We are shocked at glaring double standards of world at catastrophe unfolding in Gaza: Jordan's Queen
Rania Al Abdullah is Queen of Jordan and the wife of King Abdullah II. Queen Rania is herself of Palestinian descent. She was interviewed recently by CNN’s Christiane Amanpour. Below are the excerpts from the interview:
Anchor: Jordan is home to 40% of the total registered Palestinian refugees in the Middle East according to the UN. That is simply a huge number especially for a small country. Can I ask you first as an Arab, as a Palestinian as a human being, being a mother, how you're feeling ever since October 7th?
Queen Rania: We have witnessed Palestinian mothers forced to write their children's names on their hands, fearing the high likelihood of deadly shelling. It's crucial to remind the world that these Palestinian mothers love their children just as fiercely as any other mother worldwide. The unimaginable ordeal they are enduring is beyond belief. People across the Middle East, including Jordan, are profoundly shocked and dismayed by the world's response to this unfolding catastrophe over the past few weeks.
A glaring double standard has become apparent. When the incident occurred on October 7th, the world swiftly and unequivocally supported Israel's right to defend itself, condemning the attack. However, in the recent weeks, there has been a disturbing silence. Countries have limited their response to expressing concern and acknowledging casualties, always prefaced with declarations of support for Israel. The hypocrisy is staggering. We are told it's wrong to kill an entire family at gunpoint, yet shelling them to death is somehow acceptable. This double standard is deeply shocking to the Arab world.
This marks the first instance in modern history where such widespread human suffering is met with a lack of international outcry. The absence of calls for a ceasefire is deafening. To many in our region, this silence implicates the Western world, implying complicity through their support and cover for Israel's actions under the guise of self-defense. In the eyes of many in the Arab world, the West isn't merely tolerating this situation but actively aiding and abetting it. This reality is horrendous and profoundly disappointing to all of us.
Anchor: I want to express the deep shock felt by Israelis. What they have experienced has been unprecedented since the Holocaust. I would like to hear your thoughts on how you felt on October 7th
Queen Rania: Of course, I was shocked, and Jordan has unequivocally stated its position. We condemn the killing of any civilian, whether Palestinian or Israeli. This stance aligns with Jordan's ethical and moral principles and reflects the teachings of Islam. Islam expressly condemns the killing of civilians. As my husband recently mentioned, The Pact of Umar, issued at the Gates of Jerusalem 15 centuries ago, a millennium before the Geneva Conventions, commands Muslims not to harm or kill women, children, or the elderly, and not to harm priests or destroy trees. These are the rules of engagement during times of war, applicable to all parties involved.
It is disheartening to observe the lack of equal attention to the ongoing situation. I want to emphasize that this conflict did not initiate on October 7th, despite the portrayal. Most media outlets are covering the story under the headline 'Israel at War.' However, for many Palestinians living on the other side of the separation wall, beyond the barbed wire, war has never ceased. This is a 75-year-old story of overwhelming death and displacement for the Palestinian people. It is a narrative of occupation under an apartheid regime, involving land confiscation, house demolitions, military incursions, and nightly raids.
Crucially, the context of a nuclear-armed regional superpower that occupies, oppresses, and commits daily documented crimes against Palestinians is missing from the narrative."
Anchor: I want to ask you a specific question because you're using a lot of words which clearly many in your Arab world have used, words like apartheid and the rest, but you know that you are going to come under a lot of criticism from Israel and its supporters.
Queen Rania: But let me just emphasize that part is a designation given not by Arabs but by Israeli and international human rights organizations.
Anchor: Do you feel that you have a particular voice as Queen of Jordan in a country that has a peace treaty with Israel to speak up?
Queen Rania: I am not the focus here. It's about advocating for humanity, not taking sides between pro-Israeli or pro-Palestinian stances. The emphasis should be on the everyday people on both sides. The Palestinian people have long endured oppression and dehumanization, facing daily indignities and human rights violations, including imprisonment, humiliation, and harassment. They lack freedom of movement due to the presence of over 500 checkpoints in the West Bank. The International Court of Justice has deemed the separation wall, dividing territories into 200 disconnected enclaves, illegal. Additionally, aggressive settlement expansion on Palestinian land has disrupted territorial continuity, rendering the prospect of an autonomous, independent Palestinian State unviable. This context predates the recent focus on Hamas. The issue at hand is a fight for freedom and justice, a message that needs to be heard.
Anchor: A journalist on the Saudi television network Al Arabia took this and hammered Khaled Mashal the former head of Hamas and said to him what everybody's seeing on their screens has turned the world away from the Palestinian cause and people are saying what Hamas did has brought this down on these poor people of Gaza. Do you accept that?
Queen Rania: I do not condone the killing of civilians. However, the ongoing violence in this conflict must be condemned. It's crucial to understand that, under the pretext of self-defense, we are witnessing atrocities. While every country has the right to defend itself, this should not involve war crimes or collective punishment. The recent events have resulted in the deaths of 6,000 civilians, including 2,400 children. The use of precision weapons does not justify this mass-scale butchery.
Over the past two weeks, Gaza has been indiscriminately bombarded, leading to the destruction of entire families and residential neighborhoods. Hospitals, schools, churches, mosques, as well as medical workers, journalists, and UN aid workers, have been targeted. These actions raise questions about the definition of self-defense. There seems to be a double standard, where Israeli actions are often labeled as self-defense, whereas similar violence by Palestinians is immediately termed terrorism.
It's essential to recognize the power imbalance in this conflict. One party is an occupier with one of the world's mightiest militaries, while the other lacks a military altogether. This false symmetry is misleading. The focus on the right to defend itself doesn't capture the complete picture. It disregards the violations of international law and humanitarian law, the stories of suffering, and the enduring effects of occupation. Israel has violated over 30 UN security resolutions, mandating actions like withdrawal from territories occupied in 1967 and halting settlements and the separation wall, as well as addressing human rights violations. These violations lie at the heart of the issue; it's not merely a matter of hyperfixation on Hamas.
Anchor: Your husband King Abdullah I believe it was last weekend at the summit of Arab leaders in Cairo. he said the message the Arab world is hearing is loud and clear Palestinian lives matter less than Israeli ones. Our Lives matter less than other lives.
Queen Rania: It has been deeply disheartening to witness the double standards prevailing in the world today. There was strong condemnation of the events on October 7th, yet there has been notably less condemnation of the ongoing situation. The absence of an immediate call for a ceasefire amid the staggering human suffering is concerning. The narrative consistently seems to favor the Israeli perspective. Western media and policymakers tend to adopt Israeli narratives during attacks on the Palestinian side. However, when Israelis lose their lives, the language used portrays them as being 'murdered in cold blood' or the incident as a 'massacre.' Interestingly, similar terminology describing the current situation, despite its greater magnitude of atrocities, is notably absent.
I'm not questioning the accuracy of the information but rather highlighting the lack of equivalence and the existence of double standards. For instance, when the President of the United States was informed about evidence of children being beheaded, only to retract the statement because the IDF denied it, it illustrates confirmation bias. Even reputable networks like CNN have been caught up in this bias. For instance, the CNN website reported a headline about Israeli children found butchered in an Israeli kibbutz at the beginning of the conflict. However, upon reading the story, it became evident that the claim had not been independently verified. Would you publish such a damning, yet unverified, claim made by a Palestinian?
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
BS Yediyurappa appeals to MLA Yatnal's group to work unitedly to strengthen party
Bengaluru, Nov 26: With a group of Karnataka BJP leaders led by Bijapur MLA Basanagouda Patil Yatnal holding a parallel agitation over the waqf issue, veteran party leader B S Yediyurappa on Tuesday accused them of doing it because of their "self-conceit", and appealed them to work unitedly to strengthen the party.
The former Karnataka chief minister also said that everyone should take the responsibility for the party's defeat in the Assembly bypolls for three segments, even as the BJP's performance is being seen as a "setback" for his son and state president B Y Vijayendra.
"State president B Y Vijayendra has appealed to Basangouda Patil Yatnal and others to stop protesting separately, and work with us unitedly. Despite this, because of their self-conceit, they are doing such things. It is not right on their part," Yediyurappa said.
Speaking to reporters here, he said, "I appeal to them at least now to come forward and cooperate to strengthen the party together."
When told that they are not willing to work unitedly with the state's current leadership of the party and whether he will bring it to the notice of the high command, Yediyurappa said, "We will do our duty. The rest is left to them and central leadership...high command knows everything. Let's see what they will do."
Yatnal-led group include BJP MLAs Ramesh Jarkiholi, B P Harish, and former lawmakers Aravind Limbavali, Kumar Bangarappa and G M Siddeshwara and others.
The leaders, who had stayed away from the protest recently held by the party on the Waqf issue, on Monday held a parallel agitation over the issue in Bidar. Today, they are in Kalaburagi district.
Yatnal and Jarkiholi have been openly critical of Vijayendra, accusing him of indulging in "adjustment politics" with the ruling Congress, and trying to keep the party in his clutches along with his father Yediyurappa.
Noting that the party had faced a setback in the bypolls for Sandur, Shiggaon and Channapatna, Yediyurappa said, "We accept that. What shortcomings were being discussed in the party. It should be ensured that such things don't repeat."
To a question whether the bypoll loss is being seen as a setback to his son Vijayendra, he said, "It is not a question of Vijayendra or Yediyurappa. The loss in all the three seats is a setback for us (party). Everyone should take the responsibility and see to it that such things don't repeat."
