BJP allegedly offering Rs 5 crore to field candidate against Hemant Soren, claims JMM
Ranchi: Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM) leader Manoj Pandey has claimed that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is offering Rs 5 crore to entice a candidate within its ranks to contest against Chief Minister Hemant Soren in the upcoming Jharkhand Assembly elections.
According to Pandey, BJP has been unsuccessful in finding a suitable candidate to oppose Soren in the Barhait Assembly constituency, leading to the financial incentive.
"They are struggling to find a candidate and have resorted to offering Rs 5 crore," Pandey told ANI. "BJP knows they won't secure more than 100-150 votes, which is why no one wants to contest against CM Soren."
Pandey suggested that the BJP’s inability to attract support in the constituency may lead to them forgoing a candidate altogether, or fielding someone motivated solely by the monetary offer. He added, "If their candidate gets only 250 votes, it would be a huge embarrassment."
Soren, who filed his nomination for the Barhait seat last Thursday, is considered a strong candidate, as Barhait falls under Santhal Paragana, a JMM stronghold. In the 2019 assembly elections, Soren won both Barhait and Dumka constituencies but vacated the Dumka seat afterward.
The Jharkhand Assembly elections will take place in two phases on 13 and 20 November, with results expected on 20 November.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Sujit Nair raises concerns over speculation of DMK-AIADMK understanding to block TVK
Chennai: Journalist and political commentator Sujit Nair has expressed concern over speculation that the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam and the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam could explore a post-poll understanding to prevent Vijay-led Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam from forming the government in Tamil Nadu.
In a social media post, Sujit Nair said the election verdict in Tamil Nadu reflected a clear public demand for political change and argued that the mandate should be respected irrespective of political preferences.
Referring to reports and political discussions surrounding a possible understanding between the DMK and AIADMK, he said he hoped such developments remained only speculative conversations and did not turn into reality.
Nair stated that if such an alliance were to take shape, it would raise serious questions about ideological politics in the country. He said TVK had emerged through a democratic electoral process and that the legitimacy to govern in a parliamentary democracy comes from the people’s verdict.
According to him, attempts to prevent an electoral winner from forming the government through unexpected political arrangements may be constitutionally valid, but many people could view them as politically opportunistic.
He further said that such a move could particularly affect the political image of the DMK, which has historically projected itself around ideology, social justice and opposition politics. Nair said that in ideological terms, the DMK appeared closer to TVK than to the AIADMK, and joining hands with its long-time political rival only to remain in power could weaken its broader political narrative.
He added that the same questions would apply to the AIADMK as well, as the party had spent decades positioning itself against the DMK and such an arrangement could create discomfort among its cadre and supporters.
Drawing a comparison with Maharashtra politics in 2019, Nair said he had expressed similar views when the Shiv Sena formed an alliance with the Indian National Congress and the Nationalist Congress Party after the Assembly elections.
He said post-poll alliances between long-standing political rivals often create a public perception that ideology and electoral mandates become secondary when political power equations come into play.
Nair also said such developments increase public cynicism towards politics and reinforce the belief among voters that ideology is often sidelined after elections.
He maintained that the Tamil Nadu verdict was emphatic and said respecting both the spirit and substance of the mandate was important for the credibility of democratic politics.
