Thirteen senior advocates urge CJI to direct CBI probe against Justice Shekhar Yadav
New Delhi: Thirteen senior advocates of the Supreme Court have written to Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna, urging him to take suo motu cognizance of a speech delivered by Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav of the Allahabad High Court. The letter demands the CBI lodge an FIR against Justice Yadav, citing his remarks as hate speech that violates constitutional values and judicial impartiality.
The advocates highlighted Justice Yadav’s speech at an event organised by the Vishva Hindu Parishad's legal cell on December 8, 2024, within the Allahabad High Court library premises. They alleged that his comments, including divisive rhetoric and derogatory remarks towards Muslims, contradict the oath of office taken by a judge.
The letter noted Justice Yadav’s statements referring to “hamari Gita” (our Gita) and “aapki Koran” (your Koran), alongside other remarks that allegedly painted one religious community in a negative light. He reportedly criticised Muslim practices such as polygamy and triple talaq, characterising the community as lacking generosity and tolerance.
The advocates emphasised that the speech promoted majoritarian views, undermined the constitutional principles of secularism, and posed a threat to India’s unity and integrity. Justice Yadav also invoked divisive imagery, referencing the Ram Mandir issue and unfounded fears of India becoming “Bangladesh” or “Taliban.”
The letter further pointed out that Justice Yadav’s appointment to the Allahabad High Court was opposed by former CJI Dr D.Y. Chandrachud, citing inadequate work experience and his association with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and a BJP leader.
Referring to the Supreme Court’s ruling in K. Veeraswami v. Union of India (1991), the advocates argued that a criminal case against a sitting judge requires consultation with the CJI. They called for immediate action, stating Justice Yadav’s remarks violated Articles 14, 21, 25, and 26 of the Constitution.
The letter also highlighted the Supreme Court’s Amish Devgan v. Union of India (2021) judgment, describing Justice Yadav’s speech as hate speech promoting enmity between religious groups. It urged the judiciary to uphold its impartiality and ensure accountability for actions undermining public confidence in the justice system.
Justice Yadav reportedly stands by his comments, as per media reports. The advocates concluded by requesting the CJI to ensure that appropriate legal and constitutional measures are taken against the judge.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Vijay secures majority support, set to stake claim to form Tamil Nadu govt
Chennai: After four days of political uncertainty and intense negotiations in Tamil Nadu, actor-politician Vijay is learnt to have secured the numbers required to form the government, sources said.
Supporters gathered outside Vijay’s residence in Chennai on Friday evening, raising slogans in support of Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam soon after reports emerged that the party had managed to secure majority support.
Sources said Vijay is expected to meet Tamil Nadu Governor R. V. Arlekar on Friday evening to stake claim to form the government. The meeting is likely to take place around 6 pm.
In its electoral debut in the Tamil Nadu Assembly elections, TVK won 108 out of the 234 seats, dealing a major blow to the 62-year political dominance of Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam and All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam.
However, Governor Arlekar had reportedly made it clear that the party would not be invited to form the government without proving a clear majority. Even after two rounds of discussions on Wednesday and Thursday, the Governor is learnt to have maintained his stand that letters of support from at least 118 MLAs must be submitted in the 234-member Assembly.
Apart from Vijay, TVK had the backing of 107 MLAs. Vijay had contested from Tiruchy (East) and Perambur constituencies and won both seats, meaning he would have to resign from one seat before taking oath. This increased the need for additional support.
Amid the political developments, five MLAs from the Congress party, which reportedly moved away from the DMK-led alliance, extended support to Vijay. Vijay also held discussions with leaders of Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi, Communist Party of India (Marxist) and Communist Party of India.
The VCK, CPI(M) and CPI had so far been allies of the DMK. At the same time, political discussions intensified in the state over speculation that the DMK could even explore a post-poll understanding with its long-time rival AIADMK to prevent an alternative government from taking shape.
Reports had been circulating since Friday afternoon that the VCK and Left parties were likely to support Vijay. Sources later said that the VCK, CPI(M) and CPI agreed to extend the support of two MLAs each, helping TVK cross the required majority mark.
All eyes are now on the Governor’s next move and the official announcement regarding the formation of the new government in Tamil Nadu.
