New Delhi, Sep 5 : The Maharashtra Police on Wednesday told the Supreme Court that five rights activists, who have been kept under house arrest, belong to banned terrorist outfit Communist Party of India (Maoist) and are engaged in planning and execution of large-scale violence, having the potential of destabilizing the society.

The police has sought to dispel the perception that five rights activists were arrested for expressing any dissenting views or holding differing political and ideological positions.

Seeking the vacation of the August 29 order by which five activists were put under house arrest and seeking their custodial interrogation, the state police urged the court to permit it to take them in its (police) custody and interrogate them in accordance with the law.

Police have contended that the house arrest merely restricts the physical movement of the accused but he can always ensure not only destruction of evidence elsewhere, but can alert other potential accused while sitting in his home.

Referring to the "incriminating" material it had collected in the course of its investigation, the police in its affidavit filed on Wednesday said that five accused were also "clearly found to be a part of the criminal conspiracy and their role was not merely peripheral but they were found to be playing a very vital role in the criminal offences committed and/or planned by others".

Asserting that the material it has found from the "computers/laptops/pen drives/memory cards" belonging to the five accused was "shocking" as it clearly implicated them not only as active members of CPI (Maoist) but pointed to a "sinister design" of having committed and in the process of committing criminal offences having the "potential of destabilizing the society".

"The contents also clearly reflect the preparation, planning and coordination not only amongst the aforesaid persons but with others (subsequently arrested) to carry out violence, planned ambush/rebellion against the "enemy" (which is our country and its security forces)", the state police said in its affidavit.

The police have said this in response to the notice issued by the top court after it had on August 29 ordered that they be kept under house arrest.

Alleging that serious criminal offences are made out and incriminating material has emerged against them in the course of the investigation since January 8, 2018, when the FIR was registered, the police said that the petition by historian Romila Thapar and others under Article 32 was not maintainable.

The police contended that it was only the accused persons who could initiate proceedings before the competent courts including the constitutional courts.

Addressing the concern of Justice D.Y. Chandrachud that the "dissent is a safety valve of democracy, if it is not allowed the pressure cooker will burst", the police in its affidavit said that five people were not arrested "based upon any dissenting views expressed by them or difference in their political or other ideologies".

Asserting that the state government is committed to the protection of fundamental rights of every citizen, the affidavit says, "A mere dissenting view, difference in ideology or vehement objections to the political thinking cannot be prohibited and should always be welcomed in any democratic country."

It said that if a citizen vociferously and vehemently expresses his dissent with the programmes, policies and working of the government, that "cannot be and should not be a ground to curtail personal liberty of such a person".

Describing dissent as a safety valve, the Supreme Court had on August 29 ordered that the five human rights activists arrested by the Pune Police should be kept under house arrest until the next date of hearing on September 6.

Justice Chandrachud noted that the arrests had taken place nine months after the activists were linked to the violence at Bhima-Koregaon in Maharashtra.

Those arrested on Tuesday included Varavara Rao in Hyderabad, Gautam Navlakha in Delhi, Sudha Bharadwaj in Haryana and Arun Ferreira and Vernon Gonzalves in Maharashtra.




Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



Guwahati(PTI): Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma on Friday said he felt "ashamed" that an MP from his state had asserted in Parliament during the Waqf Bill debate that Muslims were not allowed to offer Eid prayers on streets, and issued an apology.

''The people of Assam also do not want to offer 'namaz' on streets when there are beautiful and good mosques in the state'', the CM said at a press conference after a cabinet meeting.

Sarma was apparently referring to Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi, though he did not name him directly.

Gogoi, during the debate, had criticised the government for allegedly preventing Muslims from offering Eid prayers on streets, questioning the BJP’s commitment to minority rights

''People from across the country are calling me about it. We are ashamed and I as the CM apologise to people across the country'', Sarma said.

There has been no demand from Muslims that they want to offer prayers on roads, he added.

He further alleged that the MP’s remarks created the impression that only one community contributed to India’s freedom struggle.

''This MP went to the extreme of highlighting only one community’s role. There was no mention of Mahatma Gandhi, Gopinath Bordoloi, Subhas Chandra Bose, or other key figures," Sarma said.

Replying to a question on the BJP's prospects in the forthcoming panchayat polls scheduled to be held in two phases on May 2 and 7, Sarma said, ''It will be good in all the elections- panchayat, Rabha Hasong Council, Bodoland Territorial Council and assembly polls as the people of Assam have immense faith and confidence in Prime Minister Narendra Modi."

"It is only the extreme statements made by a particular MP from Assam in Parliament which has made us sad and we are feeling ashamed about it'', he added.

People of Assam will ''teach a lesson to such people when the time comes'', the CM said.