Nation paid price for BJP’s compulsion to get 'chanda' at all costs: Congress
New Delhi (PTI): The Congress on Thursday alleged that the BJP's compulsion to get donations at all costs saw it go ahead with the electoral bonds scheme without heeding RBI's astute advice, as it claimed that over Rs 430 crore was donated to the ruling party by 33 companies that had negative or near zero profit.
Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh shared a media report on X which claimed that 33 loss-making firms donated electoral bonds worth Rs 582 crore with 75 per cent going to the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).
"There are four primary channels of corruption in the Electoral Bond Scam, and with each passing day, more examples emerge to confirm the shocking reality of the corruption which has engulfed this country through Narendra Modi's encouragement," Ramesh alleged.
"An update on the latest revelations on the 'Farzi Companies' who have been donating chanda to the BJP Chanda Do, Dhandha Lo; Theka Lo, Rishvat Do; Hafta Vasuli; Farzi Companies," he said in a post on X.
Ramesh claimed that Rs 434.2 crore was donated to the BJP by 33 companies that had negative or near zero profit after tax in aggregate over seven years (2016-17 to 2022-23).
"The aggregate net losses of these 33 companies were over Rs 1 lakh crore. 16 out of these 33 companies paid zero or negative direct taxes in aggregate," he said.
Most of these 33 companies are likely shell companies built for the purpose of money laundering, Ramesh said.
He also claimed that Rs 601 crore was donated to the BJP by six companies that had positive net profits in aggregate from 2016-17 to 2022-23, but whose electoral bond donations exceeded their aggregate net profit significantly.
These companies were likely acting as fronts for other companies, he alleged.
"When the Electoral Bonds Scheme was first floated by the Modi Sarkar, the RBI raised concerns regarding the high possibility of it being used for money laundering. The BJP's compulsion to get chanda at all costs saw it go ahead with this scheme without heeding this astute advice. The nation has paid the price!" Ramesh said.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Kerala HC grants bail to Boby Chemmanur; but says 'body shaming not acceptable'
Kochi, Jan 14: The Kerala High Court on Tuesday granted bail to prominent businessman Boby Chemmanur, who is in judicial custody after being arrested in a sexual harassment case filed against him by Malayalam actor Honey Rose.
Granting relief to Chemmanur, Justice P V Kunhikrishnan, however, said,"body shaming is not acceptable in our society".
"Comments about the body of a person as too fat, too skinny, too short, too tall, too dark, too black, etc. should be avoided. There is a sense that we are all 'too something' and we are all 'not enough'. This is life. Our bodies will change, our minds will change and our hearts will change. Everybody should be vigilant while making comments about others, whether they are men or women," the court said.
Noting that the businessman was accused of offences that entail a jail term of up to three years, the judge said the Supreme Court had observed that in offences where punishment was for seven years or less, an accused cannot be arrested by the police without sufficient reasons.
"In the light of the above principle, I think the petitioner can be released on bail after imposing stringent conditions... Moreover, it is a well-accepted principle that the bail is the rule and the jail is the exception," the judge said.
While granting him the relief, the court also noted that prima facie it was of the opinion that "there are ingredients to attract the offences alleged against the petitioner (Chemmanur).
Chemmanur has been charged under Section 75(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) for making "sexually coloured remarks" as a form of sexual harassment, as well as under Section 67 of the IT Act for publishing or transmitting obscene material in electronic form.
The High Court noted that he used words "with double meanings".
"Any Malayalee who reads the First Information Statement (FIS) can easily understand that the words used by the petitioner (Chemmanur) are with double meanings.
"Therefore, I am of the considered opinion that prima facie, the ingredients of the offences alleged are attracted. Even though the senior counsel (for Chemmanur) tried to argue before me that the ingredients of the offences are not attracted, I cannot agree with him on the same," Justice Kunhikrishnan said.
The court also said that "body shaming is not acceptable in our society".
"Comments about the body of a person as too fat, too skinny, too short, too tall, too dark, too black, etc. should be avoided. There is a sense that we are all 'too something' and we are all 'not enough'. This is life.
"Our bodies will change, our minds will change and our hearts will change. Everybody should be vigilant while making comments about others, whether they are men or women," the court said.
The High Court said that Chemmanur shall be released on bail on executing a bond of Rs 50,000 with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court.
It directed him to appear before the Investigating Officer (IO) for interrogation as and when required, cooperate with the probe and not to, directly or indirectly, influence or intimidate persons acquainted with the case to prevent them from disclosing facts to the court or any police officer.
It also directed Chemmanur not to commit an offence similar to the offence he is accused of and said that if any of the conditions were violated, his bail can be cancelled by the jurisdictional court.
The prosecution had opposed the bail plea, claiming that almost all of Chemmanur's social media posts carried sexually coloured remarks.
It had contended that granting him relief would send a wrong message to society.
The court, on the other hand, had said during the hearing that a message has already gone to the society as the businessman was in judicial custody since January 9.
He was arrested from Wayanad on January 8.
Chemmanur had approached the High Court after the Ernakulam Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II denied him bail on January 9 and sent him to judicial custody for 14 days.
In his bail plea, he has claimed that the allegations originated from a complaint lodged by the actor who, until recently, had publicly acknowledged and celebrated her two-decade-long acquaintance with him.
It has further mentioned that she had previously inaugurated three jewellery shops belonging to his business group as the chief guest in April 2019 at Perambra, in December 2022 at Attingal, and in August 2024 at Kannur.
The petition has stated that Honey Rose herself publicly disclosed the complaint by posting a letter addressed to Chemmanur on social media, announcing the filing of the complaint and making unwarranted remarks against him.
According to the actor's complaint, upon invitation, she inaugurated the Chemmanur International Jewellery showroom at Alakode, Kannur, on August 7, 2024, where thousands had gathered to witness the event.
During the inauguration ceremony, Chemmanur placed a necklace around the actress's neck and then made unwelcome sexual advances with bad intentions, twirling or rotating her, the complaint has stated.
However, Chemmanur has stated that he is completely innocent of all the accusations levelled against him and denied the allegations, calling them false, baseless, and incorrect.
