Andhra HC upholds lesbian couple’s right to live together, parents told not to 'interfere'
Amaravati (PTI): The Andhra Pradesh High Court has upheld the right of a lesbian couple to live together, affirming their freedom to choose partners.
A bench comprising Justices R Raghunandan Rao and K Maheswara Rao was hearing a habeas corpus petition filed by Kavitha (name changed), one of the women, alleging that her partner Lalitha (name changed) was detained by her father against her will and kept her at his residence in Narsipatnam.
The Court on Tuesday further directed the parents of Lalitha not to interfere with the relationship of the couple, asserting that their daughter is a major and can make her own decisions.
The couple has been "living together" for the past one year in Vijayawada.
Based on a missing complaint by Kavitha earlier, police traced Laitha at her father’s home, and rescued her. After that, she was kept at a welfare home for 15 days though she pleaded to the police that she is a major and wants to live with her partner.
Lalitha also lodged a complaint against her father in September alleging that her parents are harassing her over the relationship and other issues.
After the police intervention, Lalitha came back to Vijayawada and started going to work, often meeting her partner.
However, Lalitha’s father once again came to her place and took the daughter away forcibly in a vehicle. He kept her in his custody "unlawfully", Kavitha alleged in her habeas corpus petition.
The father also lodged a complaint with police alleging that his daughter was abducted by Kavitha and her family members.
Jada Sravan Kumar, counsel for Kavitha, pointing out earlier Supreme Court judgments, argued that the detenue has expressed her unequivocal consent to cohabit with the petitioner in a shared household of petitioner's parents and would never want to get back to her parents and other family members.
Kumar also informed the court that Lalitha had also expressed her desire to withdraw the complaint she lodged against her parents if she'd be allowed to live with the petitioner.
The Vijayawada police on Tuesday produced Lalitha before the High Court following the court’s direction.
The Bench while disposing of the petition, also made an observation that no criminal proceedings be initiated against the family members of Lalitha as she was willing to withdraw the complaint.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
SEBI bans YouTuber Ravindra Balu Bharti for investment scam, fines ₹9.5 crore
New Delhi: The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has barred YouTuber Ravindra Balu Bharti and his company, Ravindra Bharti Education Institute, from accessing the securities market until April 4, 2025. The action follows allegations of running an unregistered investment advisory business.
SEBI has also directed Bharti and his firm to refund ₹9.5 crore earned through unauthorised activities. Bharti, who has over 19 lakh subscribers across two YouTube channels, reportedly lured inexperienced investors with trade recommendations, investment advice, and execution services.
According to SEBI, Bharti’s company promoted "high returns" without disclosing associated risks and operated without mandatory registration. The regulator highlighted manipulative tactics, including selling multiple investment plans to individual investors, limiting their autonomy in decision-making.
In addition to the repayment order, SEBI has imposed a ban on Bharti, his company, and associates from engaging in any securities market activity until April 2025. They are also prohibited from offering investment advisory services without proper registration. A further penalty of ₹10 lakh has been levied on Bharti and his associates.
