Google Cloud CEO Thomas Kurian says AI will enhance human work, not replace jobs
California: In an interview with Big Technology, Google Cloud CEO Thomas Kurian reassured the tech workers regarding the fear around AI. He stated that AI is only a tool to enhance human potential and not a way to replace them.
Citing Google Cloud’s Customer Engagement Suite, an AI-powered tool introduced last year to streamline customer service, Kurian noted that while many clients initially feared job cuts, the results have shown the opposite.
“Almost none of our clients have let anyone go,” he said. “When people asked, ‘Does this mean we won’t need customer service agents anymore?’ the answer is no. It simply means agents can dedicate more time to challenging queries and meaningful engagement.”
Kurian emphasised that AI should not be viewed as a threat but as a bridge between current and future workforce potential. “There is a middle ground.”
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Court can reject anticipatory bail but cannot direct accused to surrender: SC
New Delhi (PTI): A court can reject anticipatory bail of an accused but it has no jurisdiction to direct him to surrender before the trial court, the Supreme Court has said.
A bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and Ujjal Bhuyan made the observation while hearing a plea filed by a man accused of cheating and forgery.
"If the court wants to reject the anticipatory bail, it may do so, but the court has no jurisdiction to say that the petitioner should now surrender," the bench said.
The Jharkhand High Court had rejected anticipatory bail plea of the accused and asked him to surrender and seek regular bail.
In this case, a complaint had been filed before a magistrate alleging offences under Sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 420 (cheating), 467 (forgery of valuable security), 468 (forgery for purpose of cheating), 471 (using forged document) and 120B read with 34 of the IPC, in connection with a land dispute.
The high court had dismissed the second anticipatory bail application of the accused on the ground that no new circumstances were shown.
It had relied on its earlier order rejecting his first anticipatory bail plea, in which the court directed the petitioner to surrender before the trial court and seek regular bail in terms of the decision in Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI.
The top court said such a direction was wholly without jurisdiction and said that if a court chooses to reject anticipatory bail, it may do so, but it cannot compel the accused to surrender.
