In an effort to chronicle individuals involved in the hazardous cleaning of septic tanks and sewers, the government has collected data from more than 3,000 urban local bodies across 29 states and union territories. Of the 38,000 workers profiled thus far, 91.9% are from SC, ST, or OBC categories. The data reveals that 68.9% workers belong to the SC community, 14.7% from OBCs, 8.3% from STs, and 8% belong to the general category.
According to data presented in Parliament, 377 laborers died between 2019 and 2023 while carrying out dangerous sewer and septic tank cleaning. The profiling is a part of the NAMASTE initiative of the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, which was started to automate sewage cleaning and stop dangerous sewer cleaning methods and more fatalities. In order to do this, the program replaces the previous Self-Employment Scheme for Rehabilitation of Manual Scavengers (SRMS). Its goal is to improve working conditions and safety for sanitation employees.
However, the government continues to assert that manual scavenging has been eliminated from India and is now concentrating on the dangers of cleaning septic tanks and sewers. Based on the definitions of their Rehabilitation Act and the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers, a distinction has been made here.
NAMASTE serves all categories of workers engaged in sewage cleaning, including machine operators, cleaners, and drivers of desludging trucks, in addition to manual scavengers. It attempts to create a national profile of these workers, instructs them in safe procedures, equips them with safety gear, and offers financial support to help them launch their own sanitation businesses, or "sanipreneurs."
3,326 urban local bodies have started profiling since the scheme's inception by logging about 38,000 SSWs. Actually, 2,364 urban entities reported having fewer than 10 SSWs apiece, and 283 claimed having no SSWs at all. India employs about one lakh core sanitation personnel throughout its 4,800 urban local bodies, according to data from the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs.
To safeguard the welfare and safety of these workers, the NAMASTE program developed into an extensive database. During the 2023–24 fiscal year, 31,999 SSWs were verified, Rs 2.26 crore in capital subsidies for alternative work opportunities were granted to 191 workers and their families, and additional Rs 10.6 crore in subsidies were given for sanitation projects that would benefit 413 workers and their families.
Kerala, Rajasthan, and Jammu & Kashmir are among the twelve states and union territories that have been profiled; 17 more states and territories, including Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, and Uttar Pradesh, are currently in the process of being profiled. Among the states that run their own programs independently and don't submit data to the federal government are Tamil Nadu and Odisha.
While some states, like Karnataka and Kerala, have outreach initiatives in place to encourage involvement in the profile process, Andhra Pradesh went door-to-door to obtain documented details by visiting homes and workplaces.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Kochi (PTI): The prosecution had "miserably" failed to prove the conspiracy charge against Dileep in the sensational 2017 actress sexual assault case, a local court has observed while citing inconsistencies and lack of sufficient evidence against the Malayalam star.
The full judgement of Ernakulam District and Principal Sessions Court Judge Honey M Varghese was released late on Friday, and has revealed the judge also pointing out at unsustainable arguments put forth by the prosecution.
"The prosecution miserably failed to prove the conspiracy between accused No.1 (Pulsar Suni) and accused No.8 (Dileep) in executing the offence against the victim," the court held.
It examined in detail, the prosecution's allegation that Dileep had hired the prime accused to sexually assault the survivor and record visuals, including close-up footage of a gold ring she was wearing, to establish her identity.
On page 1130 of the judgment, under paragraph 703, the court framed the issue as whether the prosecution's contention that NS Sunil (Pulsar Suni) recorded visuals of the gold ring worn by the victim at the time of the occurrence, so as to clearly disclose her identity, was sustainable.
The prosecution contended Dileep and Suni had planned the recording so that the actress' identity would be unmistakable, with the video of the gold ring intended to convince Dileep that the visuals were genuine.
However, the court noted that this contention was not stated in the first charge sheet and was introduced only in the second one.
As part of this claim, a gold ring was seized after the victim produced it before the police.
The court observed that multiple statements of the victim were recorded from February 18, 2017, following the incident, and that she first raised allegations against Dileep only on June 3, 2017.
Even on that day, nothing was mentioned about filming of the ring as claimed by the prosecution, the court said.
The prosecution failed to explain why the victim did not disclose this fact at the earliest available opportunities.
It further noted that although the victim had viewed the sexual assault visuals twice, she did not mention any specific recording of the gold ring on those occasions, which remained unexplained.
The court also examined the approvers' statements.
One approver told the magistrate that Dileep had instructed Pulsar Suni to record the victim's wedding ring.
The court observed that no such wedding ring was available with her at that time.
During the trial, the approver changed his version, the court said.
The Special Public Prosecutor put a leading question to the approver on whether Dileep had instructed the recording of the ring, after which he deposed that the instruction was to record it to prove the victim's identity.
The court observed that the approver changed his account to corroborate the victim's evidence.
When the same question was put to another approver, he repeated the claim during the trial but admitted he had never stated this fact before the investigating officer.
The court noted that the second approver even went to the extent of claiming Dileep had instructed the execution of the crime as the victim's engagement was over.
This showed that the evidence of the second approver regarding the shooting of the ring was untrue, as her engagement had taken place after the crime.
The court further observed that the visuals themselves clearly revealed the victim's identity and that there was no need to capture images of the ring to establish identity.
In paragraph 887, the court examined the alleged motive behind the crime and noted that in the first charge sheet, the prosecution had claimed that accused persons 1 to 6 had kidnapped the victim with the common intention of capturing nude visuals to extort money by threatening to circulate them and there was no mention about Dileep's role in it.
The court also rejected the prosecution's claim that the accused had been planning the assault on Dileep's instructions since 2013, noting that the allegation was not supported by reliable evidence.
It similarly ruled out the claim that Suni attempted to sexually assault the victim in Goa in January 2017, stating that witness statements showed no such misconduct when he served as the driver of the vehicle used by the actress there.
The court also discussed various controversies that followed Dileep's arrest and the evidence relied upon by the prosecution, ultimately finding that the case had not been proved.
Pronouning its verdict on the sensational case on December 8, the court acquitted Dileep and three others.
Later, the court sentenced six accused, including the prime accused Suni, to 20 years' rigorous imprisonment.
The assault on the multilingual actress, after the accused allegedly forced their way into her car and held it under their control for two hours on February 17, 2017, had shocked Kerala.
Pulsar Suni sexually assaulted the actress and video recorded the act with the help of the other convicted persons in the moving car.
