Shiv Sena (UBT) mouthpiece Saamana slams Supreme Court for ‘true Indian’ remark against Rahul Gandhi
Editorial defends Rahul Gandhi, questions judicial overreach on China remarks
Mumbai: In a strongly worded editorial published on Wednesday in its mouthpiece Saamana, the Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena (UBT) came out in open support of Congress leader and Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi, while sharply criticising the Supreme Court for its recent observation questioning Gandhi’s patriotism. The party termed the remarks as "wrong in every manner" and accused the judiciary of overstepping its mandate.
The controversy stems from oral observations made by a division bench of the Supreme Court, comprising Justice Dipankar Dutta and Justice A.G. Masih, during the hearing of a petition against Rahul Gandhi. The bench had questioned Gandhi’s statements during the Bharat Jodo Yatra about Chinese occupation of Indian territory, asking, “How did you know that China swallowed 2,000 square kilometres of India? Were you present there?” Justice Dutta reportedly added, “No true Indian would say such things, and if you are a true Indian, do not make such statements.”
Reacting to this, the Saamana editorial said, “What has the Supreme Court achieved by making such an observation? Was Rahul Gandhi’s patriotism the issue before the court?” It added that the judiciary has no business defining who is or isn’t a ‘true Indian’ and should refrain from giving unsolicited moral verdicts.
The Thackeray faction further asserted that since 2014, the definition of nationalism has been distorted by the BJP-led government, where praise for the regime is equated with patriotism, and dissent is branded as anti-national. “The ruling government has taken it upon itself to distribute certificates of patriotism and label those who question it as anti-nationals,” it said.
The editorial pointed out that Rahul Gandhi, as the Leader of Opposition, has every right to raise issues of national security, including Chinese intrusion, and questioned why similar statements made by BJP leaders such as Dr. Subramanian Swamy and Arunachal Pradesh MP Tapir Gao were not treated with equal scrutiny.
“Dr Swamy has publicly alleged that China grabbed 4,067 square kilometres of land in Ladakh. He even filed RTI queries and moved court, yet his patriotism was never questioned,” the editorial noted. It also cited Tapir Gao’s 2019 statement in Parliament about Chinese incursions in Arunachal Pradesh, wondering why Gandhi's remarks are seen as problematic while others escape criticism.
Addressing the Supreme Court’s suggestion that Gandhi should speak in Parliament rather than on social media, the editorial said, “Rahul Gandhi has repeatedly stated that he is not allowed to speak in Parliament. Opposition attempts to discuss the issue have been blocked under the pretext of national security.”
In a rhetorical flourish, the editorial concluded: “If the Supreme Court believes that questioning the government makes someone unpatriotic, will it now constitute a fact-finding committee to determine who is a true Indian?”
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Niqab incident: Nitish Kumar perhaps revealing his true colours, says J-K CM
Srinagar (PTI): Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah on Wednesday criticised his Bihar counterpart over the niqab incident and said that Nitish Kumar might be slowly revealing his true nature.
"Nitish Kumar, who was once considered a secular leader, may be slowly showing his true colours," Abdullah told reporters here on the sidelines of a function.
Abdullah said Kumar removing the face veil of a Muslim woman doctor was wrong and cannot be justified by any means.
"We have seen this kind of incident here several years ago. Have you forgotten how Mehbooba Mufti removed the burqa of a legitimate voter inside a polling station? That act was wrong, and this act (of Kumar) is also wrong.
"If the (Bihar) chief minister did not want to hand over the order to her (Muslim woman), they could have kept her aside. However, to humiliate her like this is totally wrong," the Jammu and Kashmir chief minister said.
Kumar stirred a huge controversy after he removed the face veil of a Muslim woman at a function earlier this week.
