Hyderabad man duped of ₹27 lakh in online trading scam
Hyderabad: A 38-year-old man from Hyderabad was cheated of over ₹27 lakh in an online stock market trading scam, police said.
The victim came across a trading-related advertisement on Facebook and contacted the persons behind it. The fraudsters posed as stock market traders and added him to a WhatsApp group where several people, claiming to be experts and assuring high profits and quick returns, convinced him to invest money.
“Initially, the victim was asked to download a mobile application called ADVPMA for trading. At first, he invested ₹10,000 and received profits. He thought it was a good idea to invest more money. Over time, he transferred a total of ₹27.05 lakh,” NDTV quoted the cybercrime DCP as saying.
ALSO READ: Detaining authority didn't apply mind, relied on irrelevant material: Sonam Wangchuk's wife to SC
The application continued to show a balance of ₹81.69 lakh, including profits. However, when the victim attempted to withdraw the amount, the withdrawal option was blocked.
“The people running the WhatsApp group then demanded an additional ₹50 lakh, claiming it was needed for processing and taxes,” the cybercrime officer said.
Realising he had been cheated, the victim approached the Hyderabad police and lodged a complaint. A case has been registered and an investigation is under way.
Authorities have advised reporting such frauds immediately to the cybercrime helpline 1930 or through the official cybercrime portal.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
'Modi will never succeed in suppressing voice of Tamil people': Rahul on 'Jana Nayagan' row
New Delhi (PTI): Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Tuesday alleged that the Centre's "attempt to block" Vijay-starrer "Jana Nayagan" is an attack on Tamil culture, and said Prime Minister Narendra Modi will never succeed in "suppressing the voice of the Tamil people".
Gandhi's remarks come on a day he is on a visit to poll-bound Tamil Nadu where the row over actor-turned-politician Vijay's Tamil film has snowballed into a major issue.
The producer of the film approached the Supreme Court, challenging a January 9 interim order of the Madras High Court that stayed a single-judge direction to grant the CBFC clearance to the movie.
The Madras High Court has left the fate of the film, which has drawn attention for its political overtones, in limbo.
In a post on X, Gandhi said, "The I&B Ministry's attempt to block 'Jana Nayagan' is an attack on Tamil culture."
ALSO READ: Woman’s video of crossing busy Bengaluru road goes viral, calls it "negotiating with destiny"
"Mr Modi, you will never succeed in suppressing the voice of the Tamil people," the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha said.
KVN Productions LLP has filed an appeal against the order passed by a division bench of the high court.
Vijay recently launched his political party, Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK). "Jana Nayagan", which is widely publicised as Vijay's final film before his full-fledged entry into politics, was slated for a Pongal release on January 9.
However, the film ran into last-minute hurdles after the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) did not issue certification in time.
On January 9, the division bench's order came hours after Justice PT Asha directed the CBFC to give clearance to "Jana Nayagan", setting aside the film board's directive to refer the matter to a review committee.
The first bench, comprising Chief Justice M M Shrivastava and G Arul Murugan, on an appeal filed by the CBFC, granted an interim stay against the single judge's verdict.
Earlier, allowing the plea of KVN Productions seeking a direction to CBFC to issue a censor certificate, Justice Asha said once the board had decided to grant the certificate, the chairperson had no power to send the matter to the review committee.
The film board immediately preferred an appeal against the order.
Additional Solicitor General ARL Sundaresan and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who appeared through video conferencing, outlined the grounds for the appeal before the division bench.
The January 6 letter of CBFC, which was communicated to the producer of the film, informing him that the matter was referred to the revising committee, was not at all under challenge. But the single judge set aside the letter and gave the above direction.
In its order, the division bench said the petition was filed on January 6, and the CBFC was not granted sufficient opportunity to file its reply.
There shall be a stay, the bench added and ordered notice to the producer of the movie and posted the matter to January 21.
