NHRC notice to Labour Min over woman CA's death allegedly due to 'excessive workload'
New Delhi, Sep 21: The NHRC on Saturday said it has sought a detailed response from the Union Ministry of Labour and Employment on reports that a woman chartered accountant died in Pune allegedly due to "excessive workload" at her office.
The National Human Rights Commission in a statement noted that it has constituted a 'Core Group on Business and Human Rights' to review legislations and regulations and firm up recommendations that will be sent to the central and state governments and their agencies to ensure the protection of human rights and healthy work environment in business and industry.
It also emphasised that businesses should "regularly update and revise their work and employment policies and regulations" to ensure alignment with global human rights standards.
The NHRC said it has taken "suo motu cognisance of media reports that a 26-year-old chartered accountant girl from Kerala died in Pune, Maharashtra on July 20, 2024, allegedly, due to excessive workload at the Ernst & Young that she joined four months back".
On Thursday, Union Labour and Employment Minister Mansukh Mandaviya had said that the death of Chartered Accountant Anna Sebastian Perayil was being investigated.
She had died of cardiac arrest in Pune this July.
Reportedly, the mother has written a letter to the employer claiming that "long hours of work had taken a heavy toll on her daughter's physical, emotional and mental health", a charge "denied" by the company, the NHRC statement said.
The Union Ministry of Labour and Employment is getting the matter investigated, the statement said.
The Commission has observed that the content of the media reports, if true, raises serious issues regarding challenges faced by young citizens at work, suffering from mental stress, anxiety, and lack of sleep, adversely affecting their physical and mental health while chasing impractical targets and timelines resulting in "grave violations of their human rights".
"It is the prime duty of every employer to provide a safe, secure and positive environment to its employees. They must ensure that everyone working with them is treated with dignity and fairness," the rights panel said.
The painful death of the young employee in the instant case has indicated that there is an "immediate need to take steps by all the stakeholders in this regard to stop such incidents in the country".
Accordingly, it has issued a notice to the Union Ministry of Labour and Employment, seeking a detailed report, it said.
The Commission would also like to know the outcome of the investigation, reportedly, being conducted in the instant matter relating to the death of the young employee, the NHRC said.
Apart from this, the Commission would also like to know the steps being taken and proposed to be taken to ensure such incidents do not recur. The response is expected within four weeks, it added.
According to the media report, carried on September 18, the mother of the deceased woman has claimed that her daughter's death is "reflective of the larger work culture, which glorifies hard work but at the cost of health".
She has reportedly stated that how can a company that speaks of values and human rights "fail even to show up for the funeral of one of its own employees," the statement said.
Meanwhile, Ernst & Young (EY) had on Wednesday issued a statement stating, "We are deeply saddened by Anna Sebastian's tragic and untimely passing in July 2024." Since the death, EY has been in touch with the family, helping them but it is only now that her family has chosen to write to the company, complaining about the "excessive workload", it had said.
The company said it will continue to improve and provide a healthy workplace in its offices throughout the country.
The Commission mentioned that it it had taken suo motu cognisance of media reports regarding alleged unfair practices at the workplace by two multinational companies in the states of Haryana and Tamil Nadu
Both matters are under consideration before the Commission. Apart from this, the Commission at various platforms has been insisting businesses integrate human rights protection, safety and security especially of women into their organisational culture to operate sustainably and extend these principles to formulate policies in such a manner that a healthy work environment is created for the welfare of the workers, it said.
Last year, the Commission organised a conference on 'harmonising human rights and climate issues in businesses' to sensitise various stakeholders, especially business and industry on human rights.
The Commission has also appointed a 'Special Monitor' to look into various practices and work environment leading to violations of human rights in business.
The NHRC has specifically constituted a 'Core Group on Business and Human Rights' to review the existing legislations and regulations relating to the business environment and human rights and suggest measures for improvement, it said.
Based on these inputs, the Commission intends to firm up its recommendations and send the same to the Central and state governments and their agencies to ensure the protection of human rights and a healthy work environment in business and industry, the statement said.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
K’taka HC judge whose controversial remarks triggered controversy expresses regret before open court
Bengaluru: Karnataka High Court judge, Justice V Srishananda, on Saturday expressed regret in open court after facing backlash over his controversial remarks in his recent court hearings, reported Bar and Bench.
Two purported video clips from Justice V Srishananda’s court hearing that show him making inappropriate comments went viral across social media platforms.
On Saturday, Justice Srishananda invited members of the Advocates Association, Bengaluru, and senior lawyers to his courtroom at 2:30 PM, where he read out a note expressing regret for inappropriate comments.
Quoting Advocates Association President Vivek Subba Reddy, Bar and Bench wrote, “He expressed regret for the comments and clarified that it was not his intention to offend any community or members of the Bar. He also requested the association to relay this message to all members of the Bar.”
Reddy further stated, “We also advised him to encourage young lawyers in the courtroom and refrain from making any irrelevant remarks during hearings.”
Another senior lawyer present during the session confirmed to the legal news portal that Justice Srishananda also addressed comments directed at a woman lawyer, who was seen in one of the videos being reprimanded by the judge. The judge Justice Srishananda clarified that his remarks were not intended to target her (woman lawyer) specifically, but rather pertained to the appellant she was representing. “He explained that his comment was meant to imply that the appellant seemed to know a lot about the other party,” said the lawyer.
In addition, Justice Srishananda assured those present that he would avoid making such comments in the future.
The controversy came to light on September 19, when a video clip from an August 28 Court hearing surfaced on social media, showing Justice Srishananda referring to a Muslim-majority sub-locality in Bengaluru’s Goripalya as "Pakistan." Hours later, another video from the same courtroom emerged, in which the judge was seen making a gender-insensitive remark.
Following outrage over the viral videos, a Supreme Court bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, along with Justices Sanjiv Khanna, BR Gavai, Surya Kant, and Hrishikesh Roy, on September 20 took a suo motu cognizance and sought a report from the Karnataka High Court Registrar General in connection with the viral video.
