KCR-Uddhav-Pawar meet: Such unity experiments have failed in the past, says Devendra Fadnavis
Aurangabad, Feb 21: A day after Telangana Chief Minister K Chandrasekhar Rao met his Maharashtra counterpart Uddhav Thackeray and NCP supremo Sharad Pawar in Mumbai to get parties to unite against the Narendra Modi government at the Centre, Maharashtra BJP leader Devendra Fadnavis on Monday said such experiments had been carried out in the past and had failed.
Speaking to reporters in Aurangabad, Fadnavis said it was not new for chief ministers of states to meet in this manner, adding that Rao had met him as well when he was CM of Maharashtra between 2014 and 2019.
"Earlier too, these leaders had come together (to take on the BJP) ahead of the 2019 Lok Sabha polls. However, nothing came out of it. Such experiments (of unity of non-BJP parties) had been done in the past in several states but there was no effect," Fadnavis said.
The BJP leader went to claim that his party would soon be the leading one in Telangana, currently ruled by Rao's TRS.
"In the 2019 Lok Sabha polls, the BJP won four seats in Telangana. Our party will be number one in that state in the coming period," Fadnavis asserted.
Replying to a query on action by the Mumbai civic body against Narayan Rane in connection with his bungalow, Fadnavis said the state government was indulging in "revenge politics" against Rane and Kirit Somaiya, a former LS MP who has been routinely making corruption allegations against Shiv Sena leaders and state ministers.
Speaking on local issues, Fadnavis said the MVA government had "murdered" schemes created during his tenure as CM to make Marathwada drought-free.
"To make this region drought-free, we planned the Marathwada water grid project. We floated tenders for five districts and three were in process. But this government wrapped up this project with slow poisoning," he claimed.
"The state government didn't say they are cancelling the scheme. But they brought it on a small geographical area of the region and said they will implement the rest in the future. Papers and plans have not moved further since," Fadnavis added.
The water pipeline project for Aurangabad city was also starved of funds by the MVA government, he alleged.
He added that electricity supply to farm plots gets disconnected over arrears of even small amounts, whereas bills of public representatives drawing salaries of Rs 2.5 lakh are being paid by the state government, which is unfair on farmers.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Congress using hijab issue to pacify minority anger, alleges Karnataka LoP R Ashoka
Bengaluru: Leader of Opposition in the Assembly R. Ashoka has accused the Congress government of using the hijab issue to placate what he described as discontent among minority voters after the Davanagere by-election.
In a post on X on Wednesday, Ashoka alleged that the state government, instead of addressing issues such as price rise, corruption, farmers’ distress and law and order, was attempting to retain its minority vote base by reviving the hijab issue.
Referring to the 2022 dress code introduced by the BJP government, which prohibited hijab in schools and colleges, Ashoka said the Karnataka High Court had upheld the policy and emphasised the importance of discipline in educational institutions.
He questioned the Congress government’s move to revisit the issue and asked whether setting aside the court-backed policy to benefit one community could be described as secularism.
Ashoka further alleged that while the government was willing to permit hijab, it continued to prohibit saffron shawls.
He accused the government of dividing students on religious lines rather than treating schools and colleges as spaces of equality.
Drawing a comparison with Mamata Banerjee’s government in West Bengal, Ashoka claimed that excessive appeasement politics had harmed the state and warned that the Congress in Karnataka could face a similar political response.
He said voters in Karnataka would teach the Congress a lesson for what he termed “vote-bank politics” and for compromising constitutional and judicial principles.
