Ex-Gurugram police commissioner files defamation suit against judge, seeks Rs 1 cr in damages
Gurugram (PTI): Former Gurugram police commissioner Krishan Kumar Rao has filed a defamation suit against a judge for "adverse remarks" made against him in a judicial order and sought Rs 1 crore in damages.
The suit was filed in the court of Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) Vikramjit Singh on Monday and the hearing was held on the same day. The court decided to take up the matter again on November 21.
"Suit seeking compensation and damages from and against the defendant and also to restrain the defendants from maligning and defaming the plaintiff in any manner has been received. It be checked and registered. Now, matter stands adjourned for 21.11.2024 for consideration on the point of maintainability of the suit," read the order.
According to the senior IPS officer, Additional District and Sessions Judge Amit Sahrawat in an order passed in February 2022 had rejected former deputy commissioner of Gurugram police Dheeraj Setia's bail application in connection with a multi-crore heist, saying there was more to the story than meets the eye.
The judge said that based on the admission made by Sachinder Jain Naval, a doctor who is the chief suspect in the case, it seemed suspicious that Setia, who was accused of accepting a bribe to derail investigations in the case, could do so right under Rao, especially given that gangsters would visit him at the Gurugram Commissionerate.
The court had also said that investigators could not determine if the entire exercise was done with the former police commissioner's consent without the suspect's custody, read the order.
In the defamation suit, the senior officer argued that the judge's remarks were based on conjecture and had no judicial basis. He stated that the comments regarding his supposed lack of knowledge about the events were personal in nature and unrelated to the adjudication of the bail application.
The petition also claimed that the comments were not protected under the Judges Protection Act since they did not pertain to the judge's official duties.
The incident dates back to August 4, 2021, when gangster Lagarpuriya's men broke into a flat of a private company used as office space and decamped with crores of rupees in cash. A Special Task Force investigating the case put this money at Rs 30-40 crore.
Naval had claimed that he bribed Setia with gold, cash, and currency in US dollars worth Rs 2.5 crore to hush up the case. However, he said Setia returned a large part of the money and gold but kept a few dollars, saying the case was not in his hands.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Another video of Karnataka HC judge making gender-insensitive comment surfaces
In previous video, Judge was seen referring Muslim dominated area in Bengaluru as Pakistan
Bengaluru: Hours after a video of Karnataka High Court judge Justice Vedavyasachar Srishananda referring to a Muslim-majority area in West Bengaluru as "Pakistan" went viral, another video has surfaced showing the judge making a gender-insensitive remark.
In this newly surfaced video, Justice Srishananda is seen reprimanding a woman lawyer for answering a question directed at the counsel for the opposite party. The judge, in a light-hearted manner, commented that the woman seemed to know so much about the opposite party that she might even reveal the colour of his undergarments next.
The video captures the judge first questioning a male lawyer, asking, "You can’t write on a cheque just because it is empty. He will go to jail for 3 years. Do you understand that?" The male advocate responded in the affirmative, following which the judge inquired if the person in question was an income tax assessee.
Before the male lawyer could answer, the opposing counsel, a woman lawyer, replied that the individual was indeed an income tax assessee. The judge then asked her why she was responding, saying, "Wait, amma," prompting the lawyer to apologise. Justice Srishananda then added, "You know everything about him. If asked tomorrow, you will tell what colour of undergarment he wears," smiling as he made the comment, which also drew smiles from the other counsel present.
This second video has stirred further outrage on social media, with many demanding action against the judge for his inappropriate comment.
Senior Advocate Indira Jaising shared the video on her X account, calling for the Chief Justice of India to take suo motu action. "We call upon the Chief Justice of India to take suo motu action against this judge and send him for gender sensitisation training," Jaising posted.
