Bill Gates, Pfizer CEO to stand trial in Netherlands over alleged COVID-19 vaccine injuries
(Based on reports by cairnsnews.com and The Defender)
A Dutch court has ruled that Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft and leading global philanthropist, will face trial in the Netherlands following a lawsuit involving COVID-19 vaccine injuries. The case, which includes multiple other high-profile defendants, claims that the vaccines were unsafe and had negative health impacts on the plaintiffs. This development has been largely covered by local Dutch sources, with outlets like De Telegraaf and independent platforms Zebra Inspiratie bringing attention to the case. However, major international news networks have not widely reported the matter.
According to cairnsnews.com, the lawsuit was originally filed in the District Court of Leeuwarden, the Netherlands. In it, seven Dutch citizens allege that Bill Gates, along with former Dutch Prime Minister and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, Pfizer CEO Dr. Albert Bourla, and members of the Netherlands’ COVID-19 Outbreak Management Team, knowingly misrepresented the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. This group, who self-identify as “corona skeptics,” believes the defendants disregarded potential health risks, leading to significant physical harm among those who received the vaccine. The Defender, another independent media platform cited in the cairnsnews.com report, indicates that one plaintiff has died, leaving six to continue the case.
The court’s jurisdiction over Gates was challenged, as his representatives argued he resides in the United States and should not be subject to Dutch legal proceedings. However, the Leeuwarden court ruled on October 16 that it does hold jurisdiction, given the “connected” nature of the claims against Gates and the other defendants and the fact that the case pertains to issues that directly affect Dutch citizens. As per De Andere Krant, Gates will now be responsible for legal fees totaling approximately €1,406.
The plaintiffs’ primary contention, as outlined in cairnsnews.com and The Defender, is that Gates and other officials promoted the vaccine without adequate transparency about its risks. Dutch independent journalist Erica Krikke told The Defender that the plaintiffs argue Gates’ foundation played a role in shaping COVID-19 policies globally and in the Netherlands. In response, they are now asking for legal redress, claiming they were misled about the vaccine's safety, and that injuries resulted from this alleged misinformation.
The cairnsnews.com report highlights that Gates is represented in the Netherlands by Pels Rijcken, the country’s largest litigation firm, based in The Hague. This firm, which did not contest the basis of the claims, focused instead on challenging the court’s jurisdiction over Gates, given his American residency. Other defendants, including Pfizer’s Dr. Bourla, did not dispute Dutch jurisdiction.
During the September 18 hearing, plaintiffs’ statements were made before the court. According to Zebra Inspiratie, one of the plaintiffs, unable to speak due to health complications from the vaccine, was represented by her father, who gave an emotional account of her declining health post-vaccination. Krikke shared that this testimony led to a reflective pause from the judge, indicating the impact of these personal stories on the legal proceedings.
The case also raises broader issues about the global COVID-19 vaccination drive, with plaintiffs arguing that the defendants' support for the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) "Great Reset" agenda may have influenced their actions. The Leeuwarden court ruling includes references to the Gates Foundation’s affiliation with the WEF, which advocates for “centralized, global intervention” to manage crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Defender also quotes New Zealand-based independent journalist Penny Marie, who has closely followed this case. Marie expressed hope that the Dutch court’s decision to proceed with this case will set a precedent for similar lawsuits worldwide, particularly those against individuals involved in large-scale public health policies. Marie believes the ruling may support other plaintiffs’ efforts to bring international figures to trial in their respective countries, even if those defendants are not based locally.
This lawsuit, according to cairnsnews.com, serves as a rare instance in which vaccine injury claims against global figures, including Gates, have advanced in court. Dutch attorney Meike Terhorst, however, remains cautious, noting that previous lawsuits related to COVID-19 policies in the Netherlands have seen limited success. She pointed out that many judges in the Netherlands tend to support vaccination programs, which could present challenges for this case’s outcome.
Both cairnsnews.com and The Defender also reference Pfizer’s admission in its COVID-19 mRNA documents that shingles, a condition reported by some vaccine recipients, could be linked to the vaccine. The World Health Organization has previously designated shingles as similar to Monkeypox, a virus declared a “public health emergency of international concern” on August 14, 2024.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Trump says EU has until July 4 to approve last year's trade deal or it will face higher tariffs
Washington (AP): President Donald Trump has said in a social media post that goods from the European Union would face higher tariff rates if the 27-member bloc fails to approve last year's trade framework by July 4.
The announcement on Thursday appeared to be a deadline extension after the president said last Friday that EU autos would face a higher 25 per cent tariff starting this week. Trump made the updated announcement after what he described as a "great call" with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.
Still, the US president was displeased that the European Parliament had yet to finalize the trade arrangement reached last year, which was further complicated in February by the US Supreme Court ruling that Trump lacked the legal authority to declare an economic emergency to impose the initial tariffs used to pressure the EU into talks.
"A promise was made that the EU would deliver their side of the Deal and, as per Agreement, cut their Tariffs to ZERO!" Trump posted. "I agreed to give her until our Country's 250th Birthday or, unfortunately, their Tariffs would immediately jump to much higher levels."
It was unclear from the post whether Trump was implying that the tariff rates would jump on all EU goods or the increase would only apply to autos.
His latest statement indicates he might be backing away from his earlier threat on EU autos by giving the European Parliament several more weeks to approve the agreement.
Under the original terms of the framework, the US would charge a 15 per cent tax on most goods imported from the EU.
But since the Supreme Court ruling, the administration has levied a 10 per cent tariff while investigating trade imbalances and national security issues, aiming to put in new tariffs to make up for lost revenues.
