she or her family has reconverted to Hinduism and on the contrary, there is a factual finding that the appellant still professes Christianity,” it noted.
The bench said there was evidence against the appellant, and therefore, her contention raised that the caste would be under eclipse upon conversion and resumption of the caste upon reconversion, was "unsustainable".
