New Delhi: Celebi Aviation India has vehemently rejected rumors on social media about ownership or affiliation with Sumeyye Erdogan, the daughter of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Celebi Aviation India takes care of the ground and cargo handling activities at key Indian airports like Delhi, Mumbai, and Chennai, which are sensitive from a national security viewpoint.
The clarification follows the Indian government's move to cancel the company's security clearance in the wake of increased scrutiny of Turkish connections, after Ankara's latest diplomatic approach inclining towards Pakistan.
In a formal announcement, the ground-handling and airport services firm declared that Sumeyye Erdogan has no involvement whatsoever and doesn't have any stake in the parent organization. The company clarified that its ownership lies solely with members of the Celebioglu family, Can Celebioglu and Canan Celebioglu, who, it said, have no political associations.
"There is no one named Sumeyye owning any shareholding in the parent organisation,” the statement noted, dismissing online speculation as baseless. Celebi further stated that it is a professionally managed company with a global presence, adhering to corporate governance and neutrality, and having no ties to any foreign government or political individual.
Celebi also detailed the ownership structure of its parent company, explaining that 65 per cent is held by institutional investors across Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, Singapore, the UAE, and Western Europe. Notably, a Jersey-registered fund, Actera Partners II L.P., holds a 50 per cent stake, while Dutch entity Alpha Airport Services BV owns 15 per cent.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Belagavi (Karnataka) (PTI): Members of the Opposition BJP on Tuesday slammed the Karnataka government for not taking measures to prevent the alleged noise pollution caused by 'azaan', the Islamic call to prayer.
BJP MLC D S Arun raised the issue in the Legislative Council during the question hour, accusing the ruling Congress of "appeasement" by failing to take action against mosques that are violating the Supreme Court's directives.
Karnataka Minister for Forest, Ecology and Environment Eshwar Khandre, responding to the question, said, as per the directives of the Supreme Court in sensitive zones, the noise level should not exceed 50 decibels during the day and 40 decibels at night, and in residential areas, 55 decibels during the day and 45 decibels at night.
In commercial areas, the noise should not exceed 65 decibels during the day, 55 at night, and in industrial areas, 75 during the day and at night 70 decibels, he said.
Pointing out that the Karnataka government had issued an order in 2022, assigning responsibility to a committee headed by a DySPs or ACPs for the effective implementation of the rules, the minister said when a complaint is received about noise pollution, the Pollution Control Board will inspect it and provide information about the decibel level to the police to take further action, including filing of criminal cases.
ALSO READ: Udupi: Toddler slips from mother's hand while drawing water from well, dies
"Not only during azaan, but also during bhajans held in temples and marriage events, among others, the violations happen. There is a need to spread awareness. The Supreme Court has ordered against bursting firecrackers, but it is being violated. Efforts will be made to implement the rules effectively," he said.
Several BJP MLAs, including Arun, Bharathi Shetty, among others, were not satisfied with the minister's reply. They took strong exception to it.
Arun noted that in the last three years, only 52 cases have been taken, and said there are clear violations by almost all mosques, but no action has been taken. "The decibels have in fact increased under this government. The government is giving protection to them."
Reacting to this, Khandre, calling it a "sensitive matter", said, "It is not right to politicise the issue. The law of this land is equal for everyone."
Hitting back, Arun asked, "Why is the matter sensitive? What is preventing you (the government) from implementing the Supreme Court directives?"
