Photo of woman’s body killed in Punjab shared on social media with false communal claim

details inside

PTI , Vartha Bharati | 01-02-2025 | 15:24:00 IST

Photo of woman’s body killed in Punjab shared on social media with false communal claim

Image Credit: PTI

New Delhi (PTI Fact Check): A photo recently circulated on social media, with users claiming it showed the body of a woman named Neelam, allegedly stuffed in a suitcase and dumped in a canal in Rajasthan by a Muslim man named Abid. It was also claimed that Abid and Neelam had married five months ago.

However, an investigation by the PTI Fact Check Desk found that the accused was actually Yuvraj Singh, a police officer. Singh, who was already married, was in a relationship with the victim. Reports suggest he killed the woman to get rid of her before his wife returned to India from abroad. Additionally, it was confirmed that the body was dumped in a canal in Punjab, not Rajasthan. The photo was shared on social media with false claims and a communal spin.

Claim

An Instagram user on January 24, shared a post claiming that a Muslim man named Abid killed his wife Neelam and disposed of her body in a suitcase at a canal in Rajasthan.

The caption of the post, originally in Hindi, read: “Abid packed Neelam in a suitcase and threw him into the canal, he was married 5 months ago. #Rajasthan”

Here is the link and archive link to the post, and below is a screenshot of the same.

(The image of the deceased has been blurred owing to the sensitivity of the matter).

Investigation

The Desk ran the viral image through Google Lens and found that it was shared by several other users with similar claims. Two such posts can be seen here and here, and their archive versions can be found here and here, respectively.

On further scanning the search results, the Desk came across a report by Dainik Bhaskar, published earlier this week. The feature image of the report matched with the picture of the deceased that is being shared on social media.

The headline of the report read: “Policeman murders girlfriend in Punjab: body thrown in canal; hails from Himachal, was taking air hostess coaching in Chandigarh”

Here is the link to the report.

A section of the report mentioned: “A 22-year-old girl from Himachal Pradesh, who was undergoing training to be an airhostess in Chandigarh, has been murdered. Her body was found in the Bhakra canal in Patiala. Her boyfriend is accused of her murder. He is a policeman by profession and is posted in Mohali.”

The Desk found another report by The Indian Express, published on January 24, whose headline read: “‘Cop’ allegedly kills woman friend by pushing her into canal, held”

Here is the link to the report and below is a screenshot of the same.

A section of the report read: “The accused, identified as Yuvraj Singh was produced in the district court, which remanded him in five-day police custody. The preliminary investigation indicated that the accused is married and was in a relationship with the victim. The accused wanted to get rid of the victim as his wife was returning to India from abroad.”

In the next part of investigation, the Desk accessed the FIR copy of the case, wherein the accused has been identified as Yuvraj Singh and the victim as 22-year-old Nisha Soni. Below is a screenshot of the translated FIR copy.

In the next part of investigation, we contacted Rupnagar Police for their comment on the viral claim. The fact-check report will be updated as and when a response is received.

Subsequently, the Desk concluded that there was no communal angle in the incident, since both the victim the accused were of the same religion.

CLAIM

A Muslim man named Abid killed his wife Neelam and disposed of her in a canal in Rajasthan.

FACT

Both the victim and accused in the case belong to the same religion. Also, they were in a relationship, but not married to each other.

CONCLUSION

Multiple social media users shared a photo claiming that it showed the body of a woman named Neelam, who was killed by her husband Abid. In its investigation, the Desk found that both the victim and accused in the case were Hindus. The photo was shared on social media with false claims and communal spin.

(This story was originally published by PTI, and republished by english.varthabharati.in as part of the Shakti Collective)

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.

Comments

comments powered by Disqus.

Trump says EU has until July 4 to approve last year's trade deal or it will face higher tariffs

08-05-2026 ¦ 08-05-2026 IST

Us president Donald Trump (PTI)

Washington (AP): President Donald Trump has said in a social media post that goods from the European Union would face higher tariff rates if the 27-member bloc fails to approve last year's trade framework by July 4.

The announcement on Thursday appeared to be a deadline extension after the president said last Friday that EU autos would face a higher 25 per cent tariff starting this week. Trump made the updated announcement after what he described as a "great call" with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.

Still, the US president was displeased that the European Parliament had yet to finalize the trade arrangement reached last year, which was further complicated in February by the US Supreme Court ruling that Trump lacked the legal authority to declare an economic emergency to impose the initial tariffs used to pressure the EU into talks.

"A promise was made that the EU would deliver their side of the Deal and, as per Agreement, cut their Tariffs to ZERO!" Trump posted. "I agreed to give her until our Country's 250th Birthday or, unfortunately, their Tariffs would immediately jump to much higher levels."

It was unclear from the post whether Trump was implying that the tariff rates would jump on all EU goods or the increase would only apply to autos.

His latest statement indicates he might be backing away from his earlier threat on EU autos by giving the European Parliament several more weeks to approve the agreement.

Under the original terms of the framework, the US would charge a 15 per cent tax on most goods imported from the EU.

But since the Supreme Court ruling, the administration has levied a 10 per cent tariff while investigating trade imbalances and national security issues, aiming to put in new tariffs to make up for lost revenues.