AR Rahman gets notice from Madras High Court for evading income tax on Rs 3.47 crore
Chennai: The Madras High Court on Friday issued notice to music composer A R Rahman on a petition filed by the Income Tax department alleging that he used a foundation in which he is the managing trustee as a conduit to evade tax and routed Rs three crore plus income to it.
The Income Tax Department moved the High Court challenging the ruling of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal here that set aside the order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax in Chennai.
A division bench of justices TS Sivagnanam and V Bhavani Subbaroyan recorded the submissions made by the IT department and issued notice to the music composer.
According to senior standing counsel for the Income Tax department T R Senthil Kumar, in the assessment year 2011- 12, Rahman received income to the tune of Rs 3.47 crore in connection with an agreement made with the UK-based Libra Mobiles.
The contract was to compose exclusive ringtones for the company and the term of the contract was for three years.
As per the contract, Rahman instructed the company to pay his remuneration directly to the foundation managed by him, the department said.
"The taxable income must be received by Rahman and after due deduction of tax, it can be transferred to the trust. But the same cannot be routed through the trust as income to the charitable trust is exempted under the Income Tax Act," the counsel said.
According to the petition filed by the Income Tax department, Rahman after receiving the IT notice had moved the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in Chennai and the tribunal in September 2019 had held that the government of India had accorded "post facto approval" with respect to this contribution.
The tribunal ruled in favour of Rahman finding that the amount was not taxable.
The petition said the order of the appellate tribunal is "erroneous in law" and opposed to facts and circumstances of the case.
Rahman had received Rs 3,47,77,200 from Libra Mobile during 2010-11 in his individiual capacity as an artiste which must have been considered for taxation and this was not considered by the Assessing Officer in the reassessment order.
The receipts by the trust are professional fees paid to the assessee for the services rendered by him.
However, the assessee has not admitted these professional receipts in his return of income for the assessment year 2011-12.
Instead of receiving the consideration as professional charges in his individual capacity, the assessee has got these payments diverted to A R Rahman Foundation which is registered as a tax-exempt entity under the Income Tax Act.
The amount that must have been received by Rahman as professional fee has been passed off as "donation" to the foundation.
The tribunal failed to consider that the assessee who is also the managing trustee of A R Rahman Foundation has used it as a "conduit" for accounting his own untaxed income, the plea said.
The Assessing Officer had not made any attempt to examine the various clauses of agreement nor tried to make enquiry to ascertain facts.
Also, the AO did not gather any material during the course of reassessment proceedings to come to the very same conclusion arrived at during the original assessment.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
CEO’s Rs 14 lakh Louis Vuitton dog suitcase triggers social media debate
New Delhi: An Indian CEO has triggered widespread debate on social media after reportedly spending Rs 14 lakh on a Louis Vuitton suitcase designed for his dog. Ajay Thakore, CEO of Doctor Multimedia, shared a video on Instagram showcasing the extravagant purchase, which has since drawn mixed reactions.
In the video, Thakore is seen entering a Louis Vuitton store, stating, "I think my dog has something to pick up." He then reveals the "Bone Trunk," a bone-shaped, hard-shell suitcase complete with a varnished wooden tray and two bowls. The video’s caption read, "Aspen's always spending money like there's no tomorrow. $20k Louis Vuitton bone trunk."
The post quickly went viral, with many users expressing shock and disbelief. Some criticized the CEO’s indulgence, questioning the morality of spending such a large sum on a pet accessory when pressing issues like poverty and animal welfare exist. Comments ranged from disbelief to sharp criticism, with one user remarking, "Imagine how far $20k would go at an animal rescue." Others viewed it as a reflection of societal excess, calling it a "grotesque illustration of what's wrong in society."
However, Thakore also found support from some users, who defended his right to spend his wealth as he pleased. One commenter noted the irony of criticism coming from people who indulge in expensive gadgets, writing, "It's funny how many condemn this spending yet think nothing of buying an $800 iPhone without considering charity."
