'Gardan kaat doonga teri': Haryana CM Manohar Lal Khattar threatens his aide
Chandigarh: A video has emerged showing Haryana Chief Minister Manohar Lal Khattar losing his temper. In the video, Khattar is seen threatening his aide with an axe in his hand.
"Gardan kaat doonga teri (I will decapitate you)," Khattar can be heard telling the Bharatiya Janata Party leader, who had placed a crown on his head.
Holding an axe in his hand, Khattar is seen telling people during a rally that the public how the tool can be used to destroy enemies.
Immediately, a BJP leader standing behind the CM places a crown on his head. This clearly upsets the Haryana CM, who turns around and threatens to chop off the BJP leader’s head. "What are you doing? I will chop off your head. Move aside," said Khattar.
The Haryana CM, later, defended his arrogance, saying he said those words because he did not like to be honoured with a silver crown.
Congress spokesperson Randeep Singh Surjewala also tweeted the video, saying anger and arrogance are injurious to health. "Why does Khattar saheb get angry?"
Here's his tweet:
ग़ुस्सा और अहंकार सेहत के लिए हानिकारक हैं!
— Randeep Singh Surjewala (@rssurjewala) September 11, 2019
खट्टर साहेब को ग़ुस्सा क्यों आता है?
फरसा लेकर अपने ही नेता को कहते हैं -
"गर्दन काट दूंगा तेरी" ⬇️
फिर जनता के साथ क्या करेंगे? pic.twitter.com/hCQJAlG7Sx
Courtesy: www.timesnownews.com
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Supreme Court grants anticipatory bail to Pawan Khera in Assam Police FIR
New Delhi: The Supreme Court of India on Friday granted anticipatory bail to Congress leader Pawan Khera in connection with an FIR registered by the Assam Police.
The case arose from a complaint filed by Riniki Bhuyan Sarma, wife of Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma, over allegations made by Khera that she possessed multiple passports.
A bench comprising Justice JK Maheshwari and Justice AS Chandurkar delivered the judgment after reserving orders on Khera’s petition challenging the dismissal of his anticipatory bail plea by the Gauhati High Court.
In its ruling, the Supreme Court observed that the High Court’s findings were not based on a proper appreciation of the material on record and appeared to be erroneous, particularly in shifting the burden onto the accused.
The bench further held that the High Court erred in making observations regarding an offence under Section 339 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, noting that the FIR did not contain any such allegation. It stated that such conclusions could not have been drawn merely on the basis of submissions made by the Advocate General.
