Kerala govt urges Centre to amend fireworks rules for Thrissur Pooram festival
Thrissur (Kerala) (PTI): The Left government in Kerala has taken strong exception to the recent gazette notification issued by the Centre stipulating certain conditions for conducting fireworks, contending that these would be detrimental to the smooth conduct of the iconic Thrissur Pooram festival.
In a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, State Revenue Minister K Rajan expressed that the notification issued by the Union Ministry of Commerce and Industry on October 11 has brought "utter disappointment" to Pooram enthusiasts, for whom fireworks are an "integral part" of the festival.
He sought the prime minister's personal intervention to amend the rules in order to allow the Thrissur Pooram to proceed with all its festivities and rituals.
Among other stipulations, Condition No 2 requires that the licensed magazine be located at least 200 metres away from the display site.
Noting that under the Explosive Rules of 2008, the prescribed distance had been 45 metres, the letter stated that the increase in this regard is "quite unnecessary and illogical."
Rajan told PTI that this condition would make it impossible to hold fireworks displays.
He further pointed out that Condition No. 6 of the notification requires the assembly shed to be at least 100 metres away from the display site. As the assembly shed will be empty during the display, he argued that there is no logic in enforcing this distance limit.
The letter also mentioned that Condition No 4 demands a 100-metre distance between spectators and the display area.
"If the condition that the audience must be kept 100 metres away from the barricades of the fire line is enforced, it would make it difficult for spectators to enjoy the fireworks," Rajan said.
He suggested that modifying the distance to 50-70 metres from start to finish would be sufficient.
Speaking to reporters in Thrissur, Rajan alleged that there was an attempt to sabotage the Thrissur Pooram festival and the issue will be brought to the attention of relevant officials in the central government, including those from Thrissur.
Rajan also said that steps will be taken to initiate official communication with the Centre under the leadership of the chief minister on this matter.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Supreme Court restrains government from acting on NCPCR's orders regarding madrasas
New Delhi: On Monday, October 21, the Supreme Court restrained both the Union Government and State Governments from acting upon the communications issued by the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) concerning the withdrawal of recognition of madrasas that do not comply with the Right to Education (RTE) Act, 2009. The Court also halted the inspections of madrasas based on NCPCR’s directives.
A bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justice JB Pardiwala, and Justice Manoj Misra issued this interim order while hearing a writ petition filed by Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind, an Islamic clerics' body, challenging the NCPCR's actions.
The controversy began on June 7, 2024, when the NCPCR directed the Chief Secretary of Uttar Pradesh to withdraw recognition from madrasas that did not comply with the RTE Act. This was followed by another communication on June 25, 2024, asking the Ministry of Education to instruct all States and Union Territories to inspect madrasas with UDISE Codes and revoke recognition from those non-compliant with the RTE Act.
Subsequent actions included a June 26, 2024, directive from the Uttar Pradesh Chief Secretary instructing District Collectors to investigate all government-aided and recognised madrasas in the state that admit non-Muslim children. A similar directive was issued by the Tripura Government on August 28, 2024. The Union Government also wrote to all States/UTs on July 10, 2024, urging compliance with the NCPCR's instructions.
Challenging these orders as a violation of the religious rights of minorities under Article 30 of the Constitution, the petitioners approached the Supreme Court. The Court, while issuing notice, directed that the NCPCR’s communications dated June 7 and June 25, 2024, and the corresponding actions by the Uttar Pradesh Chief Secretary and the Governments of India and Tripura, shall not be acted upon until further orders.
Additionally, the bench granted the petitioner liberty to implead all States and Union Territories in the petition following a request by Senior Advocate Indira Jaising.
