New Delhi(PTI): The Supreme Court on Friday said the courts could not direct the legislature to enact a law in a particular manner.
A bench of Justices B R Gavai and Augustine George Masih made the observation while hearing a plea against a February 2024 order of the Delhi High Court which disposed of a PIL on the issue.
"The Parliament, after considering every aspect, has come out with a new enactment. In a writ jurisdiction, neither the high courts nor the Supreme Court can direct the legislature to enact a law in a particular manner," the bench said, while refusing to hear the plea.
The PIL sought directions to district courts or police to supply a copy of chargesheet to the complainant or victim free of cost.
The counsel appearing for the Centre referred to Section 230 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, saying the petition was infructuous.
The Centre's counsel said Section 230 prescribes, in any case where a proceeding was instituted on a police report, the magistrate should furnish to the accused and victim, free of cost a copy of documents, including the police report and the first information report.
The petitioner's counsel said Section 230 of the BNSS did not deal with the issue of the right of a complainant or victim to be heard and participate in pre-trial criminal proceedings.
The PIL also sought directions to all the district courts to issue notice to the complainants or victims at the time of taking of cognisance to enable them to exercise their right to be heard and participate in pre-trial criminal proceedings.
While referring to an apex court verdict and the Code of Criminal Procedure amendments, the high court said there were sufficient rights given to the victim or complainant to effectively participate in pre-trial and trial proceedings if they so elected.
It had also referred to the Delhi High Court rules and said it was clear that a party to a criminal case was entitled to obtain copies of the record of the case upon filing of an application.
The union home ministry has already issued direction to all states and union territories in October 2020 for the implementation of a standard operating procedure (SOP) over sexual offences against women and children, it added.
"In the said SOP at paragraph 23 with respect to the submission of chargesheet, police has been directed to provide a copy of chargesheet to the victim/informant without any cost," said the high court.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Mangaluru: Karnataka Legislative Assembly Speaker U.T. Khader Fareed has written to the Chief Justice of the High Court of Karnataka, Vibhu Bakhru, seeking the establishment of a Circuit Bench of the High Court in Mangaluru to serve the coastal and Malnad regions.
In his letter dated April 20, 2026, the Speaker highlighted the long-pending demand for a circuit bench in Dakshina Kannada district. He pointed out that districts including Dakshina Kannada, Udupi, Chikkamagaluru, Shivamogga, and Kodagu together account for a significant population and a large number of pending cases currently being handled by the High Court in Bengaluru.
He noted that litigants from these regions are forced to travel long distances to Bengaluru, which leads to financial burden and hardship, especially for economically weaker sections.
The Speaker stated that Mangaluru, being a major city with well-developed infrastructure, strong connectivity, and established facilities in sectors such as healthcare, banking, and industry, is a suitable location for setting up a circuit bench. He also pointed out that when the High Court was established during the Mysore State era, the population was much lower. At present, the population of Dakshina Kannada and Udupi districts alone exceeds 40 lakh, strengthening the case for decentralisation of judicial services.
According to the letter, setting up a circuit bench in the region would improve access to justice, help reduce case pendency, and serve the larger public interest.
Khader also mentioned that the Mangaluru Bar Association has been actively pursuing the matter and has sought an opportunity to discuss it with the Chief Justice. He expressed his full support for the demand and urged the Chief Justice to take appropriate steps in this regard.
