Canada affirms support for India's territorial integrity amid diplomatic tensions
New Delhi: In a significant diplomatic statement, Canada has reaffirmed its commitment to respecting India’s territorial integrity, signaling a potential thaw in relations strained by last year's allegations involving the killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a prominent figure in the Khalistan separatist movement.
Canada's Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs, David Morrison, made the declaration during a foreign interference commission hearing in Ottawa over the weekend. "Canada's policy is very clear that India's territorial integrity must be respected. There's one India, and that's been made very clear," Morrison stated. This is the first formal statement of this kind since diplomatic ties between the two countries soured over allegations made by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in 2023.
The rift between the two nations was triggered when Trudeau accused Indian government agents of being "potentially" involved in the murder of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a Canadian citizen and leader of the banned Khalistan Tiger Force. Nijjar, one of India’s most-wanted terrorists, was fatally shot by unknown assailants outside a gurdwara in Surrey, British Columbia, in June 2023. India had rejected Trudeau's allegations, calling them "absurd" and "politically motivated."
While reaffirming Canada's support for India's territorial sovereignty, Morrison also addressed the contentious issue of pro-Khalistan elements within Canada. He acknowledged that while the activities of these groups may be "awful" to some, they remain "lawful" under Canada's protection of freedom of speech. "There are things that many of us do not want to see, but they are protected by law," he added.
Morrison's remarks about “One India” were interpreted as a clear signal of Ottawa’s desire to mend ties with New Delhi, especially as the relationship between the two nations has experienced a sharp decline over the past year. The statement was also seen as an effort to distance the Canadian government from the stance of Khalistani separatists, many of whom are Canadian citizens.
Diplomatic relations between India and Canada reached a low point after Trudeau's initial allegations and Canada's perceived tolerance of pro-Khalistan activists. Trade talks were derailed, and a series of mutual diplomatic actions followed. In June 2023, the Canadian Parliament observed a moment of silence in memory of Nijjar, which further aggravated tensions. India responded by organizing a memorial in Vancouver to honor the 329 victims of the 1985 Air India bombing, perpetrated by Khalistani terrorists.
Despite these tensions, Canada has been attempting to reach out to India, especially since the re-election of Prime Minister Narendra Modi earlier this year. Trudeau expressed hope for resuming discussions on “serious issues” concerning national security, the rule of law, and safeguarding Canadian citizens.
India has long voiced concerns about Canada becoming a hub for pro-Khalistan separatist activities, accusing the country of providing political space for such movements. In response to the Nijjar killing, Canada arrested four Indian nationals as part of its ongoing investigation, but New Delhi has consistently stated that "political interests" are influencing the situation.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Sujit Nair raises concerns over speculation of DMK-AIADMK understanding to block TVK
Chennai: Journalist and political commentator Sujit Nair has expressed concern over speculation that the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam and the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam could explore a post-poll understanding to prevent Vijay-led Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam from forming the government in Tamil Nadu.
In a social media post, Sujit Nair said the election verdict in Tamil Nadu reflected a clear public demand for political change and argued that the mandate should be respected irrespective of political preferences.
Referring to reports and political discussions surrounding a possible understanding between the DMK and AIADMK, he said he hoped such developments remained only speculative conversations and did not turn into reality.
Nair stated that if such an alliance were to take shape, it would raise serious questions about ideological politics in the country. He said TVK had emerged through a democratic electoral process and that the legitimacy to govern in a parliamentary democracy comes from the people’s verdict.
According to him, attempts to prevent an electoral winner from forming the government through unexpected political arrangements may be constitutionally valid, but many people could view them as politically opportunistic.
He further said that such a move could particularly affect the political image of the DMK, which has historically projected itself around ideology, social justice and opposition politics. Nair said that in ideological terms, the DMK appeared closer to TVK than to the AIADMK, and joining hands with its long-time political rival only to remain in power could weaken its broader political narrative.
He added that the same questions would apply to the AIADMK as well, as the party had spent decades positioning itself against the DMK and such an arrangement could create discomfort among its cadre and supporters.
Drawing a comparison with Maharashtra politics in 2019, Nair said he had expressed similar views when the Shiv Sena formed an alliance with the Indian National Congress and the Nationalist Congress Party after the Assembly elections.
He said post-poll alliances between long-standing political rivals often create a public perception that ideology and electoral mandates become secondary when political power equations come into play.
Nair also said such developments increase public cynicism towards politics and reinforce the belief among voters that ideology is often sidelined after elections.
He maintained that the Tamil Nadu verdict was emphatic and said respecting both the spirit and substance of the mandate was important for the credibility of democratic politics.
