Whistleblower Julian Assange freed from UK prison after striking plea deal with US
London: WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has reached an agreement to plead guilty to revealing military secrets in a US court in exchange for his freedom, ending a protracted legal battle that has spanned over a decade. According to court documents released Monday night, Assange will plead guilty to a single count of conspiracy to obtain and disseminate national defense information.
Assange, who has been in custody in Britain, is scheduled to appear in a US court in the Northern Mariana Islands, a US territory in the Pacific, later this week. WikiLeaks confirmed early Tuesday morning that "Julian Assange is free" and had left the UK.
Under the plea agreement, Assange is expected to be sentenced to 62 months in prison. With credit for the five years he has already served in a high-security British prison, he could soon return to his native Australia.
Assange, now 52, was initially sought by Washington for publishing hundreds of thousands of secret US documents in 2010 as the head of WikiLeaks. His release of military secrets about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan garnered him both praise as a champion of free speech and criticism for endangering US national security and intelligence sources.
The legal battle began with Assange's 2019 indictment by a US federal grand jury on 18 counts related to the publication of national security documents. His case took a dramatic turn when the British government approved his extradition in June 2022, a decision Assange appealed.
After spending seven years in Ecuador's London embassy to avoid extradition to Sweden over now-dropped sexual assault accusations, Assange was arrested and has since been detained in London's Belmarsh prison.
The plea deal's announcement comes just two weeks before Assange was scheduled to appeal the UK ruling approving his extradition to the US. His appeal was set to address whether he would receive First Amendment protections as a foreigner on trial in America.
The plea deal's conclusion was anticipated amid increasing pressure on President Joe Biden to drop the case. In February, the Australian government formally requested an end to the legal proceedings against Assange, a plea Biden said he would consider.
This plea bargain marks the end of nearly 14 years of legal turmoil for Assange, who has been both a hero to free speech advocates and a controversial figure accused of jeopardizing US national security.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
HC quashes order staying proceedings against Anil Ambani to classify his bank accounts as fraud
Mumbai (PTI): In a setback to industrialist Anil Ambani, the Bombay High Court on Monday quashed a single bench interim order that stayed proceedings initiated against him and Reliance Communications Ltd to classify their bank accounts as fraud.
A division bench of Chief Justice Shree Chandrashekhar and Justice Gautam Ankhad allowed the appeals filed by three public sector banks and auditor firm BDO India LLP against the December 2025 interim order passed by a single bench of the HC.
The division bench, while quashing the single bench order, termed it "illegal and perverse".
ALSO READ: Shirtless protest at AI Summit: Delhi Police nabs Youth Congress worker in Gwalior, total arrests 5
Ambani's counsels sought the HC to stay its order so that they could approach the Supreme Court, but the request was declined.
The banks last month challenged a December 2025 single-bench order granting interim relief to Ambani and his company. The order had cited violations of mandatory RBI rules and a classic case of banks "waking up from deep slumber" after years.
The single bench order stayed all present and future action by Indian Overseas Bank, IDBI Bank and Bank of Baroda, noting that the action was based on a legally flawed forensic audit and violated the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) mandatory guidelines.
The three banks in their appeal said the forensic audit, which led to accounts being classified as "fraud", was legally valid and based on serious findings of fund siphoning and misutilisation.
This was recorded in the report submitted by the audit firm BDO LLP, they contended.
The banks, in their plea, also said Ambani had raised a technical challenge to the forensic audit before the single bench.
They sought the division bench to quash the single bench's interim order, claiming it was "perverse".
Ambani had challenged before the single bench show-cause notices issued by the Indian Overseas Bank, IDBI and Bank of Baroda, seeking to declare his and Reliance Communications' accounts as fraud accounts.
As an interim relief, he sought a stay of the notices and an injunction against any coercive action on the ground that BDO LLP was not qualified to conduct the forensic audit as its signatory was not a chartered accountant.
BDO LLP was an accounting consultant firm and not an audit firm, Ambani claimed.
The single bench had agreed with Ambani and stayed the action by the banks.
