IAS officer Dr. Nagarjun B. Gowda at the Centre of ₹51 crore mining fine row, denies allegations
Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh: A major controversy has erupted in Madhya Pradesh’s administrative circles involving IAS officer Dr. Nagarjun B. Gowda, who is accused of drastically reducing a ₹51 crore illegal mining fine to merely ₹4,032 during his tenure as Additional District Magistrate (ADM) in Harda district. The allegations have led to intense public debate, with demands for greater transparency and accountability within the bureaucracy.
The issue came to light following a complaint by RTI activist Anand Jat, who accused Dr. Gowda of favouring a private company, Path India Limited, in a case linked to alleged illegal mining activities connected to the Indore–Betul National Highway project.
The controversy: From ₹51 crore to ₹4,032
According to official records and media reports, Path India Company was working on the Indore–Betul National Highway when it allegedly excavated 3.11 lakh cubic meters of murram soil in Andherikheda village, Harda district, without obtaining the necessary permissions. The then ADM, Praveen Phulpagare, had issued a notice imposing a penalty of ₹51.67 crore against the company for unauthorized extraction.
However, following Phulpagare’s transfer, Dr. Nagarjun B. Gowda assumed charge as ADM. The case came up for review during his tenure, and in the final order, the fine amount was reduced to just ₹4,032, reportedly on the grounds that the previous estimates were unsupported by verifiable documentation.
Dr. Gowda’s decision has now become the focal point of public and media scrutiny, with critics questioning how a fine amounting to crores could be reduced to a few thousand rupees in an official proceeding.
RTI activist’s allegations: “A clear case of favouritism”
RTI activist Anand Jat, who brought the matter to light, claims that the fine reduction indicates possible favouritism or compromise between the administration and the company. He alleges that while official records claim the absence of photographic or video evidence of mining, local villagers reportedly possess visual proof of large-scale excavation.
In multiple statements, Jat has accused Dr. Gowda of “manipulating the case records” and “settling the issue through a backdoor deal.” He demanded an independent inquiry, arguing that the fine reduction has caused a significant loss to the exchequer and undermined public confidence in administrative fairness.
“Reducing a fine of ₹51 crore to ₹4,000 cannot be justified on any administrative ground. The documents clearly point to a cover-up,” Jat stated.
Dr. Nagarjun B. Gowda’s response: ‘All actions were legal and evidence-based’
Facing mounting criticism, Dr. Gowda issued a formal clarification, categorically denying all allegations of corruption or bias.
According to his statement, the previous ADM had only issued a notice, not a finalized penalty, and the final adjudication was completed during his tenure after considering all available evidence.
“The ₹51 crore amount was not a finalized fine but a proposed figure in the initial notice. The subsequent inquiry found no substantial evidence to support the claims of large-scale illegal mining. The Tehsildar’s panchnama lacked verification, and the documentation was weak. Therefore, based on the available material and due legal procedure, the fine was calculated at ₹4,032,” Dr. Gowda said.
He further clarified that no appeal or objection was filed against his decision in the following two years, which, in his view, validates the legality and procedural soundness of his order.
“The decision was made on record, following due process, and in compliance with the legal framework. I am open to any review or inquiry. There was no wrongdoing on my part,” he added.
Who is IAS Dr. Nagarjun B. Gowda?
Dr. Nagarjun B. Gowda, born on May 9, 1992, in Mandya district, Karnataka, is a doctor-turned-civil servant who secured All India Rank 418 in the UPSC Civil Services Examination 2018. A medical graduate from the Mandya Institute of Medical Sciences, he worked as a resident doctor before cracking the country’s toughest exam while continuing his medical practice.
Initially allotted to the Manipur cadre, Dr. Gowda was later transferred to the Madhya Pradesh cadre upon marriage to his batchmate IAS Srushti Jayant Deshmukh, who ranked fifth among women in the same batch.
Both officers have a strong following among UPSC aspirants and are often regarded as “celebrity IAS officers” due to their online presence, motivational talks, and co-authored book on ethics.
Currently, Dr. Gowda serves as the CEO of the Khandwa District Panchayat, while his wife, Srushti Deshmukh, is the CEO of Burhanpur District Panchayat.
The revelation has sparked a wave of outrage on social media, with many users questioning how such a dramatic reduction could occur without higher administrative oversight. Memes, posts, and hashtags targeting the officer and the Madhya Pradesh administration have flooded platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and Instagram.
Despite the growing controversy, the Madhya Pradesh government has not yet announced any formal inquiry or review into the case. However, senior bureaucrats, speaking on condition of anonymity, have suggested that the matter may soon attract the attention of the State Vigilance Department or Lokayukta, given the magnitude of the alleged discrepancy.
Civil society groups and RTI activists have also written to the Chief Secretary of Madhya Pradesh, demanding that the decision be revisited to ensure transparency and prevent what they describe as “erosion of public trust in governance.”
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Trump says Pak PM told him millions would have died without his intervention
New York/Washington (PTI): US President Donald Trump has said that Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif told him that 35 million people would have died if it were not for his intervention in stopping the war between India and Pakistan.
In his over 100-minute-long State of the Union address on Tuesday, Trump repeated his claim that he had helped prevent what could have turned into a nuclear war between the two South Asian neighbours.
“In my first 10 months, I ended eight wars... including Pakistan and India, which would have been a nuclear war. Thirty-five million people, said the Prime Minister of Pakistan, would have died if it were not for my involvement,” Trump said.
The US President has previously made similar claims, stating that Sharif had credited him with saving millions of lives by helping end the conflict between the nuclear-armed neighbours. On earlier occasions, Trump had cited lower figures, including 25 million and later 10 million lives.
Trump has repeatedly claimed credit for stopping the conflict between India and Pakistan, an assertion he has now made about 100 times since May 10 last year, when he announced on social media that India and Pakistan agreed to a “full and immediate” ceasefire after a “long night” of talks mediated by Washington.
India has consistently denied any third-party intervention.
In his address, Trump also listed several other conflicts that he claimed to have helped resolve, including Cambodia and Thailand, Kosovo and Serbia, Israel and Iran, Egypt and Ethiopia, Armenia and Azerbaijan, the Congo and Rwanda, and the war in Gaza, which he said was now proceeding “at a very low level”.
Trump said the US is restoring security at home and abroad.
“We're proudly restoring safety for Americans at home and we are also restoring security for Americans abroad. Our country has never been stronger,” the president said in his second State of the Union address of his second term in the White House.
At one point, some Democratic lawmakers interrupted Trump's speech, prompting him to respond, “Isn't it funny? Sick people.”
STORY | Trump says Pak PM told him millions would have died without his intervention
— Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) February 25, 2026
US President Donald Trump has said that Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif told him that 35 million people would have died if it were not for his intervention in stopping the war between… https://t.co/NnkX8w3Lrg
