Instagram will take your post down without questions if it’s reported by BJP’s Amit Malviya: Report
The Wire’s exclusive investigative report
New Delhi: In an exclusive investigative report posted by one of India’s leading independent media outlets The Wire, the website has claimed popular social media platform Instagram will take down a post without any questions if the post is reported by Amit Malviya, the IT Cell Chief of BJP.
In the report, worked on by The Wire’s Deputy Editor Jahnavi Sen, the website claimed Instagram had recently took down a video posted by ‘Superhumans of Cringetopia’ an anonymous satirical account citing that the post violated the platform’s ‘nudity and sexual content guideline.
The post, however, was only showing a man, a resident of Uttar Pradesh Prabhakar Maurya worshipping a statue of state chief minister Adityanath. The post was also not in violation of the guidelines of Instagram as both the man and the idol in the video were fully clothed, and there was no visible sexual connotation whatsoever, the report added.
Days after reporting on this confusing takedown, The Wire has learned from a well-placed source at Meta that it was not, in fact, due to an algorithmic glitch. The post was taken down – and that too just minutes after it was posted – only because it was reported by Instagram user @amitmalviya. That's the handle belonging to Amit Malviya, president of the Bharatiya Janata Party's infamous IT Cell, the report further elaborated.
The report further cited an internal report of Instagram which it claimed had accessed, to establish that the reported post was taken down immediately without the company’s moderator having a look at it and only based on the identity of the reporter Amit Malviya.
It further quoted a source at the Meta, the company that runs Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram and is owned by Mark Zuckerberg, and added any post that Malviya reports is treated the same way – an immediate removal from the platform, no questions asked.
In the month of September, the report claimed Malviya had reported 705 posts all of which were taken down immediately, the report quoted the source as saying.
As The Wire has reported, @cringearchivist has seen seven of its posts removed by Instagram in the last few months. This, the administrators of the satirical account said, has forced them to go 'private' (only followers can see their posts), thereby limiting their growth and reach. Now, new followers have to fill out a form before they are allowed to see the content posted on the page.
“Other removed posts from the @cringearchivist page, The Wire has now learned, were also reported by none other than Malviya. While two were flagged for sexual content – the post on the Adityanath temple and another that amplified the voice of a female influencer who was posting about creepy DMs she got – the rest were taken down citing 'extreme graphic violence, despite the videos not showing violence. Instagram's rate and speed of takedowns had worried the handle's administrators, who thought their page in its entirety may be deleted if this continued.” The report added.
Malviya, the Instagram report on the @cringearchivist post states, is part of Meta's 'XCheck' or 'Cross Check' program. This program – a closely guarded company secret until it was first exposed by the Wall Street Journal in September 2021 – allows a list of 'elite' accounts on Meta platforms (belonging mostly to celebrities and politicians) to flout the rules the company claims applies to everyone under the garb of protecting these high-profile users. The programme was designed to prevent the bad press that sometimes came from actions against celebrity users.
“Some users are “whitelisted”—rendered immune from enforcement actions—while others are allowed to post rule-violating material pending Facebook employee reviews that often never come,” Wall Street Journal reported then. The Instagram report on the @cringearchivist posts that were removed makes it clear the XCheck privileges are even more sweeping – these users can also have posts taken down as they please, without the company bothering to check whether there is justifiable cause.
The XCheck program was criticised even within Meta, with an internal review finding, according to the Wall Street Journal, that “Unlike the rest of our community, these people can violate our standards without any consequences.”
Globally, according to the Wall Street Journal, 5.8 million users were a part of the XCheck program in 2020. Users are not typically told when they are included in this privileged list, the newspaper noted. While some of the names revealed by the newspaper were celebrities with hundreds of millions of followers, like the Brazilian footballer Neymar, Malviya has less than 5,000 followers on Instagram and 15,000 followers on Facebook.
The internal report makes clear that after Malviya reported @cringearchivist's post, no human intervention was deemed necessary by Meta – the post was gone from the platform immediately, and no review process was seen as “required”, The Wire’s report added.
The company has given Malviya two levels of privileges – he can post as he likes, without the rules governing the platform applying to him, and he can impose his will as he pleases to have posts critical of the BJP, the Union government, or right-wing Hindu politics, deleted, it further added.
For someone who regularly uses social media for disinformation – for instance, last month posting photos from 2019 while claiming that they portrayed a recent Narendra Modi rally, or alleging that a recent New York Times article on the Delhi government's education programme was a 'paid promotion' – a privilege like this underlines that general users' best interests aren't Meta's priority here. Because while the rest of us may not be able to get away with performing such a tenuous relationship with the truth on Meta platforms, or refusing to let any dissent or criticism exist, Malviya sure can. The report added a conclusion.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
AAP alleges 'deep-rooted' conspiracy to kill Kejriwal, BJP terms it 'drama'
New Delhi, Oct 26: The AAP on Saturday alleged the BJP was conspiring to "kill" its convener Arvind Kejriwal and had become "an enemy of his life". The ruling party warned that the BJP would be responsible if anything happened to the former chief minister.
Leader of Opposition in the Delhi Assembly Vijender Gupta dismissed the AAP's allegations, saying it was yet another "drama" by the AAP to defame the BJP ahead of the assembly polls.
The AAP had on Friday claimed that Kejriwal, a Z-plus protectee, was attacked by "BJP goons" during his 'padyatra' (foot march) in west Delhi's Vikaspuri, a charge trashed by the saffron party.
However, no video of the alleged attack was made available by the party. Police said they had not received any official complaint from the AAP.
Addressing a press conference on Saturday, AAP MP Sanjay Singh alleged police were complicit in the incident.
"Police complicity in the incident clearly shows a deep-rooted conspiracy to kill Kejriwal. The BJP has become an enemy of his life," he said.
There was no immediate response from police to the Rajya Sabha MP's claim.
Singh said that despite Friday's incident, Kejriwal would carry on with the 'padyatra' as scheduled.
AAP leaders including Kejriwal are undertaking 'padyatras' in different assembly segments of the city in the run-up to the Delhi Assembly polls, likely to be held in February 2025.
Asked why the AAP had not filed a complaint regarding the alleged attack on Kejriwal, Singh said police could take cognisance of the incident and launch a probe.
It would not have happened if police were impartial. Police officers did not do anything to stop the "attackers" who belonged to the BJP's youth wing, he claimed, adding the AAP was seeking legal opinion on the matter.
He also accused BJP leaders of supporting the "attackers".
Singh said Kejriwal would "neither stop nor bow down" and continue to fight for the people of Delhi.
If anything happens to Kejriwal, then the BJP would be responsible for it. Even if Kejriwal suffers a scratch, Delhi's people would take revenge on the BJP, he said.
At another press conference, Delhi cabinet minister Saurabh Bharadwaj claimed one of the attackers was the vice president of the BJP's Delhi Yuva Morcha.
"BJP Yuva Morcha functionaries attacked Kejriwal. One of the attackers is the vice president of BJP Yuva Morcha of Delhi and the second is the general secretary," he said.
The two BJP leaders, who were dancing after attacking Kejriwal, had lost the councillor elections, claimed Bharadwaj.
BJP leader Gupta rubbished the AAP's claims.
"Despite blaming the BJP, no complaint has been filed by the AAP over the alleged attack on Kejriwal, which shows that the party is trying to play the victim card and gain sympathy by trying to defame the BJP before the assembly polls," he said.
The BJP leader said the AAP is worried about the "waning public support" and is attempting to confuse people through such tactics.
The area where Kejriwal was allegedly attacked is not an AAP stronghold and hence, the party "concocted" the story to gain sympathy, Gupta alleged.
