Prayagraj: In a speech at an event organised by the legal cell of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) at the Allahabad High Court's historic library hall, Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav made several remarks that are bound to spark controversy. His statements, particularly those about the functioning of India, minority communities, and the need for a Uniform Civil Code (UCC), have drawn significant criticism for their inflammatory nature.
Justice Yadav asserted, "I have no hesitation in stating that this is Hindustan, and this country will function according to the wishes of the majority living here. This is the law. It is not about speaking as a High Court Judge; rather, the law operates in accordance with the bahusankyak (majority). Consider this in the context of a family or society - only what ensures the welfare and happiness of the majority will be accepted."
He did not stop at this controversial declaration. The judge went further, using the derogatory term “kathmullah,” a slur commonly used to describe Muslims, which he referred to while discussing extremism. He said, "This may not be the right word... but I won't hesitate to say it because they are harmful to the country... they are detrimental, against the nation, and people who incite the public. They are the kind of people who do not want the country to progress, and we need to be cautious of them."
In his speech, Justice Yadav also highlighted the cultural differences he believes exist between communities in India. "In our country, we are taught from a young age to respect all living beings, even the smallest animals, and to avoid harming them. This lesson becomes a part of who we are, which is perhaps why we are more tolerant and compassionate, feeling pain when others suffer. But this isn't the case for everyone. In our culture, children are raised with guidance towards God, taught Vedic mantras, and instilled with the values of non-violence. However, in some other cultures, children grow up witnessing the slaughter of animals, which makes it difficult to expect them to develop tolerance and compassion."
Regarding the Uniform Civil Code (UCC), a topic frequently discussed by right-wing groups, Justice Yadav voiced his opinion, stating that the personal laws of the Muslim community, such as those permitting multiple marriages, Halala, and Triple Talaq, should be reformed. He said, "You say, we have the right to say 'triple talaq,' and not give maintenance to women. This right will not work. UCC isn't something that VHP, RSS, or Hinduism advocates. The country's top court also talks about it... This is the historic library hall of the court, where so many great personalities have been..." He emphasised that these practices are incompatible with the Constitution and the rights of women.
In a particularly provocative remark, Justice Yadav stated, "A woman will receive maintenance, bigamy will not be allowed, and a man will have only one wife, not four. If one woman receives maintenance while another does not, it leads to discrimination, which is against the Constitution." He further went on to say that Muslim personal laws, including the practice of Triple Talaq, should not be allowed, as they contradict the constitutional guarantee of equality.
When discussing the issue of national identity and religious tolerance, Justice Yadav said: “Being a Hindu is not limited to those who bathe in the Ganga or apply chandan (sandalwood). Anyone who views this land as their mother and is ready to sacrifice their life for the nation during a crisis, irrespective of their religious beliefs—whether they follow the Quran or the Bible—is a Hindu.”
In his closing comments, Justice Yadav discussed the Ayodhya judgment. He stated, “Could you have ever imagined seeing the Ram Mandir with your own eyes? Many of our ancestors made sacrifices with the hope of seeing Ram Lalla freed and witnessing the grand temple’s construction. Although they couldn’t live to see it, they played their part, and now, we are witnessing it ourselves.”
Justice Yadav also cautioned against misinterpreting Hindu values of non-violence, stating, “While Hindus are known for their non-violence and kindness, it should not be mistaken for cowardice. We must teach our children that the country, our religious practices, and our revered personalities should always come first.”
The remarks made by Justice Yadav have sparked strong reactions, particularly from the All India Lawyers’ Union, which has condemned his statements as a violation of the oath of office and accused him of promoting hate speech. The Union has called for the Supreme Court to intervene and take appropriate action against the judge. They also condemned the very participation of a sitting judge in an event organised by a right-wing group like the VHP, accusing it of being shameful.
This controversy follows a similar incident in September 2024 when another Allahabad High Court judge, Justice Rohit Ranjan Agarwal, made inflammatory remarks about the future demographic changes in India, suggesting that Hindus could become a minority due to religious conversions.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Bengaluru (PTI): Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister D K Shivakumar on Monday expressed shock and grief over the blast that occurred near Red Fort in Delhi that claimed at least eight lives and injured several people.
Taking to social media platform 'X', he wished a speedy recovery to the injured.
"Deeply shocked and disturbed by the tragic blast near Red Fort, Delhi. The loss of innocent lives is heartbreaking. My thoughts and prayers are with the victims and their families. Wishing a speedy recovery to the injured," Shivakumar said.
A high-intensity explosion ripped through a car near the Red Fort metro station, gutting several vehicles, officials said.
Twenty-four people were injured in the blast that took place on a busy evening when the area was milling with people. The injured were taken to the LNJP hospital, a few kilometres away.
