Ambedkar offers support to Cong on 7 LS seats; slams Sena (UBT), NCP (SP) over attitude towards VBA
Akola, Mar 19: Vanchit Bahujan Aghadi (VBA) chief Prakash Ambedkar on Tuesday expressed his displeasure with Shiv Sena (UBT) and NCP (Sharadchandra Pawar) for their "unequal attitude" towards his party, and offered support to the third Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) partner - Congress - on seven Lok Sabha seats in Maharashtra.
The VBA's proposal to the Congress is not only a "goodwill" gesture, but also an "extension of a friendly hand" for a possible alliance for the future, he said.
Ambedkar wrote a letter to Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge on Tuesday, in which he mentioned these points. He also held a press conference in Maharashtra's Akola to explain the issue further.
Ambedkar, the grandson of Dr B R Ambedkar, has earlier announced his candidature for the Lok Sabha from Akola seat as a VBA nominee.
Ambedkar-led VBA has been eyeing to join hands with the three MVA allies - Congress, Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena and Sharad Pawar-helmed NCP (SP) for the upcoming Lok Sabha polls. However, the seat-sharing talks with the allies have remained inconclusive so far.
In his letter to Kharge, Ambedkar said, "The schedule of elections has been announced and the MVA has been meeting continuously without inviting the VBA for any discussions or meetings. Shiv Sena (UBT) and NCP (Sharadchandra Pawar) have refused to listen to the VBA's representatives in the numerous MVA meetings and we have lost faith in both of these parties due to their unequal attitude towards the VBA in the MVA."
"The VBA's prime agenda remains the same - unseat the fascist, divisive, undemocratic BJP-RSS government. With this thought, I have decided to lend VBA's full support to the Congress on seven seats in Maharashtra. We request you to enlist me the names of seven constituencies from the quota allotted to the Congress in the MVA. Our party will lend its complete ground and strategic support to the candidates of your party on these seven seats of your choice," he said.
The proposal from the VBA to the Congress is not only in goodwill, but also an extension of a friendly hand for a possible alliance for the future, Ambedkar said.
Talking to reporters over the issue, he said, "The VBA has not yet received any proposal from the MVA, and we have not accepted the proposal of three seats sent to us previously by the MVA."
At present, there is a tug-of-war between the Congress and the Shiv Sena (UBT) over 10 seats. None of the three allies - Congress, Shiv Sena (UBT) and the NCP (SP) is ready to let go five important seats, Ambedkar claimed.
"The VBA will cooperate with the Congress in seven Lok Sabha constituencies as there is no unity in the MVA itself," he said.
"The Congress had previously fielded a Muslim candidate against me twice in the Akola Lok Sabha seat. This time, if the Congress fields a Muslim candidate against me in Akola, then that party's support will be lost all over the country," he said.
When asked if the VBA will contest all 48 Lok Sabha seats in Maharashtra, he said he would wait for the decision by the MVA.
Ambedkar-led VBA had joined hands with the Shiv Sena (UBT) in January 2023.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Court can reject anticipatory bail but cannot direct accused to surrender: SC
New Delhi (PTI): A court can reject anticipatory bail of an accused but it has no jurisdiction to direct him to surrender before the trial court, the Supreme Court has said.
A bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and Ujjal Bhuyan made the observation while hearing a plea filed by a man accused of cheating and forgery.
"If the court wants to reject the anticipatory bail, it may do so, but the court has no jurisdiction to say that the petitioner should now surrender," the bench said.
The Jharkhand High Court had rejected anticipatory bail plea of the accused and asked him to surrender and seek regular bail.
In this case, a complaint had been filed before a magistrate alleging offences under Sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 420 (cheating), 467 (forgery of valuable security), 468 (forgery for purpose of cheating), 471 (using forged document) and 120B read with 34 of the IPC, in connection with a land dispute.
The high court had dismissed the second anticipatory bail application of the accused on the ground that no new circumstances were shown.
It had relied on its earlier order rejecting his first anticipatory bail plea, in which the court directed the petitioner to surrender before the trial court and seek regular bail in terms of the decision in Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI.
The top court said such a direction was wholly without jurisdiction and said that if a court chooses to reject anticipatory bail, it may do so, but it cannot compel the accused to surrender.
