Mumbai: The leaked health insurance claim document of actor Saif Ali Khan has stirred widespread debate on social media, highlighting the stark disparities in how insurance companies handle claims for celebrities compared to ordinary citizens. The document, leaked on the microblogging platform X, revealed that Khan filed a claim of ₹35.95 lakh with Niva Bupa Health Insurance for his treatment costs. However, the insurer approved ₹25 lakh, while the final hospital bill amounted to ₹26 lakh.

The incident has drawn attention to the challenges faced by middle-class policyholders. Dr Prashant Mishra, a cardiac surgeon at Tunga Hospital, criticised insurance companies for their leniency towards luxury hospitals and celebrities, stating, "For smaller hospitals, insurers rarely sanction amounts exceeding ₹5 lakh." He also expressed concerns over the rising premiums caused by such practices.

Real-life cases from citizens further highlighted the inconsistencies. Mahesh Seth, whose wife underwent hip and knee surgeries, had to pay ₹4 lakh upfront as the hospital was not in the insurer's network. He was later reimbursed ₹3.88 lakh, with certain expenses deemed non-reimbursable. Similarly, Kiran Karkera, 28, recounted the tedious process of navigating claims after his spine surgery, despite having a top-up policy.

A Goregaon resident shared her ordeal after her endoscopy claim for ₹15,000 was rejected on technical grounds, as it was classified as an OPD procedure. Insurance consultant Mahavir Chopra pointed out the limitations of cashless insurance policies during emergencies, citing instances where immediate payments were required, leaving policyholders to bear the financial burden temporarily.

Responding to the controversy, a spokesperson for Niva Bupa Health Insurance clarified that treatment costs vary depending on factors like hospital location, severity of the condition, and room type. Claims are processed per policy terms, with customers required to follow specific procedures for cashless or reimbursement claims.

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



New Delhi (PTI): Parliament early Friday passed the contentious Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, after it was approved by the Rajya Sabha.

The Lok Sabha had on Thursday approved the Bill after over a 12-hour debate.

In Rajya Sabha, the Bill got 128 votes in its favour and 95 against after all the amendments moved by the opposition were rejected.

In the lower house, the bill was supported by 288 MPs while 232 voted against it.

Participating in a debate in the Rajya Sabha, Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said the Bill was brought with a number of amendments based on suggestions given by various stakeholders.

"The Waqf Board is a statutory body. All government bodies should be secular," the minister said, explaining the inclusion of non-Muslims on the board.

He, however, said the number of non-Muslims has been restricted to only four out of 22.

Rijiju also alleged that the Congress and other opposition parties, and not the BJP, were trying to scare Muslims with the Waqf Bill.

"You (opposition) are pushing Muslims out of the mainstream," he added.

He said for 60 years, the Congress and others ruled the country, but did not do much for Muslims and the community continues to live in poverty.

"Muslims are poor, who is responsible? You (Congress) are. Modi is now leading the government to uplift them," the minister said.

According to the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, Waqf tribunals will be strengthened, a structured selection process will be maintained, and a tenure will be fixed to ensure efficient dispute resolution.

As per the Bill, while Waqf institutions' mandatory contribution to Waqf boards is reduced from 7 per cent to 5 per cent, Waqf institutions earning over Rs 1 lakh will undergo audits by state-sponsored auditors.

A centralised portal will automate Waqf property management, improving efficiency and transparency.

The Bill proposes that practising Muslims (for at least five years) can dedicate their property to the Waqf, restoring pre-2013 rules.

It stipulates that women must receive their inheritance before the Waqf declaration, with special provisions for widows, divorced women and orphans.

The Bill proposes that an officer above the rank of collector investigate government properties claimed as Waqf.

It also proposes that non-Muslim members be included in the central and state Waqf boards for inclusivity.