New Delhi: A former AAP councilor Haseeb-ul-Hasan on Sunday climbed a transmission tower after the party reportedly denied him a ticket for the upcoming Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) poll. Minutes after climbing the tower, the councilor went live on Facebook and made several controversial remarks against the party and its leaders.

Haseeb-ul-Hasan climbed the transmission tower near Shastri Park Metro Station in the city. He added that he felt cheated as the party had denied the ticket to him at the last minute.

Speaking about the party leaders Durgesh Pathak and Atishi he alleged they were not returning his documents and said if something happens to him, the two senior leaders of the party will be responsible.

In the video, he said, “Durgesh Pathak and Atishi will be responsible if I die. All of my papers, original documents, and my bank passbook have been seized. Tomorrow is the last day for filing nominations but they won’t give my documents to me even when I beg them to."

Haseeb-ul-Hasan added that he was not concerned with the party denying his tickets - he just wanted his documents back.

Later, when the media arrived, he told the reporters, “Had the media not come, Durgesh Pathak, Atishi, and Sanjay Singh wouldn't have returned my paper. They sold the ticket to Deepu Chaudhary for Rs 3 Cr, and demanded money from me but I don't have any.”

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



New Delhi: The Supreme Court has directed trial courts nationwide to halt surveys and effective orders in cases disputing the religious character of existing structures under the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991.

A Bench led by Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna, alongside Justices PV Sanjay Kumar and KV Viswanathan, stated that the Act expressly prohibits such suits and proceedings.

The Court highlighted that no fresh suits could be registered, nor any final orders passed in pending cases until the validity of the 1991 Act is decided. "As the matter is sub judice before this Court, we deem it fit to direct that no fresh suits shall be registered or proceedings be ordered. In the pending suits, courts would not pass any effective or final orders," the Bench ordered.