China building new bridge near Pangong Tso: Satellite imagery
New Delhi(PTI): China is constructing a second bridge in an area held by it around the strategically key Pangong Tso lake in eastern Ladakh and it could help the Chinese military to quickly mobilise its troops in the region, according to satellite imagery and people familiar with the development on Wednesday.
The bridge is being built amid the lingering standoff between the Indian and Chinese militaries at several friction points in eastern Ladakh for over two years.
There is no official reaction or comment by the Indian defence establishment on the new construction.
China has been focusing on strengthening its military infrastructure after Indian troops captured several strategic peaks on the southern bank of the Pangong lake in August 2020 after the Chinese PLA attempted to intimidate them in the area.
India too has been constructing bridges, roads and tunnels in the border regions as part of overall efforts to enhance military preparedness.
It is learnt that China has recently completed the construction of the first bridge in the area. The people cited above said the new bridge is being built in an area that is over 20 km from the Line of Actual Control (LAC).
Damien Symon, a geospatial intelligence researcher, who keeps track of Chinese activities along the LAC, posted satellite images of the new construction on Twitter.
Symon, who uses the handle @detresfa_ said a "larger bridge" is being developed parallel to the first one, adding the likely aim of the construction is to "support larger/heavier movement" (of the military) over the lake.
The satellite image posted by Symon noted that the bridge is being built from both sides simultaneously. The bridge is likely to cut the distance significantly from the depth area of Rudok to the region around the LAC in Pangong Tso.
The eastern Ladakh faceoff began on May 4-5 in 2020. India has been insisting on the restoration of the status quo ante prior to the standoff.
India and China have held 15 rounds of military talks so far to resolve the eastern Ladakh row. As a result of the talks, the two sides completed the disengagement process last year on the north and south banks of the Pangong lake and in the Gogra area.
India has been consistently maintaining that peace and tranquillity along the LAC were key for the overall development of the bilateral ties.
Each side currently has around 50,000 to 60,000 troops along the Line of Actual Control in the sensitive sector.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Defamation case against VK Saxena: Court junks Medha Patkar's plea for new witness
New Delhi, Mar 18 (PTI): A Delhi court on Tuesday dismissed a plea of activist Medha Patkar to examine a new witness in her 2000 defamation case against Delhi Lieutenant Governor V K Saxena and said the judicial process couldn't be "held hostage to such tactics".
The Narmada Bachao Andolan leader filed the case against Saxena when he headed an NGO in Gujarat for allegedly publishing a defamatory advertisement.
Judicial magistrate Raghav Sharma noted that present case was pending for 24 years, and the complainant had already examined all the witnesses listed initially at the time of filing of the complaint.
"The judicial process cannot be held hostage to such tactics, especially in a case that has already been pending for over two decades," the judge said.
Patkar, he observed, previously filed a plea to summon additional witnesses, yet she did not mention the present witness in that application.
"If this witness was truly material to her case, she would have either included them in the original list of witnesses or, at the very least, mentioned them in the earlier application for additional witness. The fact that this witness has surfaced only now, after all of the complainant's witnesses have been examined, raises serious doubts about the genuineness of this request," the judge said.
The court said neither the complainant nor any of her witnesses referred to the witness sought to be summoned at any stage of the trial.
"If this witness was genuinely relevant, his/her name or role in the case would have been mentioned at some point during the last 24 years of proceedings. The complete absence of any reference to this witness further suggests that it is an afterthought, possibly introduced to bolster the complainant's case artificially," the judge said.
Patkar, said the court, further did not provide any explanation as to when, how, or under what circumstances she learnt about the witness.
If she was aware of the witness from the outset, she offered no justification for the prolonged delay in summoning them, the judge said.
"This lack of explanation further weakens the credibility of her request," the court added.
He said that allowing such applications without proper justification would set a dangerous precedent.
The order said if parties were permitted to introduce new witnesses arbitrarily at a belated stage, trials would become never-ending.
Patkar moved the application on February 17 seeking to examine an additional witness, Nandita Narain, saying she was "relevant to the facts in the present matter".
Saxena's counsel Gajinder Kumar opposed the plea, saying it was filed after a gap of 24 years to delay the judicial proceedings and defeating the ends of justice.
Patkar and Saxena have been locked in a legal tussle since 2000 after she filed the present suit against him for publishing advertisements against her and the Narmada Bachao Andolan.
Saxena, who then headed an Ahmedabad-based NGO Council for Civil Liberties, also filed two cases against Patkar in 2001 for allegedly making derogatory remarks against him on a TV channel and for issuing a defamatory press statement.
In one of the cases filed by Saxena, a Delhi court on July 1 last year sentenced Patkar to five months' simple imprisonment.
