Tahawwur Rana lands in Delhi after extradition from US
New Delhi: A special flight carrying Tahawwur Hussain Rana, a key accused in the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks, landed at Delhi's Palam airport on Thursday following his extradition from the United States.
Security has been significantly heightened outside the Patiala House Court, where Rana is expected to be produced later today. Personnel from paramilitary forces and the Delhi Police have been deployed to ensure law and order.
Rana, a 64-year-old Pakistani-origin Canadian national and close associate of convicted terrorist David Coleman Headley, was lodged in the Metropolitan Detention Centre in Los Angeles prior to extradition. His final appeal to avoid extradition was rejected by the US Supreme Court, clearing the path for his return to India.
Sources suggest Rana will be lodged in a high-security ward of Delhi's Tihar Jail. Preparations have already been made to accommodate him under tight security.
In preparation for his trial, a Delhi court has received the complete trial records of the 26/11 attacks from a Mumbai court. The records were sought by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) to support the prosecution.
The Union Ministry of Home Affairs has appointed senior advocate Narender Mann as the special public prosecutor to handle the case under the NIA’s jurisdiction.
Former Union Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde welcomed the extradition, calling it a positive step for India’s fight against terrorism.
Rana’s extradition is being viewed as a diplomatic and investigative breakthrough, with Indian authorities hoping to further expose the role of Pakistani state actors in the deadly 2008 attacks that claimed 166 lives in Mumbai.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Bhojshala case: Disputed structure built from remains of pre-existing temples, claims ASI
Indore (PTI): The ASI has told the Madhya Pradesh High Court that a massive structure dating back to the Paramara kings' rule existed at the disputed Bhojshala temple-Kamal Maula mosque complex, and the current structure was built from the remains of temples.
The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) made the claim on Tuesday based on its 98-day scientific survey and over 2,000-page report.
The Hindu community considers Bhojshala a temple dedicated to Vagdevi (Goddess Saraswati), while the Muslim side claims the monument as the Kamal Maula Mosque. The disputed complex is protected by the ASI.
During the hearing before Justices Vijay Kumar Shukla and Alok Awasthi of the HC's Indore bench, Additional Solicitor General Sunil Kumar Jain, representing the ASI, presented a detailed account of the scientific survey conducted two years ago at the complex.
Referring to the ASI's survey report, he said, "Retrieved architectural remains, sculptural fragments, large slabs of inscriptions with literary texts, Nagakarnika inscriptions on pillars, etc, suggest that a large structure associated with literary and educational activities existed at the site. Based on scientific investigations and archaeological remains recovered during the investigations, this pre-existing structure can be dated to the Paramara period."
It can be said that the existing structure was made from the parts of earlier temples, based on scientific investigations, survey and archaeological excavations conducted, study and analysis of retrieved finds, study of architectural remains, sculptures, and inscriptions, art and sculptures, Jain said quoting the report.
Summarising the report, he also drew the court's attention to the fact that the archaeological study identifies that many architectural components, such as pillars and beams, were originally part of temple structures before being repurposed for a mosque.
"The evidence of this transition includes Sanskrit and Prakrit inscriptions that were damaged or hidden, alongside sculptures of deities and animals that were often mutilated or defaced," Jain contended.
The report also states that "all Sanskrit and Prakrit inscriptions are older than the Arabic and Persian inscriptions, indicating that users or engravers of the Sanskrit and Prakrit inscriptions occupied the place earlier".
In light of the Muslim side's earlier objections, the bench wanted to know why there were some discrepancies in the ASI's responses regarding the status of the disputed complex in the cases filed over the years.
The Additional Solicitor General argued that earlier studies of the complex involved only officials, while the current survey involved scientists and the use of advanced technologies such as Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR).
The hearing in the Bhojshala case will continue on Wednesday.
The high court has been regularly hearing four petitions and one writ appeal regarding the religious nature of the Bhojshala temple-Kamal Maula mosque complex since April 6.
