New Delhi: More than 250 organisations and civil society activists across 22 states have raised their voices against the proposed "Dharm Sansad" scheduled for December 19 in Uttar Pradesh. In an open letter to the President, the groups have urged the Central government to intervene and prevent the event, citing its involvement with individuals accused of hate speech and incitement to violence.

The letter highlights the involvement of controversial figures such as Yati Narsinghanand, Rakesh Tomar, and Darshan Bharati, who are reportedly organising the event. These individuals, already charged with multiple hate crimes and violent acts, have not faced action despite violating bail conditions. The activists condemned the inaction of the Uttarakhand and Uttar Pradesh governments in holding these figures accountable.

The December 2021 "Dharm Sansad" in Haridwar, which included similar calls for violence, had already attracted widespread condemnation from national and international bodies, including retired military officials, judges, and opposition parties. The event tarnished India's global reputation, with concerns about the potential for violence and genocide.

The letter also references a prior appeal made in October by 101 retired senior government officials, urging the government to halt the event. However, no action was taken.

The activists have called on the President to direct the Central government to ensure the event does not take place, to instruct the state governments to cancel the bail of accused individuals, and to ensure compliance with Supreme Court orders on hate crimes. Additionally, they have demanded compensation for victims of violence related to hate speeches.

The organisations and individuals signing the letter include prominent groups such as AFDR, AICCTU, AISF, and APCR, along with over 190 activists.

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



Srinagar (PTI): Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah on Friday said there was no justification for the Tamil Nadu governor to stop TVK leader Vijay from forming the government, and he should be provided an opportunity to prove majority in the assembly.

Tamil Nadu Governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar on Thursday rejected TVK chief Vijay's claim to form the government, stating that his party lacks the requisite numbers.

The Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) has fallen short of meeting a simple majority to form the government in Tamil Nadu. Though the Congress with five MLAs has offered support to TVK, Vijay's party falls short of a simple majority of 118 in the 234-member Tamil Nadu Assembly.

Abdullah said there was no justification for President's rule in Tamil Nadu in view of numerous Supreme Court judgements emphasising on inviting the single largest party to form the government and then prove its majority on the floor of the house.

"If we see the Supreme Court judgement, then there should be no President's rule. There are so many cases in which the SC has clearly stated that after the elections, the single largest party should be invited (for government formation) and they should be allowed to prove their majority in the assembly," Abdullah told reporters here when asked about the political situation in Tamil Nadu.

"It happened when (former prime minister) (A B) Vajpayee formed the government for 13 days, the President of India did not wait for him to show his numbers. The President of India invited him, the government was there for 13 days, but when Vajpayee did not have the numbers, he resigned," he said.

So, if we take the SC judgement, the J-K CM added, then the Tamil Nadu Lok Bhavan "has no justification to stop this process".

"Vijay should be allowed to form the government, and then he should be provided an opportunity to prove his majority and if he proves, he will remain, but if not, then he will have to resign," Abdullah said.

To a question on whether there would be impact of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in Jammu and Kashmir, the CM said its impact remains to be seen in the rest of the country first as the assembly elections in the Union territory were not due till 2029.

"As of now it (SIR) has happened in Bengal only. Why are you worried about J-K? The elections are not to take place here till 2029. Let us first see its impact in the rest of the country. What we had to suffer (in J-K), we have. We suffered their delimitation, which was done to benefit the BJP and its friends. Let's see what happens in the future," he said.

On the reported remarks of Leader of Opposition in the J-K assembly, Sunil Sharma, that if the chief minister goes for cabinet expansion, then his party, the National Conference (NC), would suffer like the Shiv Sena in Maharashtra and someone like Eknath Shinde would emerge here as well, Abdullah said all his MLAs stand firmly with the party.

"This tells about the intentions of the BJP. 'Aaya Ram Gaya Ram' (turncoats). Eknath Shinde left because the BJP helped him to leave. It is obvious that the LoP is impatient to hold the chair of the chief minister of J-K. I will only tell him that there is no Eknath Shinde in the National Conference. NC's MLAs stand firmly with the party," he said.

Abdullah said the cabinet expansion is on hold because statehood has not been restored to J-K.

"Cabinet expansion is not on hold because of any fear and that is why I regularly say that the LoP proves through statements like this that till the BJP does not get power, they will not allow us to work smoothly and will not make J-K a state again," he said.

Hitting out at the LoP and the BJP, the J-K CM said the people of J-K, especially those who voted for the BJP in the last elections, should remember that the LoP and his party "indulge in the politics of blackmail and the people here are intimidated in the name of statehood".