New Delhi: Former Chief Justice of India (CJI) D.Y. Chandrachud is once again at the centre of public attention, this time over a request for a special registration number for his newly purchased luxury car.
A letter dated July 28 from the Deputy Registrar of the Supreme Court to the Delhi Transport Commissioner has surfaced, urging the department to allot a specific registration number for a new Mercedes Benz E220 owned by the retired CJI. The request for priority allocation of a VIP number has raised eyebrows, particularly because it came officially from the Supreme Court registry rather than from the individual concerned.
This is not the first instance where Justice Chandrachud has faced scrutiny over vehicle number plates. In 2024, a photograph of one of his cars bearing the registration DL1 CJI 0001 went viral on social media. The image was posted by businessman Lloyd Mathias, who wrote: “Saw then Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud at a private event in Delhi. Couldn’t help noticing the number plate: DL1 CJI 0001. Imagine if the Chief Election Commissioner’s car bore DL1 CEC 0001!”
Following the latest development, Mathias again took to social media, claiming that Chandrachud has a “long-standing fetish for VVIP number plates.” He also reshared the old photograph, remarking: “This was from 2024, when he was still CJI. He had assigned himself the ‘CJI’ plate.”
Adding to the controversy, this request for a preferential number plate comes at a time when questions are still being raised about Justice Chandrachud’s delay in vacating the official Chief Justice bungalow post-retirement. The Supreme Court had to write to the central government requesting immediate steps for the vacation of the residence.
Now, the fresh request made through the Supreme Court Registry has sparked a new wave of criticism, with many questioning whether this is a case of procedural normalcy or a reflection of lingering influence from his time in office.
Legal observers and social media users alike are divided: while some see the request as an administrative formality, others believe it reflects a misuse of institutional channels for personal preferences. Critics argue that former high-ranking officials should refrain from leveraging their previous positions for privileges not meant to extend beyond retirement.
The Transport Department is yet to officially respond to the letter or confirm whether the requested number will be allotted.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
New Delhi (PTI): US-based IT firm Oracle is believed to have laid off approximately 12,000 staff in India, with another round of layoffs expected within a month, impacted employees said on Tuesday.
Globally, the company has fired around 30,000 employees.
"In India, around 12,000 employees have been laid off. The company is planning another mass layoff within a month," said two people impacted by the retrenchment, including one from the company's human resource department.
The company has approximately 30,000 employees in India, including those affected by the layoffs.
Oracle declined to comment on the development.
Oracle, in an email sent to staff, said the employees were informed about certain organisational changes and "because of these changes, a decision has been taken to streamline the operations, and as a result, unfortunately, the position you currently hold will become redundant".
The company has offered 15 days' salary to each employee who has completed a year of service in India, in addition to one month of unpaid wages till termination date, leave encashment, gratuity based on eligibility and pay for a one-month notice period.
Oracle has also offered a two-month salary as a top-up.
However, the severance package is available for those who voluntarily and amicably resign from the company.
An ex-employee of Oracle, Merugu Sridhar, said that he was laid off in September for protesting against the 16-hour work shift that the company has in India.
"I contacted my friends and those who are in human resources. They shared that most of the Indians working in the US with the company have been impacted because the local laws there are very strict when it comes to the retrenchment of their citizens," Sridhar said.
