‘Police firing was pre-planned’: Thoothukudi residents were warned against rally
New Delhi, May 25: The tremor in his voice is evident as Godwin Jose begins to recount the horror of police firing in the protest rally against Sterlite on May 22. The 23-year-old from Sorispuram in Thoothukudi was among the tens of thousands of people who had gathered to take out the rally which ended with bloody violence leaving at 11 dead and several injured.
“The police opened fire when we tried to enter the Collectorate. So, we stepped away and sat somewhere outside. That was when there was a lathicharge too. Fearing lathicharge, we entered the Collectorate again, and there was shooting again,” Godwin says.
Godwin has no shred of doubt that the firing was pre-planned. “It looked as if the police were singling out those who were vocal, those who led the protests, and shot them above the abdomen,” he says.
“There was of course indiscriminate shooting, too, and many of us were hurt in the legs. But there were several rounds of fire, and we could see they were picking the targets at times. Thamizharasan, for example, was very active in the protest for quite some time. He has been shot dead. When you target the organisers and kill them, it is evident you want to kill the protest,” Godwin says.
Henry Tiphagne, executive director of People’s Watch, couldn’t agree more. “It was certainly planned and intended at quelling the protests,” he says.
On May 20, the district administration had called for a peace committee meeting in which over 20 organisations including traders’ associations and fishermen associations had participated. At this meeting, warnings were given against participating in the rally.
“We were advised against the protest rally in the meeting. The administration warned us against taking out a rally, since there were chances that it could turn violent. All of us agreed to hold a call-attention protest on a playground that was earmarked for us, and signed an agreement to that effect,” says S Raja of Tamil Nadu Vanigar Sangam (Traders Association). But the agreement did not go down well with many other protestors.
Henry says that people were also kept in the dark about the peace meeting and imposition of section 144. “Many villagers were in fact not informed of this agreement,” Henry says.
“Even when the collector issued Section 144 the previous day, it was not done the way it has to be. Normally when 144 is issued, there is a mike announcement made in the area. But in this case, there were no announcements. The people were still thinking the protest march was on,” Henry points out, “When the peace committee was a sham and there were no announcements, then how can the administration expect us to believe this was not planned?”
He adds that it is an abject failure on the part of central and state intelligence. “If the administration was really serious about finding a solution, they should have invited everyone who had a stake in the protest to the peace committee meeting. The Collector called only those he thought were protesters. The administration might have its own differences with an organisation like Makkal Adhikaram, but it is not fair that they were kept out of the peace committee meeting,” Henry explains.
Godwin says the administration’s advice to hold a call-attention protest was itself a strategy to dilute the protest. “We have been protesting for 100 days. We still couldn’t attract the attention of the administration or the government. How could the government have paid any attention on the 100th day alone?” he asks. Godwin also says the cops tracked down many protesters and had them arrested throughout the day.
This is not the first time that the TN police have attempted to put down a protest using force. In September 2012, a year after protests erupted against the Kudankulam nuclear power plant, the police opened fire against the protesters, killing one fisherman in the process. The week-long protests for jallikattu at Chennai’s Marina Beach in January 2017 culminated in violence, after a clash between the police and protesters.
“Every time the police decide to use force to put down a protest, they begin to say that protesters resorted to violence. From Kudankulam to Marina and Sterlite, the protests have always remained peaceful till the police reach the scene. So, who is to blame?” asks G Sundarrajan of Poovulagin Nanbargal.
Henry Tiphagne says the police had intended the protest to end the way the jallikattu protests did. “Their idea was to kill the protests. They have used brute force for that. The administration should realise a permanent solution will only be to shut Sterlite down,” he says.
courtesy : thenewsminute.com
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Waqf Bill: Oppn members meet LS Speaker to protest par panel chairman's 'unilateral' decisions
New Delhi, Nov 5: Opposition members in the parliamentary committee on the Waqf (Amendment) Bill met Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla on Tuesday to register their protest against alleged "unilateral" decisions being taken by panel chairman and BJP MP Jagdambika Pal.
They said the Speaker heard them patiently and assured them of a decision at the earliest.
"It was a very nice discussion. He was very kind to us. The Speaker has very patiently heard us and said he will look into the matter," TMC MP Kalyan Banerjee said.
Aam Aadmi Party MP Sanjay Singh and DMK MP A Raja spoke on similar lines.
"It was a fruitful meeting, the Speaker assured us of looking into our grievances," he said.
The MPs also submitted a memorandum to the Speaker detailing their concerns.
According to sources, the MPs submitted a letter to the Speaker, signed by Opposition MPs including Congress's Mohammad Jawed and Imran Masood, DMK's Raja, AIMIM's Asaduddin Owaisi, AAP's Sanjay Singh and TMC's Kalyan Banerjee.
Opposition MPs have accused Pal, the chairperson of the committee scrutinising the Bill, of taking "unilateral decisions" on fixing the dates of sittings -- which were at times for three consecutive days -- and whom to call as witnesses.
The MPs, in the memorandum, urged the Speaker to direct the Chairman of the JPC to have a formal consultation with members of the Committee before taking decisions on such issues, according to sources
They had also said they may be forced to "disassociate with JPC once for all as we have been stonewalled".
To a query on the issue on Tuesday, the MPs refused to divulge details. "We cannot reveal the details of the conversation," Singh said.
On whether they will continue to attend the meetings of the joint committee of the two Houses, Banerjee said, "Yes we will attend because the Speaker is looking into the matter".
The committee's proceedings have been stormy amid frequent protests from opposition members over a host of issues, while the BJP members have accused them of deliberately trying to scuttle its work.
