Jaipur (PTI) Slamming the ED action against his son Vaibhav and Rajasthan Congress chief Govind Singh Dotasra, Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot Thursday accused the BJP of unleashing "terror" in the country.
Gehlot also said the Enforcement Directorate (ED) swung into action after he announced two poll promises on Wednesday for women of the state.
He said that five more promises are also going to be declared on Friday and dared the ED to find five more Congress leaders to take action.
The chief minister also likened the ED action to locust attack and said the ED raids would destroy "BJP's crops".
Gehlot claimed that ED raids happen wherever elections are held. Be it Chhattisgarh, Karnataka or Himachal Pradesh, ED raids happened just before elections, the chief minister said.
"Raids happened but the Congress won the elections. The situation is worrisome. They have unleashed terror in the country," Gehlot said at a press conference here.
Asserting that the Congress "will not be scared no matter how hard they try", he alleged the BJP was targeting him through ED raids as they could not topple his government.
"We will win the elections," the chief minister asserted.
The ED on Thursday raided the premises of state Congress president Dotasra and Omprakash Hudla, the party's candidate from Mahua assembly seat, as part of a money laundering probe into the alleged exam paper leak case in the poll-bound state.
The agency has also summoned Vaibhav Gehlot for questioning in a case related to alleged contravention of the foreign exchange law.
After the raids, Congress workers sat on a dharna in Sikar and Jaipur and raised slogans against Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
Citing data, Gehlot said that 112 searches by the ED happened during 10 years of UPA rule and charge sheets were filed in 104 cases. But after 2014, as many as 3,010 raids happened and charge sheets were filed in 881 cases, he said.
He said, "The locusts come here from Pakistan and eat the crops. ED will destroy their (BJP's) crops. ED will worsen the condition of BJP... word will spread in every village that (they) are using ED like locusts," he said.
Referring to the 2020 political crisis, Gehlot said that Prime Minister Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah could not topple the Congress government in Rajasthan, hence the state and he (Gehlot) are their target.
"They are targeting me because, be it Prime Minister Modi or Amit Shah, they could not topple the government in Rajasthan. That pain is so terrible for them. Rajasthan is deliberately their biggest target because their attempts failed here," he said.
Gehlot said that the situation in the country is worrying and "terror" is being created through investigative agencies.
"They know that the Congress is going to give seven 'guarantees' (poll promises). Two guarantees were given yesterday in the presence of Priyanka Gandhi. Five more are yet to be announced. Those guarantees will be announced tomorrow," he said.
In a public rally of AICC general secretary Priyanka Gandhi in Jhunjhunu on Wednesday, CM Gehlot promised two "guarantees" if the Congress is re-elected in the state -- cooking gas cylinders for Rs 500 to 1.05 crore families and an annual honorarium of Rs 10,000 to the woman head of a family in instalments.
Gehlot said that the state investigating agency sent letters to the ED six times in the Sanjeevani Credit Cooperative Society "scam" case but the federal agency was not taking any action.
The CM has been targeting Union minister and Jodhpur MP Gajendra Singh Shekhawat, while accusing him of being involved in the "scam".
The Congress' state in-charge Sukhjinder Singh Randhawa, and state ministers Mahesh Joshi and Pratap Singh Khachariyawas were among those present at the press conference.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
New Delhi (PTI): Merely breaking up may not amount to instigation for a case of abetment of suicide under the criminal law, the Delhi High Court has said.
Justice Manoj Jain made the observation while dealing with a bail plea by a man accused of abetting the suicide of his former partner, who hanged herself five days after his marriage to another woman.
Granting bail to the accused, the court observed that the instigation should be of such a nature that leaves the deceased with no option but to commit suicide.
It said only a trial would establish whether the deceased's "extreme step" was on account of provocation, instigation, "merely on account of her being hyper-sensitive girl" or for some other reason.
ALSO READ: ASHA workers threaten indefinite strike from Feb 27 over rationalisation order, pending demands
In the present case, the court noted, there was no dying declaration, and the parties were in a relationship for around eight years, during which there was no complaint from the deceased.
The court observed there was a considerable time gap between the date when the parties stopped talking and the date of the suicide.
"Apparently, it seems to be a case of a broken relationship and quite possibly, the deceased, having come to know that the applicant has got married to someone else, has chosen to finish herself," the court said in the order passed on February 24.
"Though broken relationship and heartbreaks have become common these days, mere breaking-up of relationship may not per se constitute instigation so as to make it to be a case of abetment under Section 108 BNS (abetment of suicide)," the court order read.
According to the father of the deceased, his daughter had been trapped by the accused, who pressured her to convert to his religion for marriage, and it was under such pressure that his daughter committed suicide by hanging herself with a chunni in October 2025.
The accused was arrested in November 2025.
The court observed that, according to the woman's friends, she was upset, and they never claimed anything on conversion. The accused had stopped talking to her from February 2025 onwards, it said.
According to the order, the man was let out on bail on a personal bond and surety bond of Rs 25,000 each.
The accused submitted that the parties were in a cordial relationship for around eight years, but the woman's parents were against the relationship since they belonged to different religions.
He alleged that it was her parents who forced her to sever the relationship.
