Patna: The simmering rift within RJD chief Lalu Prasad Yadav’s family has widened further, with elder son and Hasanpur MLA Tej Pratap Yadav launching a sharp attack on Congress leader Rahul Gandhi and his younger brother, Leader of the Opposition Tejashwi Yadav.
The controversy erupted after an alleged scuffle during the Voter Adhikar Yatra in Aurangabad involving the driver of Nabinagar MLA Vijay Kumar Singh alias Dablu Singh and his journalist brother. Sharing a video of the incident on X, Tej Pratap questioned Rahul and Tejashwi’s role in the campaign, saying, “I am not able to understand whether they have come out to save democracy or destroy it. The way Dablu Singh’s driver and his brother were beaten and abused by Jaichands is extremely wrong and shameful.”
Warning Tejashwi against “Jaichands” around him, he added, “Be careful, otherwise you will see very bad results in the elections. The results will decide how intelligent you are.”
This is not the first time Tej Pratap has alleged betrayal within his brother’s circle. Earlier, after a photo controversy involving him, he had accused Tejashwi’s associates of plotting against him, leading to his expulsion from the party and family for six years.
With fresh remarks, political observers say the sibling rivalry has resurfaced at a crucial time for the RJD ahead of the Assembly polls.
Meanwhile, Rahul Gandhi and Tejashwi Yadav continued their Yatra, holding public meetings in Gaya on Monday before moving to Nawada on Tuesday, where INDIA bloc leaders plan to highlight “vote chori” allegations against the BJP and the Election Commission.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
New Delhi (PTI): The Supreme Court on Monday ordered a forensic examination of an audio clip in which a senior Uttar Pradesh police officer purportedly is heard using a communal slur against Muslims.
A bench comprising Justices Ahsanuddin Amanullah and K Vinod Chandran also quashed the criminal proceedings against a senior Muslim citizen who had circulated the clip seeking confirmation of its authenticity.
The voice clip, which will now be examined by a forensic laboratory, is allegedly of Sanjeev Tyagi, who is now serving as the Deputy Inspector General of Police in the state.
The bench said the prosecution of petitioner Islamuddin Ansari was "totally an abuse of police authority and the judicial process", noting that the Uttar Pradesh government itself had sought withdrawal of the case after it issued notice.
ALSO READ: Delhi HC asks Centre to hear affected persons before demolishing structures in Ajmer dargah
"We find it to be totally an abuse of their authority and also the process of the court by the police in initiating the proceeding... we are more concerned with the background in which such a situation arose.
"The petitioner having asked the superintendent of police and rightly so, before making a formal complaint, as to whether the voice purported to be his, disclosing that he had used some very objectionable language was, never replied to," the bench said.
The controversy began when Ansari confronted Tyagi, then Superintendent of Police, over the alleged circulation of an audio clip in which the officer was heard making derogatory remarks against Muslims.
Before filing any complaint, Ansari had forwarded the clip to Tyagi asking whether the voice was his.
The officer never replied, and Ansari was instead booked for circulating hate speech.
His challenges before the trial court and the High Court failed, prompting him to approach the Supreme Court.
After the state informed the court it was withdrawing the complaint, the bench observed that the case against Ansari was "nothing but a counterblast" for questioning a senior police officer.
Finding the conduct of the local police "wholly unacceptable", the court set aside the FIR, chargesheet and all proceedings.
It also ordered an inquiry into the authenticity of the audio clip, directing that Tyagi's voice sample be collected and tested at the Telangana State Forensic Science Laboratory (TSFSL), Hyderabad, under the direct supervision of its director.
The bench said the director would be "personally responsible" for ensuring the test is conducted by competent officers "uninfluenced by any person, authority or extraneous consideration".
Tyagi, now DIG of Basti range, has been directed to appear before the Hyderabad laboratory within three weeks to provide his voice sample.
The petitioner will furnish the original audio clip or link for comparison.
The TSFSL director has been added as a respondent and must submit the forensic report in a sealed cover by January 31, 2026. The matter will be heard next on January 12, 2026.
Issuing a firm caution, the court warned authorities against any form of retaliation or pressure on Ansari during the inquiry, permitting him to approach it directly in case of harassment.
