SC bench to hear if litigant should first approach sessions court for anticipatory bail
New Delhi (PTI): The Supreme Court on Wednesday referred to a three-judge bench the issue whether it is the "choice of the party" to move high courts for anticipatory bail or was it mandatory for litigants to first approach a sessions court.
A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta said the matter be posted for hearing as and when the three-judge bench is constituted.
"This matter requires to be heard by a three-judge bench," the bench said.
The apex court had earlier appointed senior advocate Siddharth Luthra as an amicus curiae for assistance in the matter.
The top court on September 8 had taken note of the Kerala High Court's "regular practice" of entertaining anticipatory bail applications directly without the litigant moving the sessions court.
"One issue which in bothering us is, in the Kerala High Court there seems to be a regular practice that the high court entertains the anticipatory bail applications directly without the litigant approaching the sessions court. Why is that so?" the bench had asked.
It had said there was a hierarchy provided in the erstwhile Code of Criminal Procedure and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.
Section 482 of the BNSS deals with direction for grant of bail to person apprehending arrest.
"It doesn't happen in any other state. Only in the Kerala High Court, we have noticed that regularly applications (for anticipatory bail) are being directly entertained," the bench had observed.
The top court's observation came while hearing a plea by two men challenging a Kerala High Court order rejecting their plea for anticipatory bail.
The bench noted in the case, the petitioners directly moved the high court for the relief without first going to the sessions court.
The high court was observed to have entertained such applications directly without the applicant approaching the sessions court that might result in proper facts not being placed on record which otherwise would have come before the sessions court.
"We are inclined to consider this aspect and decide the issue as to whether the option to approach the high court would be at the choice of the party or it should be mandatory that the accused should first approach the sessions court," the bench added.
It had issued notice on this aspect to the Kerala High Court, through its registrar general.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Minor girl kidnapped and raped; main accused and two cafe owners held
Latur (PTI): A minor girl was allegedly kidnapped and raped by an 18-year-old man in Latur, leading to the arrest of the main accused and owners of two cafes where the crime occurred on December 4, police said on Saturday.
Police traced the girl within hours of registering the complaint. The accused, identified as Rihan Gulab Shaikh, was arrested based on the girl's complaint. Two others are owners of two cafes where the crime occurred, police said.
Police registered a case under various sections of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS), POCSO Act, and the Prevention of Atrocities Act, an official said.
