Big blow to NDA ahead of Bihar elections: RLJP quits alliance over 'injustice'
New Delhi: In a significant political development ahead of the upcoming Bihar assembly elections, the Rashtriya Lok Janshakti Party (RLJP), a key Dalit outfit, has announced its decision to exit the National Democratic Alliance (NDA).
The move comes as a blow to the ruling coalition, which is now facing internal rifts just months before the crucial polls.
RLJP chief and Union Minister Pashupati Kumar Paras declared the party's departure from the NDA, citing discrimination and neglect.
"We were with the NDA from 2014 till now and remained loyal allies. But during the recent Lok Sabha elections, the NDA did injustice to our party, which represents the Dalit community," Paras said during a press briefing.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Guj HC schools cops, asks under which law they stop people from videography inside police station
Ahmedabad: A video of Justice Nirzar S Desai of the Gujarat High Court sharply questioning the state government over the legality of prohibiting videography inside police stations has gone viral on social media, reigniting the debate on citizens' rights and police accountability.
In a pointed exchange during court proceedings, Justice Desai asked the state’s lawyer:
"Tell me under which section videography is prohibited. Today we are living in an era of transparency. Assuming police are doing something illegal and a citizen intends to videograph it – which provision of law empowers you to stop someone from taking videography? Under which provision of law have you stopped the accused from video recording?"
The video has sparked widespread public interest, especially in the context of earlier legal interpretations around filming inside police premises.
View this post on Instagram
Background: Courts on videography in police stations
The question of whether video recording inside a police station is a punishable offence has previously been addressed by the Bombay High Court. In Ravindra Shitalrao Upadyay v. State of Maharashtra (2022 SCC OnLine Bom 2015), the Aurangabad bench ruled that such recording does not fall under Section 3 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923, which deals with spying. The court noted that police stations are not categorized as "prohibited places" under Section 2(8) of the Act. Therefore, secretly recording inside a police station cannot be treated as an offence under the Official Secrets Act.
