Foil govt 'agenda' to create language divide: Raj Thackeray to schools after order on Hindi
_vb_26.jpeg)
Mumbai (PTI): MNS chief Raj Thackeray on Wednesday asked what was the need to "impose" Hindi on students and appealed to schools in Maharashtra to foil the government's "hidden agenda to deliberately create a language divide".
Hindi is the state language of some northern states and it is wrong to force it on Maharashtra, where Marathi is widely used, he asserted.
The state government on Tuesday issued an order saying Hindi will "generally" be taught as the third language to students in Marathi and English medium schools in the state from classes 1 to 5.
If the government pressures the schools, the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) will stand by them like a "rock", Thackeray said at a press conference here, and demanded that the previous two-language formula of English and Marathi be continued.
"The government will be responsible for the consequences. If it thinks this is a challenge from us, so be it," said Thackeray, whose party has been stressing the use of Marathi language in banks and other commercial establishments.
The amended government resolution (GR) said Hindi will "generally" be the third language, instead of being mandatory, and gave an option to opt out if 20 students per grade in a school express the desire to study any Indian language other than Hindi.
Some pro-Marathi outfits accused the government of reintroducing the policy through the "backdoor" after initially backtracking, and the opposition Congress accused the Devendra Fadnavis-led government of "stabbing" the Marathi people in the chest.
"Why is there a need for an alternative to Hindi? Hindi was always an optional language from higher grades in school. Those who wish to learn the language always did so. Why impose it on small children?" Thackeray asked.
He said the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 doesn't say Hindi should be a mandatory language in schools, but leaves the decision on state governments on the basis of what local people want.
"I don't understand the politics behind this," the MNS leader said, wondering whether the IAS lobby of Maharashtra was behind the move so that they don't need to know Marathi.
Thackeray said he had doubts that the government may make a "U-turn" as it did not issue a GR earlier after taking a decision that Hindi will not be mandatory.
"The printing of Hindi text books was on," he said.
Thackeray said apart from the school managements and principals, he will also be writing to the government to withdraw its fresh order.
The previous two-language formula of English and Marathi should continue, he asserted.
"I appeal to schools, parents and all citizens to foil the government's hidden agenda to deliberately create a language divide for selfish political interests," Thackeray said.
Marathi will cease to exist in near future, he claimed, adding that people of the state, irrespective of whether they are Marathi-speaking or not, should oppose the government's decision.
In Gujarat, there is no three-language formula and Hindi is not compulsory in schools, Thackeray said.
Hindi is the state language of some northern states and it is wrong to force it on Maharashtra, he added.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
If you have a conscience, apologize to the people: R Ashoka slams Yathindra over Nalwadi comparison
Bengaluru: Leader of the Opposition R. Ashoka launched a scathing attack on MLC Dr. Yathindra, demanding that he retract his controversial statement comparing Chief Minister Siddaramaiah to the late Maharaja Nalwadi Krishnaraja Wadiyar. Ashoka urged Yathindra to apologize to the people of Karnataka if he had even a shred of conscience and any respect for the Mysuru royal lineage.
In a strongly worded social media post on Sunday, Ashoka stated, “Comparing Siddaramaiah to Nalwadi Krishnaraja Wadiyar is nothing short of absurd. Where is Nalwadi, who was bestowed the title of ‘Rajarshi’ by Mahatma Gandhi himself, and where is Siddaramaiah, who has stooped to being a puppet in the hands of fake Gandhis for the sake of power?”
He continued his critique by contrasting the enduring legacy of Nalwadi, remembered fondly by Kannadigas for his people-centric development, with what he termed as Siddaramaiah’s failure to manage Karnataka’s economy, burdening every household with debt.
Ashoka highlighted several stark differences, while Nalwadi built Mysore University over a century ago, Siddaramaiah is shutting down nine universities due to lack of funds. Nalwadi famously sold his family’s gold to build the KRS dam, whereas Siddaramaiah is accused of grabbing 14 sites meant for the public. Nalwadi established Bhadravati Iron & Steel Plant, Sandalwood Soap Factory, and Mysore Paper Mills. In contrast, Ashoka claimed Siddaramaiah's governance drove away industries, investors, and entrepreneurs. Nalwadi pioneered reservations for the backward classes long before it became mainstream. Siddaramaiah, Ashoka alleged, is reducing social justice to a gimmick by sticking labels on doors in the name of surveys.
While acknowledging Yathindra’s emotional attachment to his father, Ashoka emphasized that comparing Siddaramaiah to a visionary like Nalwadi was “laughable, baseless, and a gross insult” to the late king.
In his concluding remarks, Ashoka slammed the government for ignoring farmers’ needs despite an early monsoon. He accused the administration of being caught up in internal power struggles and negligence, forcing farmers into despair. “This government will not be spared from the curse of the farmers,” he warned.
