Lucknow (PTI): Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Adityanath has trashed as "childish" Samajwadi Party president Akhilesh Yadav's charge that he delayed distribution of tablets and smartphones as he cannot operate gadgets himself, and asserted that the state government has been using e-path as part of good governance.

Yadav probably doesn't know that I have been monitoring the functioning of government schemes through an e-dashboard installed in my office as well as residence, the chief minister said.

The government had presented an e-budget last time as well as this time, he told PTI in an interview on board a helicopter in the course of campaigning.

He was responding to Yadav's remarks that "since 'baba mukhya mantri' doesn't know how to operate laptop and tablet he delayed there distribution as part of the the BJP'S 2017 poll promises in the state".

Dubbing it as a childish remark, Adiyanath said Yadav will remain a 'babua' (child) throughout his life and added that "such comments are devoid of sanskar and sanskriti" (value and culture).

Uttar Pradesh has been using Information Technology on a wider scale as part of good governance.The government has adopted e-tender procedure to end "malpractices" during previous governments when middlemen used to "swallow" larger chunks of the development projects money.

Online monitoring helped the government streamline the public distribution system as well as in effective monitoring of Covid cases, Adityanath said.

Due to widespread use of e-platform, the Uttar Pradesh PDS system is the most transparent in the country, he asserted.

The chief minister said the state government will continue to distribute one crore tablets among the youth as part of its 2017 poll promise.

The Samajwadi Party has lodged a complaint with the Election Commission on making available tablets when the model code of conduct was in operation in poll-bound Uttar Pradesh.

"Let him cry. We will distribute one crore tablets among youth and this figure will double up to two crore after March 10," he said.

Elections are being held in seven phases in Uttar Pradesh and the results will be declared on March 10.

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



New Delhi, Feb 20 (PTI): The Delhi High Court has refused to quash an FIR against AAP MP Swati Maliwal for allegedly disclosing the identity of a 14-year-old rape victim who succumbed to injuries.

Justice Neena Bansal Krishna said Maliwal's claim that she was protected from prosecution as her actions were in good faith would have to be proved at an appropriate stage and there was no ground for closing the proceedings in the present plea.

Delhi Police registered the FIR against Maliwal in 2016 when she was the chairperson of Delhi Commission for Women, and said there was a blatant violation of provisions of Juvenile Justice Act, which protect the identity of a minor victim of sexual offence.

"Prima facie, offence under Section 74 read with Section 86 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 is clearly disclosed. Insofar as the petitioner's claim that she has protection under Section 100 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 for her actions done in good faith is concerned, it is her defence which is required to be proved in accordance with law at the appropriate stage," the court said on February 13.

The judge added, "Therefore, there is no ground for quashing of the FIR and the proceedings..."

Maliwal sought a court-monitored probe in the matter, saying despite the minor's death, the police did not invoke the murder charge in the FIR.

The court said the prayer was infructuous as a chargesheet was filed in the two cases in relation to the incident and the cases were pending trial.

It is now for the trial court to consider them and no fruitful purpose would be served by referring further investigation to an SIT, the court said.

The minor girl succumbed to her injuries on July 23, 2016 in a hospital after being sexually assaulted by her neighbour who allegedly forced a corrosive substance down her throat and damaged her internal organs.

The police said Maliwal circulated a notice she had sent to the area deputy commissioner of police, in which she sought to know about the investigation in the rape case.

The notice, which was given to the print and electronic media, reportedly named victim.

The FIR alleged that the notice was "intentionally circulated" on various WhatsApp groups and shown by TV channels.

On account of the presence of the consent of the victim's parents to disclose her name, Section 228A (Prohibition on disclosure of identity of the victim) of the IPC was dropped and Section 74 of the Juvenile Justice Act was added in the case.